• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GTR do not travel 04/02/2026

Status
Not open for further replies.

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
6,024
Wow! That gives an indication of the strength of impact I suppose, but there can't be many train collisions where one just carries on, obvious to the fact! It was presumably an ECS working, and I wonder whether, had it been in service, anyone on board would have noticed if it involved looking up from their phones!;) The Control message must have been amusing - "did you know your train crashed a few miles back...?".
Slightly o/t, but it was reported in the thread on the recent high-speed derailment and collision in southern Spain, that the driver of the northbound train, when it came to a stand, contacted his control to report he was stopped because of a power failure. He was unaware that the last three vehicles of his train had derailed at high speed and been struck by the southbound train.

It's part of the second quote on this post (the link is to post 210, not what's shown in the precis):
At 19.45.02 the Iryo driver called the control centre to report that the train had come to a halt due to loss of power, suggesting that it had become entangled with the overhead wire. The vehicles had been ‘plunged into darkness’, implying that the onboard auxiliary batteries were not working. At this stage the driver did not realise that the rear vehicles had become derailed, or that a collision had occurred.
So it can happen, even in a very serious collision, although of course in this case the train was brought to a halt by the damage.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
3,307
I know they don't normally investigate depot derailments, but would the collision justify a RAIB report?
 

NSE

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2010
Messages
1,919
Wow! That gives an indication of the strength of impact I suppose, but there can't be many train collisions where one just carries on, obvious to the fact! It was presumably an ECS working, and I wonder whether, had it been in service, anyone on board would have noticed if it involved looking up from their phones!;) The Control message must have been amusing - "did you know your train crashed a few miles back...?".
Both were ECS
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
7,482
Location
Gomshall, Surrey
I know they don't normally investigate depot derailments, but would the collision justify a RAIB report?
Given the lack of damage and danger (the points did their job of keeping the mainline clear), I imagine it will be treated as a SPAD investigation (assuming that was the cause, of course).

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Slightly o/t, but it was reported in the thread on the recent high-speed derailment and collision in southern Spain, that the driver of the northbound train, when it came to a stand, contacted his control to report he was stopped because of a power failure. He was unaware that the last three vehicles of his train had derailed at high speed and been struck by the southbound train.

It's part of the second quote on this post (the link is to post 210, not what's shown in the precis):

So it can happen, even in a very serious collision, although of course in this case the train was brought to a halt by the damage.
Yes, indeed so. I have also read of several freight train derailments in the US where the driver was unaware of the events over half a mile down the train until coming to a stand! I imagine it is much rarer in the UK though.
 

CarrotPie

On Moderation
Joined
18 Mar 2021
Messages
1,128
Location
‎
Yes, indeed so. I have also read of several freight train derailments in the US where the driver was unaware of the events over half a mile down the train until coming to a stand! I imagine it is much rarer in the UK though.
The 2020 derailment at Wanstead Park involved a freight train where a couple of axles ran derailed for over 2 miles, damaging the track in the process. The Llangennech (2020) and Petteril Bridge Junction (2022) derailments involved wheels that had stopped rotating up to 55 miles before the eventually derailment, with nobody knowing about it until the derailment.
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,908
Location
London
In the video going around there seems to be a Ground position light on the left-hand side view of the camera train, that is showing two diagonal white lights which indicate the signal is off.

However, there also seems to be a main aspect with an Associated position light and that signal looks on with no lights from the Associated position light. But what is confusing is the previous signal before this was a ground position light, again on the left and showing two whites.

Does Selhurst depot have a portion that goes GPL, Main aspect GPL? With a main aspect proceed Indication meaning you exit the depot vs an associated position light, meaning you continue along the depot?

Screenshot_20260207_141216_Gallery.jpg
Ground position light on left showing proceed with caution, two white lights diagonal.

Screenshot_20260207_141303_Gallery.jpg
What looks like a main aspect signal with an Associated position light, main aspect signal appears to be red, but the Associated Position signal is blank meaning the signal is on.

