• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Search results

  1. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    GSM-R failure due to infrastructure fault is in the Western Sectional Appendix as I've said. As for the rest of the arguments, I suggest we just leave it there.
  2. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    Hex or Heathrow Connect - not sure which. Several GWR drivers have stories of being at a stand after receiving a REC only to see a Hex or Connect service go sailing past! Saw it myself at Southall about 18 months ago. Apparently this is because one or other is or was at the time still on CSR, or...
  3. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    Yes. Non-technical skills. There are essentially four components to being competent at a task like train driving. To put it very simply, functional skills (reading/writing etc.), technical skills (knowing which buttons to press), underpinning knowledge (e.g., the Rule Book), and non-technical...
  4. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    And not all trains have GSM-R.
  5. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    So if the measures taken are appropriate, proportionate and not used as a punishment, why do you have a problem with them? Or if you do see them as inappropriate and disproportionate, what justification do you have for coming to that conclusion? Manager: Driver, I've had a report that you were...
  6. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    Well you remember it now. And that's what matters. Threads like this can be like the old Mutual Improvement Classes from Victorian times!
  7. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    I don't have a problem with any of those measures, as long as they're appropriate, proportionate, flexible, and not used as a form of punishment. If that's not the case at your TOC, then someone there needs to read RSSB's T1068 Good Practice Guide. If an incident results from NTS failings, then...
  8. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    There's a track debris camera in the non-driving side windscreen on newer Electrostars, which is what the spotlight in the valance is for. The FFCCTV camera is a separate one in the driver's side windscreen. The 800 headlights have to be set to 'full' to comply with the current standard. The...
  9. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    Nope, just trying to help you become a better, more professional driver. But if I were your manager, and you regularly forgot not just to set the taillights, but also to check that you'd done so, I'd be concerned not just by the NTS failings, but also by the flippant response.
  10. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    They may not present a huge safety risk, but are likely to be a significant performance risk. And represent an NTS failing that could be indicative of a wider problem if it's repeated behaviour.
  11. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    Absolutely. The important thing is to reduce the risk of a repeat occurrence. What are you doing to mitigate against doing it again, particularly in relation to the NTS around working methodically/systematically and checking?
  12. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    If that's as a result of your own errors/omissions, I suggest you look at doing some work on your NTS.
  13. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    Indeed. Not quite sure why the issue has been dismissed so lightly in some posts.
  14. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    Depends what position the headlight switch is in. If it's set to 'Auto' then yes the tails turn off when the cab is activated. But if it's set to tails, the tails will stay on (or go to markers if it's set to markers, or off if it's set to off etc...)
  15. F

    No tail lamp displayed - serious?

    But TW1 sec 14.4 requires whites at both ends for a wrong direction movement towards a failed train: So there is a need for the override.
  16. F

    GWR Class 800

    Broken OLE bracket on the Down Main at Southall - the thing that started the problem with 1B05. Bi-modes in diesel, electrics max 50mph.
  17. F

    GWR Class 800

    Ther are still plenty of unresolved issues: doors problems, TMS problems, coupling problems etc.. Not all cause delay, so maybe you're unaware of them.
  18. F

    GWR Class 800

    It was the same in the sense that the TMS detected an ADD activation due to loss/lack of air in the ADD circuit in both incidents. And it wasn't a Hitachi engineer who worked out how to get the train going again on Oct 16th, though you're right about the wrong thing being isolated.
  19. F

    GWR Shortage of Traincrew Weekend and During Week

    There is an awful lot of traction training going on at GWR right now, LTV drivers converting to 387, HSS to 800, West to 16X, all at the same time. The original plan as I understand it was that it wouldn't all coincide, but that went out the window a long time ago, due to the infrastructure delays.
  20. F

    GWR Class 800

    The very first passenger service on Oct 16th had an ADD activation, which first raised the issue of being unable to inititate diesel mode subsequently. I think you're being overly defensive about the 800s. I agree that saying that they have caused 'chaos' is hyperbole, but there are still an...

Top