• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Chiltern Class 68s withdrawn due to cracks

Status
Not open for further replies.

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
Is there any more news on this? i.e. specifically what the problem is, how long it will take to fix, and whether all 68s are affected?

Thanks
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

43 302

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2019
Messages
1,730
Location
London
Is there any more news on this? i.e. specifically what the problem is, how long it will take to fix, and whether all 68s are affected?

Thanks
There are cracks on the ETS mouting brackets - not chiltern specific so all 68s potentially affected. 68018 ran back to Crewe, and no Chiltern Mk3 sets til August at the earliest is what I'm hearing.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,785
Location
Somewhere, not in London
Only the ETS fitted ones are affected. It's not an ideal situation thanks to the design of the ETS frame.
I'm not sure if the TPE Mk.5As use a different ETS or not which would mean a different converter.
 

43 302

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2019
Messages
1,730
Location
London
Only the ETS fitted ones are affected. It's not an ideal situation thanks to the design of the ETS frame.
I'm not sure if the TPE Mk.5As use a different ETS or not which would mean a different converter.
Sorry, which 68s are not ETS fitted? ;)
 

43 302

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2019
Messages
1,730
Location
London
Do TPE ones have the same converters though?
I have it on good authority that it affects the TPE 68s too, so I would assume so. One of the possible short term fixes is to rob them from the 88s.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
Only the ETS fitted ones are affected. It's not an ideal situation thanks to the design of the ETS frame.
I'm not sure if the TPE Mk.5As use a different ETS or not which would mean a different converter.

If so, that's all of them then! The ETS is a standard fitment on the whole fleet - it's not something specific to the Chiltern ones.

The modification to the Chiltern ones is the multiple-working system (additional round orange socket just above the buffer beam), which I understand is a cut-down version of AAR which allows them to be controlled from the AAR-fitted DVT but doesn't allow full multi-working with AAR-fitted locos. The TPE ones have a grey/black rectangular socket in the same place, which I understand is the TMS (those use the native 68 system for multi-working - red sockets below the windscreen).
 

peteb

Established Member
Joined
30 Mar 2011
Messages
1,697
The only 68 hauled Marylebone to Kidderminster (arr 1938) silver diagram to survive the temporary withdrawals has gone over to a unit, it was only a 3 car tonight. Later arrival at 2045 also unit.
 
Last edited:

Buspilot

Member
Joined
4 Feb 2012
Messages
120
Was talking to a professor in mechanical engineering yesterday, who specialises in road and rail transport.

It is his view that the problem expressed on this thread about the Chiltern 68s and other threads regarding failures of various items of running gearon other stock, have a common cause.
It is not the construction of the items of rolling stock, which in many cases have proven themselves in other countries, but the track construction in the UK where the fault lies. It has not kept pace with rolling stock running gear construction.
Sleepers are no longer made of wood but of various forms of concrete. Rails are not tempered in a way to suit modern rolling stock wheel construction and the method of laying of continuous rail in the UK is questionable.
 

northernbelle

Member
Joined
10 Oct 2018
Messages
770
Was talking to a professor in mechanical engineering yesterday, who specialises in road and rail transport.

It is his view that the problem expressed on this thread about the Chiltern 68s and other threads regarding failures of various items of running gearon other stock, have a common cause.
It is not the construction of the items of rolling stock, which in many cases have proven themselves in other countries, but the track construction in the UK where the fault lies. It has not kept pace with rolling stock running gear construction.
Sleepers are no longer made of wood but of various forms of concrete. Rails are not tempered in a way to suit modern rolling stock wheel construction and the method of laying of continuous rail in the UK is questionable.
This is certainly a line of investigation in regards the CAF and Hitachi problems - the fact there's an emerging theme across multiple manufacturers suggests the problem is more systemic than it first seems.
 

matt

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
30 Jun 2005
Messages
8,855
Location
Rugby
Has this situation changed at all? Any back in service yet?

Much appreciated.

There at least one diagram running now. I travelled behind 68010 on the 11:10 from Marylebone yesterday.
 

43 302

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2019
Messages
1,730
Location
London
10 + 13 in service plus 8 for rescue only. Not sure on the status or the others.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,785
Location
Somewhere, not in London
I do have to wonder why they didn't just remove the ETS Static Converters, make safe, and then just run the ETS generator in the DVT?
 

CyrusWuff

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2013
Messages
5,460
Location
London
I do have to wonder why they didn't just remove the ETS Static Converters, make safe, and then just run the ETS generator in the DVT?
I believe the generators in the DVTs were only specced to provide "hotel power" when the loco was shut down, not whilst on the move.
 

warwickshire

On Moderation
Joined
6 Feb 2020
Messages
2,304
Location
leamingtonspa
I believe the generators in the DVTs were only specced to provide "hotel power" when the loco was shut down, not whilst on the move.
That is correct.
Also on some dvts the generators are isolated as well.
Iff generator in dvt fails then train will be a failure.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
How different is the load on a Mk.3A when moving compared with static? It isn't that much.

The DVT will also need power for its cab if it's leading.

But what's the ETS index of the genset in the DVT? Should be easy enough to work out whether it has a high enough rating from that.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,785
Location
Somewhere, not in London
The Mk.3As now have new converters that need around 40kW each, so if my memory serves correctly that's an ETS index of 4.

Image shows a snip of a brochure from Turbo Power Systems showing their "Regional" offering for Mk.3 Coaches.

1626729641711.png
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,827
The Mk.3As now have new converters that need around 40kW each, so if my memory serves correctly that's an ETS index of 4.

Image shows a snip of a brochure from Turbo Power Systems showing their "Regional" offering for Mk.3 Coaches.

View attachment 99932
I believe it’s ETS index of 1 = 5kW.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
I believe the Platform 5 books have the ETS ratings for each type of LHCS vehicle - I've been hunting for the books this morning and can't find where I've put them! Anyone got one to hand?
 

CyrusWuff

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2013
Messages
5,460
Location
London
Galley First Wheelchair?
Correct. Though the serving areas have now been boarded over. :'(

So...A full rake works out at a theoretical ETS index of 50, or potentially 42 if the galley's been stripped out/isolated. Loco wouldn't be breaking a sweat (as it can handle an index of 100), but it's touch and go for the gensets...assuming they're even working.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top