• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 172 Production Progress

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

barrykas

Established Member
Joined
19 Sep 2006
Messages
1,579
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know if the units have a new style cab, or is it more or less the same as the 170's?

Cabs (at least on the Chiltern and LO variants) are based on Chiltern's 168/2's (specifically 218 and 219).

Cheers,

Barry
 

Turbostar

Member
Joined
15 Aug 2006
Messages
1,039
Location
Plymouth, Devon
Not exactly, I'm on about the non-gangwayed versions, just curious whether they had completely new cab interiors, i.e. the console, controls, etc., or whether they were more or less the same as the 170/171 units?
 

the sniper

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2007
Messages
3,498
Not exactly, I'm on about the non-gangwayed versions, just curious whether they had completely new cab interiors, i.e. the console, controls, etc., or whether they were more or less the same as the 170/171 units?

Barry provided your answer here ;):

Cabs (at least on the Chiltern and LO variants) are based on Chiltern's 168/2's (specifically 218 and 219).
 

Turbostar

Member
Joined
15 Aug 2006
Messages
1,039
Location
Plymouth, Devon
I was replying to Bastaan actually.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Cabs (at least on the Chiltern and LO variants) are based on Chiltern's 168/2's (specifically 218 and 219).

Cheers,

Barry

Cheers Barry. I take it if they'll be the same, the only thing will be the lack of controls on the LM version of tripcock safety system that is below the speedo, that obviously the Chiltern & LO versions will need?
 

anthony263

Established Member
Joined
19 Aug 2008
Messages
6,890
Location
South Wales
I was replying to Bastaan actually.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---


Cheers Barry. I take it if they'll be the same, the only thing will be the lack of controls on the LM version of tripcock safety system that is below the speedo, that obviously the Chiltern & LO versions will need?

I doubt the London Overground class 172's will be fitted with tripcock since they dont really operate over any London Underground routes
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,236
I doubt the London Overground class 172's will be fitted with tripcock since they dont really operate over any London Underground routes

Haven't earlier posts also pointed out that the Chiltern 172s won't have tripcocks, because there is nowhere on the lightweight bogies to mount them...
 

RPM

Established Member
Joined
24 Sep 2009
Messages
1,531
Location
Buckinghamshire
Cheers Barry. I take it if they'll be the same, the only thing will be the lack of controls on the LM version of tripcock safety system that is below the speedo, that obviously the Chiltern & LO versions will need?

The controls beneath the speedo on a 165 and 168 are for the ATP not the tripcock. The tripcock is a passive sytem and doesn't really have a lot in the way of controls except an isolation switch. Resetting of the tripcock is carried out by depressing the uncoupler button.

The Chiltern 172s will not have tripcocks due to issues with mounting the tripcock beam on the lightweight bogies. This means they will not be allowed to operated over the Met unless they are boxed in between 2 165s.
 

Turbostar

Member
Joined
15 Aug 2006
Messages
1,039
Location
Plymouth, Devon
Sorry, I misunderstood. So, correct me if I'm wrong, the 172 cab is more or less the same as the 168/2, minus the ATP buttons & display on the speedo?
 

thewolf

Member
Joined
1 Apr 2006
Messages
141
Is this unit working during this week?

Any timings for it?

I'm down in London tomorrow and probably have a fair bit of time to kill - could try and get a ride on it if I can :p :roll:
 

2030720310

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2009
Messages
456
Sorry, I misunderstood. So, correct me if I'm wrong, the 172 cab is more or less the same as the 168/2, minus the ATP buttons & display on the speedo?

Yes for LO and others but the LM ones will look something like a 375 but a diesel version.
 

GospelOak117

Member
Joined
3 May 2009
Messages
215
Location
Eastern Region
Is this unit working during this week?

Any timings for it?

I'm down in London tomorrow and probably have a fair bit of time to kill - could try and get a ride on it if I can :p :roll:

I was on the Gospel Oak-Barking line yesterday around early afternoon to try and catch a ride, but the line was being run by 3x150's, with a fourth at GO.

