• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Cameras in the driving cab

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tevion539

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2020
Messages
472
Location
The Milkyway
Agreed. I would have no issue with the vehicle doing this automatically without any sort of logging or reporting.

I would be concerned if this system involved recording audio and/or video to an insurance black box, for example, or even data for that matter, because people should not be doing important things with observations about my physical condition that are not corroborated by the assessment of a medical professional. In other words an IT system to assist me, by all means, but not one to dob me in for something I may or may not have done; such systems are too imperfect for that.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==



And that's basically 100% of the problem I have with it.

Particularly as such software isn't perfect. To use a relevant example, the passport office's checking software rejected my last passport photo because I had my eyes closed. I didn't, I just don't have very big eyes. I had to faff about with an awkward process to override it if I recall. Thus I can see that, even if not fatigued, I'd be triggering something like this by the minutes.

In short I object in the most strong way possible to anything which involves "computer says no" being key to my continued employment in any form.
If it's the exact system (seeing eyes guardian) that NXP use, it only records video and audio if an event is triggered. This gets sent to America, which is then sent back to the UK to whichever company you work for. They can only access the event and nothing else. It also vibrates the seat and sounds an alarm.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Towers

Established Member
Joined
30 Aug 2021
Messages
2,989
Location
UK
If it's the exact system (seeing eyes guardian) that NXP use, it only records video and audio if an event is triggered. This gets sent to America, which is then sent back to the UK to whichever company you work for. They can only access the event and nothing else. It also vibrates the seat and sounds an alarm.
The cost of fitting will be huge, then? New driver's seat plus all the kit. Can't see many TOCs being overly keen in all honesty. Sounds like a solution looking for a problem.
 

Tevion539

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2020
Messages
472
Location
The Milkyway
The cost of fitting will be huge, then? New driver's seat plus all the kit. Can't see many TOCs being overly keen in all honesty. Sounds like a solution looking for a problem.
Honestly, not sure on the cost sides of things. I know they have to be calibrated every so often too if from what I was told is correct. Issue with that is, everyone has different seating positions and facial structures. It can often lead to events being triggered. There's been plenty of times when I have been fully alert and it goes off for no reason making me jump. I find if you get that, it happens a fair few times and only in that vehicle. Meaning I am aware that the sensor is there and I force myself to make a point and look directly at it to appease it. Although, more often than not it is accurate.
 

Towers

Established Member
Joined
30 Aug 2021
Messages
2,989
Location
UK
What measures does the equipment have to prevent a driver from simply covering it up?
 

skyhigh

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
6,857
Meaning I am aware that the sensor is there and I force myself to make a point and look directly at it to appease it.
Great, so a system that is designed to improve safety is actually another distraction from actually driving.
 

Islineclear3_1

Established Member
Joined
24 Apr 2014
Messages
6,589
Location
PTSO or platform depending on the weather
If it's management just wanting to snoop on their driver employees, then it would be cheaper to just have an in-cab camera pointing 24/7 at the driver and recording video/audio to the train's black box or to a TV screen in the manager's office.

But then unsurprisingly, no trains would run <(<(<(
 

Pacerpilot

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2010
Messages
347
How many of the fatal rail accidents in the past twenty years have been down to drivers, let alone down to drivers being tired? The majority have been failings in the infrastructure side suggesting some other parties need to get their house in order before introducing another stick to beat drivers with.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,255
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Honestly, not sure on the cost sides of things. I know they have to be calibrated every so often too if from what I was told is correct. Issue with that is, everyone has different seating positions and facial structures.

Yep, that's the same thing I mentioned above where the Passport Office site thought my eyes were closed when they definitely weren't. It's just the shape of my face - I have smallish eyes and they don't open very wide even if I've had 9 hours' sleep, 5 cups of coffee and a nasty shock! :)

Setting off alarms when nothing is wrong is incredibly distracting, too. You don't have to be asleep for it to make you jump, you could just be concentrating intently on the road! I think automatic braking if you're too close and lane departure warning is probably better, and most newer cars are fitted with this so it's not hard to do. (This plus speed limit warning is I guess a road sort of equivalent of TPWS, which I certainly support).
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,523
Location
Northampton
Yep, that's the same thing I mentioned above where the Passport Office site thought my eyes were closed when they definitely weren't. It's just the shape of my face - I have smallish eyes and they don't open very wide even if I've had 9 hours' sleep, 5 cups of coffee and a nasty shock! :)

