There are cracks on the ETS mouting brackets - not chiltern specific so all 68s potentially affected. 68018 ran back to Crewe, and no Chiltern Mk3 sets til August at the earliest is what I'm hearing.Is there any more news on this? i.e. specifically what the problem is, how long it will take to fix, and whether all 68s are affected?
Thanks
Sorry, which 68s are not ETS fitted?Only the ETS fitted ones are affected. It's not an ideal situation thanks to the design of the ETS frame.
I'm not sure if the TPE Mk.5As use a different ETS or not which would mean a different converter.
The ones with their ETS Static Converters sat on the floor at the depot having their cracks inspectedSorry, which 68s are not ETS fitted?![]()
So all of them are affected...The ones with their ETS Static Converters sat on the floor at the depot having their cracks inspected![]()
I have it on good authority that it affects the TPE 68s too, so I would assume so. One of the possible short term fixes is to rob them from the 88s.Do TPE ones have the same converters though?
Only the ETS fitted ones are affected. It's not an ideal situation thanks to the design of the ETS frame.
I'm not sure if the TPE Mk.5As use a different ETS or not which would mean a different converter.
This is certainly a line of investigation in regards the CAF and Hitachi problems - the fact there's an emerging theme across multiple manufacturers suggests the problem is more systemic than it first seems.Was talking to a professor in mechanical engineering yesterday, who specialises in road and rail transport.
It is his view that the problem expressed on this thread about the Chiltern 68s and other threads regarding failures of various items of running gearon other stock, have a common cause.
It is not the construction of the items of rolling stock, which in many cases have proven themselves in other countries, but the track construction in the UK where the fault lies. It has not kept pace with rolling stock running gear construction.
Sleepers are no longer made of wood but of various forms of concrete. Rails are not tempered in a way to suit modern rolling stock wheel construction and the method of laying of continuous rail in the UK is questionable.
Has this situation changed at all? Any back in service yet?
Much appreciated.
I believe the generators in the DVTs were only specced to provide "hotel power" when the loco was shut down, not whilst on the move.I do have to wonder why they didn't just remove the ETS Static Converters, make safe, and then just run the ETS generator in the DVT?
That is correct.I believe the generators in the DVTs were only specced to provide "hotel power" when the loco was shut down, not whilst on the move.
How different is the load on a Mk.3A when moving compared with static? It isn't that much.I believe the generators in the DVTs were only specced to provide "hotel power" when the loco was shut down, not whilst on the move.
How different is the load on a Mk.3A when moving compared with static? It isn't that much.
But what's the ETS index of the genset in the DVT? Should be easy enough to work out whether it has a high enough rating from that.
Which is more than enough to supply a full Chiltern set on maximum demand, including the buffet.Genset ETS output index is 44...
I believe it’s ETS index of 1 = 5kW.The Mk.3As now have new converters that need around 40kW each, so if my memory serves correctly that's an ETS index of 4.
Image shows a snip of a brochure from Turbo Power Systems showing their "Regional" offering for Mk.3 Coaches.
View attachment 99932
I can't work out what GFW stands for?ETH Index for Chiltern Mk3 Stock...
TSO = 6X
TSOL = 6X
GFW = 14X
DVT = 6X
Galley First Wheelchair?I can't work out what GFW stands for?
Correct. Though the serving areas have now been boarded over.Galley First Wheelchair?