Also, I went on a 378 for the first time after arriving at GO, it died for about 10 mins at Canonbury :|
 

Dstock7080

Established Member
Joined
17 Feb 2010
Messages
3,513
Location
West London
Is this unit working during this week?

Any timings for it?

I'm down in London tomorrow and probably have a fair bit of time to kill - could try and get a ride on it if I can :p :roll:
172005 was stabled in East Ham overnight and formed the 0639 from Barking pfm8.
 

thewolf

Member
Joined
1 Apr 2006
Messages
141
Well, 172004 was operating again today. Saw it leave Gospel Oak on the 1635 to Barking. I made a dash for it but missed it by a few seconds :p

I did notice it seemed far quieter than the 170s and so on.
 

Dreadnought

Member
Joined
1 Oct 2007
Messages
586
Well, 172004 was operating again today. Saw it leave Gospel Oak on the 1635 to Barking. I made a dash for it but missed it by a few seconds :p

I did notice it seemed far quieter than the 170s and so on.

I read on FMi that 172005 was in service today but failed and was replaced by 172004.
 

Dreadnought

Member
Joined
1 Oct 2007
Messages
586
So that's why i saw Silverlink Liveries 150's at Bristol last Wednesday becuase the London Overground 172's are in service, i wonder how long before we get the London Midland 172's?

There have been 2 Silverlink liveried 150s (121 & 127) working for FGW since sometime in 2008, so was probably these you saw.
 

Simon Poole

Member
Joined
21 Apr 2010
Messages
549
Location
Brereton, Rugeley, Staffordshire
There have been 2 Silverlink liveried 150s (121 & 127) working for FGW since sometime in 2008, so was probably these you saw.

Yeah those were the two but they been with FGW Since 2008? the last time i went to bristol was March 1st and i didn't the Silverlink 150s i saw an ATW 150

Just wondering is there an update on the London Midland Cass 172's?
 

Bastiaan

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2005
Messages
195
Location
Netherlands
One thing I was wondering. Don't know if any one can say something about this ... It's known that LM will keep some 150s when the 172s are delivered. Is it likely that these 150s would get LM livery? Or would they just keep the blue NWM livery (even if they are used on the Bedford-Bletchley service)?
 

Fincra5

Established Member
Joined
6 Jun 2009
Messages
2,636
I doubt they would go into LM livery, probably just keep them in NWM livery.
 

Dreadnought

Member
Joined
1 Oct 2007
Messages
586
Yeah those were the two but they been with FGW Since 2008? the last time i went to bristol was March 1st and i didn't the Silverlink 150s i saw an ATW 150

Just wondering is there an update on the London Midland Cass 172's?

I was wrong, it was actually November 2007 that they moved to the South West.

They also work trips off of Plymouth so could have been in deepest South West when you were there or even at a depot having maintenance.
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
The Central liveried one (150125) was in Kernow yesterday working from Penzance to Par.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
Apparently the 142 cascade from FGW to Northern due in September has been delayed until December, having previously been put back from May. A LO 172 delay is the likely reason.
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
172005 was stabled in East Ham overnight and formed the 0639 from Barking pfm8.

I'm going to assume that you meant Pfm 1? Pfm 8 is for Tilbury Loop services heading towards Fenchurch Street. (If I'm mistaken, I apologise, especially given it is theoretically possible.)
 

Dstock7080

Established Member
Joined
17 Feb 2010
Messages
3,513
Location
West London
I'm going to assume that you meant Pfm 1? Pfm 8 is for Tilbury Loop services heading towards Fenchurch Street. (If I'm mistaken, I apologise, especially given it is theoretically possible.)
It's not possible to go to/from East Ham Depot into platform1, so early morning and late night runs use pfm7&8.
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
Sorry. I was thinking of Barking depot for some reason! I know very well that EH Depot has no [direct] link to Pfm1! I wasn't aware that LO units stable in EH though.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,662
Didn't realise LM were keeping any 150's? Live up north and am hoping for new stock as soon as possible, in whatever form it may take.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top