Setting off alarms when nothing is wrong is incredibly distracting, too. You don't have to be asleep for it to make you jump, you could just be concentrating intently on the road! I think automatic braking if you're too close and lane departure warning is probably better, and most newer cars are fitted with this so it's not hard to do. (This plus speed limit warning is I guess a road sort of equivalent of TPWS, which I certainly support).
Dare I suggest that automatic braking if you're too close and lane departure warning aren't really necessary for trains?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,255
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Dare I suggest that automatic braking if you're too close and lane departure warning aren't really necessary for trains?

I believe the person I'm replying to is a NatEx coach driver, so the installation of a similar system on their coaches as compared to potential rail applications was under discussion.

The rail equivalent to those things (kit that prevents the dangerous thing happening even if the driver is unconscious) is a combination of the driver safety device (DSD) and TPWS/ATP/ETCS, is it not?
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,523
Location
Northampton
I believe the person I'm replying to is a NatEx coach driver, so the installation of a similar system on their coaches as compared to potential rail applications was under discussion.
Yes but talk of road-specific features is drifting off topic.
The rail equivalent to those things (kit that prevents the dangerous thing happening even if the driver is unconscious) is a combination of the driver safety device (DSD) and TPWS/ATP/ETCS, is it not?
Yes, the DSD & Dead Man's Switch will stop the train in the event of unconsciousness regardless of circumstances (after a certain period of time), AWS and TPWS guard against distraction at danger points (although will not prevent all accidents if the train is travelling significantly in excess of the required speed), while ATP/ETCS will, in theory, prevent the train ever travelling faster than it is safe to do so.

Of course the AWS/TPWS (and possibly ATP, not sure the technical details of this one) systems are different to a road-based closing-up alarm as they act at fixed points. But that's as much about the different traffic dynamics of road and rail. The DSD is a time-interval system, so there is still in theory time for a driver to fall unconscious/become distracted immediately after acknowledging the DSD, then accelerate/hold speed towards a point of danger and overwhelm the safety margin of a TPWS grid. The time window to do so is quite small though.
 

Tevion539

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2020
Messages
472
Location
The Milkyway
I believe the person I'm replying to is a NatEx coach driver, so the installation of a similar system on their coaches as compared to potential rail applications was under discussion.

The rail equivalent to those things (kit that prevents the dangerous thing happening even if the driver is unconscious) is a combination of the driver safety device (DSD) and TPWS/ATP/ETCS, is it not?
I was a nat ex driver until May, driving wasnt for me anymore. Lane departure warning used the same vibrations through the seat which could sometimes be fooled by temporary lanes that no longer exist :D I will be starting with TfW as a guard in January, though. I can see it being useful, however it is inherently flawed...
Great, so a system that is designed to improve safety is actually another distraction from actually driving.
Was exactly our argument. A lot of drivers just gave the cameras the "bird." Slap on the wrist "please dont do it again, it goes to head office." But I think that goes to show what drivers thought of such tech...
 

John1974

Member
Joined
27 Mar 2018
Messages
21
If it's the exact system (seeing eyes guardian) that NXP use, it only records video and audio if an event is triggered. This gets sent to America, which is then sent back to the UK to whichever company you work for. They can only access the event and nothing else. It also vibrates the seat and sounds an alarm.
As others have said, it will be the first step. Next they will be able to access via software in the office, then use it towards assessments.
 

Tevion539

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2020
Messages
472
Location
The Milkyway
As others have said, it will be the first step. Next they will be able to access via software in the office, then use it towards assessments.
I believe that it has been around for a while, believe Seeing Machines is an Australian company.
Of course the attached video is used for marketing so they make it seem "perfect," if you will. But it demonstrates what the intention of the device is. If Seeing Machines stick by their word, the cameras can and will only ever be reviewed if an incident is detected. The issue is, as highlighted previously. The use of AI, algorithms and needing calibration, it's flawed and can often be inaccurate.
 

londonteacher

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2018
Messages
800
Location
Chatham
How many of the fatal rail accidents in the past twenty years have been down to drivers, let alone down to drivers being tired? The majority have been failings in the infrastructure side suggesting some other parties need to get their house in order before introducing another stick to beat drivers with.
Regardless of how many accidents have been down to drivers, one is too many.
 

driverd

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2021
Messages
906
Location
UK
I'd be interested to hear if this is a variation on the road version. Simply - there's actually plenty of occasions that drivers need to look away from the track ahead. For instance, you're encouraged to check/write on your docet for station stops. More modern units with TCMS/ASDO HMI displays require driver interaction whilst moving - for an alarm to sound if you're looking away for 2 or so seconds would be an absolute nightmare.

