Search results

I kinda forgot about the warrant - let's say the police haven't executed it by then, what happens when they step foot in court on Thursday?

Did they have to travel over just to be told to come back then as well?

I'm noticing a lot of em-dashes, some very flowery language, a small amount of rule-of-three, but no "Not X but Y" in that. It reads like LLM waffle, but doesn't smell right for it. But doesn't smell right for coherent discourse either

What are the likely outcomes if they fail to attend, or do some kind of mild shenanigans in court?

"Being trafficked" and "being stuck in traffic" are two quite different things! On balance of probabilities, I would suggest it significantly more like that the person was picked up and then stuck in traffic.

Funnily enough, I saw this for the first time today. Image is a photograph of stickers on an Overground train: "Danger risk of death" and "Do not ride on outside of train"

https://www.flickr.com/photos/pete_1957/9155778091/ A picture of an old station clock without seconds.

I still think of a platform clock as one that you sit by and hear it go "CLACK!" every second, with more clacks on the minute, and the hour is truly "clacky"

I suppose someone could try to argue that their position is a "fixed false belief that persists despite evidence to the contrary and are disconnected from cultural or religious norms" But that might be a bit of a stretch Edit: and that is a symptom, not a diagnosis

Essex Road, August 2025

Haven't we seen cases here where people have had bailiffs turn up, and had to go down the whole Statutory Declaration route to get the conviction removed and then go through a process to declare not guilty because it wasn't them? Saying that there is no problem for someone when bailiffs turn up...

Appeal every step through the courts, not appear, and have the ruling go to the other party that did turn up?

Sorry, let me try again - I was posting in a hurry. "to make provision about transport and road traffic in and around Greater London" how far does "around" extend? Is it effectively "Everywhere the light touches is our kingdom" and anywhere that a TFL service goes to? A commenter said they...

How "around" is "around"? And reading that definitions, the narrow gauge ride at the Museum Depot would be subject to TFL bylaws?

Looks like they've made their way onto the gift shop items

Well, I say "test". They had the things over the doors and 001 had seat covers. Could have been training, don't imagine they'd bother making do not board thingies for both reasons

Just had 503 and 001 pass me, both on test

I've told you a thousand times... People use hyperbole. Maybe not 100, but it feels like it! I thought part of the northern line platform changes was adding another step free link from the DLR? Or was it another bank of escalators? Can't remember. Does that lift have a tiny gateline at the bottom?

Oh yeah, I found a very specific thing. There'd be nothing stopping you getting to the rest of the station though? I was surprised to see it - never knew it existed, but Bank has something like 100 entrances... I was thinking that advertising that as a main entrance would cause issues I can't...

I recently discovered a hidden entrance to Bank. But I think this is the exception rather than the rule. I thought that TfL were pretty good at getting their brand out and being seen. I don't think they are very good at making brand documents - read three documents, get three different...