• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Search results

  1. Austriantrain

    Proposed new Channel Tunnel services discussion

    Plenty of examples of rail companies with (legal or de facto) monopolies offering a vastly better service. Look at Switzerland, the Benelux countries etc.
  2. Austriantrain

    Proposed new Channel Tunnel services discussion

    E* is majority-owned by SNCF. What else did you expect? Offer a terrible service, but hinder competition is their entire playbook.
  3. Austriantrain

    The joy of separate railway enterprises (complex fares in France)

    Ah, but that is not inevitable, merely bad regulation (which admittedly is often the rule). Obviously unregulated competetion on a scarce resource (=the most attractive and therefore the most congested lines) that has largely been paid out of public funds is a bad idea. It doesn't mean that...
  4. Austriantrain

    The joy of separate railway enterprises (complex fares in France)

    RENFE I can see, but why is Trenitalia in a bad state?
  5. Austriantrain

    The joy of separate railway enterprises (complex fares in France)

    Being strongly opposed to cherry-picking in rail competition, I do see your point.* However, you might need to allow competitors in on the crown jewels if you want to entice them to run elsewhere too. Let's see how Velvet does; the demand is surely there, but they need to earn money. *And...
  6. Austriantrain

    The joy of separate railway enterprises (complex fares in France)

    I absolutely don't deny that operating conditions in France are more difficult than elsewhere, but most of it is either a political choice (sky-high access charges) or an SNCF one (artificially restricting capacity by operating/ordering too few sets). The "single manufacturer" has been disproved...
  7. Austriantrain

    The joy of separate railway enterprises (complex fares in France)

    It is. But Spain has enabled - real and fair - competition on the most important HSL, so they are in front of France here.
  8. Austriantrain

    The joy of separate railway enterprises (complex fares in France)

    Well, it is a shambles now; hard to see how it could get worse (unlike the long-distance competition plans in Germany which likely *will* make things worse).
  9. Austriantrain

    The joy of separate railway enterprises (complex fares in France)

    All of what you write is really an argument for why France is one of the prime countries in Europe that really, really need real competition.
  10. Austriantrain

    PKP Intercity non reservation compulsory services

    … and hinder any attempt at competition… 8-)
  11. Austriantrain

    Quadruple track for Ireland, Dublin Connolly to Malahide

    You don't need the space to be there already to quadruple. You just need to spend more (either to tunnel or to do compulsory purchases). In any case, Ireland has the money, so it is a question of political will.
  12. Austriantrain

    1912 Vintage Electric Loco and Panoramic Coaches on Mariazellerbahn in Austria

    About once a month, there is also a steam-hauled train using a class Mh (later ÖBB 399, now back to Mh), built for the Mariazellerbahn before its early electrification.
  13. Austriantrain

    Italo to compete in German high-speed market

    Knowing Germany, there will likely be court proceedings now… I find it hard to see how on lines with an hourly base frequency, giving away 25-40% of paths away to a competitor with presumably separate ticketing will really improve provide overall consumer benefits. Yes, you will have a certain...
  14. Austriantrain

    Proposed new Channel Tunnel services discussion

    They and their competitors will, through user charges. Airports aren’t funded differently. It might be that the station operator doesn’t believe they can, but it is a bit self-defeating. If they don’t expand the station enough, not enough passengers will be able to travel. In any case, that...
  15. Austriantrain

    Adding 400m platforms to Manchester Piccadilly

    As I wrote before: If the underground station is cheaper, go for it. :lol:
  16. Austriantrain

    Wien Hbf and through vs terminus stations

    That was indeed my point. But it should not be forgotten that Berlin Hbf - opened 2006 - was planned in the early 1990s. It is not much use criticizing what was decided 30 years ago based on the world at it is now. Also no use building something which might only work 30-40 years later, as I said...
  17. Austriantrain

    Adding 400m platforms to Manchester Piccadilly

    If everything you do is just run NPR-related services through such a station, and if - logically then - there is only a single station for Manchester at Piccadilly, the only advantage of a through station is a minor and in the end irrelevant time saving. In particular, there is no advantage at...
  18. Austriantrain

    Adding 400m platforms to Manchester Piccadilly

    Even without ATO, you can turn a train around in 4 minutes if you exchange the driver (who, on a high frequency railway, could simply "step back"). So almost no time lost. All approaches would be new built anyway, so you could avoid the max 15 oder 20 or 25 mph on approach which hampers many...
  19. Austriantrain

    Adding 400m platforms to Manchester Piccadilly

    I don't think anyone could justify the massive expenditure for 400 m underground platforms only for that. Yes, but overground terminus-style 400m platforms as originally planned are enough for this.
  20. Austriantrain

    Adding 400m platforms to Manchester Piccadilly

    It really depends what you want. Neither HS2 nor NPR need a through station, and there is no reason to build a terminal underground. What Manchester presumably wants is for the HS2/NPR projects to pay for an underground through station which will really be used for other things. I can imagine an...

Top