Obviously professional judgement comes into the appropriate time to be "eyes in" rather than "eyes out" - eg: coasting on a climbing gradient through a long tunnel/coasting on greens etc.

Its also a terrible idea (based on described road tolerances) in hours of darkness, as on many trains, the headlights are so ineffective, you may as well be looking at a black screen. You'll gain nothing at all from being forced to look out and may actually compromise attentiveness to the broader train. Especially with modern units, it'd be like saying a pilot is distracted from flying when they're inputting data to the FMS.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
2,283
Its also a terrible idea (based on described road tolerances) in hours of darkness, as on many trains, the headlights are so ineffective, you may as well be looking at a black screen. You'll gain nothing at all from being forced to look out and may actually compromise attentiveness to the broader train. Especially with modern units, it'd be like saying a pilot is distracted from flying when they're inputting data to the FMS.

Just this evening I was driving through a very thick fog, I couldn't see anything at all. I was looking at my controls for long periods.

I knew that accelerating from a certain station, I'd shut off at 60mph and coast through the neutral section. I then maintained the linespeed and listened for the three crossings and started breaking as I felt the train start to turn to the right.
 

Pacerpilot

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2010
Messages
347
Regardless of how many accidents have been down to drivers, one is too many.
Between AWS, TPWS, TPWS+, ATP and vigilance, We have plenty of systems in place that have mitigated against fatigue realted accidents which is why there haven't been any.
 

bengley

Established Member
Joined
18 May 2008
Messages
1,987
Between AWS, TPWS, TPWS+, ATP and vigilance, We have plenty of systems in place that have mitigated against fatigue realted accidents which is why there haven't been any.
Exactly why this guardian system isn't required!
 

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,516
Location
Plymouth
Exactly why this guardian system isn't required!
So three drivers on here give our opinion and its a thumbs down. But some graduate somewhere dreams up these money wasting schemes and it will be foisted on us all at great expense to the taxpayer....
 

Pacerpilot

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2010
Messages
347
So three drivers on here give our opinion and its a thumbs down. But some graduate somewhere dreams up these money wasting schemes and it will be foisted on us all at great expense to the taxpayer....
...and it will have zero effect on the actual train service but you can guarantee it will be used as another measure to discipline drivers. Just like everything that ever gets installed.
 

bengley

Established Member
Joined
18 May 2008
Messages
1,987
So three drivers on here give our opinion and its a thumbs down. But some graduate somewhere dreams up these money wasting schemes and it will be foisted on us all at great expense to the taxpayer....
They don't listen to us :(
 
Joined
16 Feb 2014
Messages
301
And to open a bigger can of worms, stupid amounts of money is going to be allocated to this, yet our locos do not have air con fitted and temperatures in excess of 45 degrees in the little cabs, this year !! thats not going to get any better anytime soon.

Perhaps if said instigators had the same conditions of no air con and cameras installed in their offices they'd have more or an idea
 

theageofthetra

Established Member
Joined
27 May 2012
Messages
3,565
Location
Beckenham
And to open a bigger can of worms, stupid amounts of money is going to be allocated to this, yet our locos do not have air con fitted and temperatures in excess of 45 degrees in the little cabs, this year !! thats not going to get any better anytime soon.

Perhaps if said instigators had the same conditions of no air con and cameras installed in their offices they'd have more or an idea
So why do ASLEF permit them to be driven?
 
Joined
16 Feb 2014
Messages
301
So why do ASLEF permit them to be driven?
There was a "SQUASH" campaign a long while ago, and a token 66 was fitted with some sort of cooling equipment (more of gesture to appease the unions) But it has died a death now.
said 66 i believe has had equipment "taped off" at least one end when i last had it.

I really dont know if the union is actively still persuing it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top