Search results

It's a complicated situation, and there are two ways to look at it, which seems to be at the heart of the disagreement. One argument suggests that a railcard's minimum fare is functionally a time-restricted ticket, and therefore, an excess fare should apply. The basis for this is that both the...

You mentioned that prosecutions had been stopped by passengers in identical circumstances. Now you say only passengers with Railcard discounts before 10am. That is not identical. The OP had both a time-restricted ticket and one that was also below the railcard minimum. Even if the underlying...

The reason for this is that the ticket is treated as fundamentally invalid from the start due to the Railcard conditions. As outlined in Condition 8.4, when you purchase a Railcard, the full terms and conditions will be provided to you. Furthermore, Condition 8.2 specifies that the Railcard may...

The reason the OP received a penalty fare instead of being asked to pay an excess fare is that the ticket was invalid on multiple counts. The Conditions of Travel state that if you use a time-restricted ticket (such as an off-peak ticket) at the incorrect time, you will be charged the difference...

Agreed. This is what happens when we don't get the full story up front and invest time in providing advice with an incomplete picture. In this case, I think the OP has made their own bed and will need to lie in it.

If you've already sent an email to TfL, there's not much else to do, other than wait.

Would the Anytime ticket bought with a railcard for this journey be valid? No. Excessing up to an invalid fare is not possible. Excessing up a railcard ticket below the minimum fare is not possible.

The ticket was not valid because the minimum fare for the railcard was not met. If no railcard had been used, then an excess would be a valid course of action. The question of "excessing up" is a key point. The National Rail Conditions of Travel state that a passenger must hold a valid ticket...

Thank you for sharing the letter. As you said, it was sent to the parent/guardian of the Zip card owner, your foster brother. It means that TfL's immediate focus is on the misuse of the card itself, which is a breach of the card's terms and conditions and the Behaviour Code. The...

Please share a photo of the letter you have received. Make sure all your identifying details are blanked out. With that, the forum experts will be better able to advise you.

First, I'm assuming from your post that you were travelling today without a valid ticket for your journey. Regarding your fear that the previous incidents will be linked, I wouldn't worry too much. If you gave no traceable details and didn't hand over a ticket from the time you ran off, it is...

Based on the details you've shared, it appears the penalty fare was correctly issued in this situation. Normally, if you have a ticket that is simply not valid for the time of travel, the staff would issue you an excess fare to cover the difference between your off-peak ticket and an Anytime...

I think that may well be the intention... close the door and ramp up the revenue.

The English and Welsh legal system does not have a formal system of "plea bargaining" in the same way the US does, but there are analogous processes and mechanisms that serve a similar function. The primary difference is that UK judges and magistrates, not prosecutors, ultimately control the...

No LNER offer in my latest batch from Amex. I've banked £200 in vouchers, so I can wait.

A humiliating oversight on my part. My apologies. In my focus on the historical precedent of the 1884 Mandate, I have committed the cardinal sin of the theorist: neglecting to consult the practical, real-world engineering timetables. A truly embarrassing error. For this transgression, I...

A bold move, invoking a Sunday-only rule at this late hour. However, any manoeuvre that references both temporal dynamics ("anti-clockwise," "Sundays only") and complex geometry ("diagonal flat sphere") automatically falls under the Chronological Precision Mandate of 1884. This mandate...

A fine menagerie, but it seems to have taken an age to assemble. Still, a stitch in time saves nine, and you've certainly made your move in the nick of time. All this talk of timelines and saving minutes can only lead to one place. We must proceed to Greenwich.

And a very brave approach by ITAL! I agree with everyone else - it seems in line with other deals. I won't use the word "fair", and you should pay it to put an end to the matter.

A commendable riposte. While the deep knowledge of the Holmesian canon displayed in the previous post is admirable, the argument contains a small but critical flaw in its final destination. A quick consultation of the primary source, The Red-Headed League, confirms the canon is unambiguous on...