Ahead on the left, there is a ground position light showing two white lights (I believe it's actually for the other train)

Screenshot_20260207_141319_Gallery.jpg
Close up of the above ground position light, just before the collision.
 

louis97

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
2,153
Location
Derby
Close up of the above ground postion light, just before the collision.
This signal does not apply to the train that derailed, it applies to the train on the other line. You can see the route indicator under it, it will be showing a G for Gullet Road, which is where the train on the other line went via to get off the depot.
 

louis97

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
2,153
Location
Derby
What looks like a main aspect signal with an Associated postion light, main aspect signal appears to be red but the Associated Position signal is blank meaning the signal is on. Ahead on the left there is a ground postion light showing two white lights(i believe its actually for the other train)
This signal would only show a position light if going into an occupied platform at Norwood Junction, although don't know how often that is done. There isn't any route from it to remain on the depot.
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,908
Location
London
This signal does not apply to the train that derailed, it applies to the train on the other line. You can see the route indicator under it, it will be showing a G for Gullet Road, which is where the train on the other line went via to get off the depot.
Yeah I mentioned in the brackets above that photo. It was more so to show a close up.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

This signal would only show a position light if going into an occupied platform at Norwood Junction, although don't know how often that is done. There isn't any route from it to remain on the depot.
Ah ok that makes sense. So then its an exit signal.

I do think an element of cross reading and confirmation bias may have occured(RAIB will ultimately investigate). Going from the first GPL which is as standard on the left to then the main aspect which is assumed to be showing danger, it isnt unheard of for humans to look for only what they expect to see already rather than what is actually there infront of them. If driver was aoley expecting to keep following GPls then that right hand side gpl before the points for the other line would have been the confirmation bias they needed to carry on, ignoring the main aspect.

Are there any other depots with main aspect inside what I'd consider the depot limits?
 
Last edited:

Sunset route

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2015
Messages
1,224
This signal would only show a position light if going into an occupied platform at Norwood Junction, although don't know how often that is done. There isn't any route from it to remain on the depot.

The Sub Signal on T10 signal only applies for moves towards the limit of shunt on the Down London Bridge fast line and not for any permissive moves.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

One unit SPAD signal T10 on the Norwood Fork Arrival, derailed on the catch points and in the process collided with the side of another coming out of the departure road / depot.

The train derailed off T1521 trap points and of note there are no catch points in the TBASC area of control and maybe not on the whole of the old Southern Region area, if what I’ve been told is correct on the latter point.
 
Last edited:

louis97

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
2,153
Location
Derby
The Sub Signal on T10 signal only applies for moves towards the limit of shunt on the Down London Bridge fast line and not for any permissive moves.
Ah of course! I always forgot about that. Didn't think it was permissive, but missed the limit of shunt on the maps, so was the (incorrect) conclusion I came to.
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,908
Location
London
The Sub Signal on T10 signal only applies for moves towards the limit of shunt on the Down London Bridge fast line and not for any permissive moves.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==



The train derailed off T1521 trap points and of note there are no catch points in the TBASC area of control and maybe not on the whole of the old Southern Region area, if what I’ve been told is correct on the latter point.
Ah that explains, I did think it was quite far for that to be an Associated postion light for the platforms at norwood.
 

Sunset route

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2015
Messages
1,224
Ah of course! I always forgot about that. Didn't think it was permissive, but missed the limit of shunt on the maps, so was the (incorrect) conclusion I came to.

Ah that explains, I did think it was quite far for that to be an Associated postion light for the platforms at norwood.
IMG_9526.png

The area involved, but note it does not show all the lines that are controlled solely by Selhurst Depot Control Panel.
 

CarrotPie

On Moderation
Joined
18 Mar 2021
Messages
1,128
Location
‎
The train derailed off T1521 trap points and of note there are no catch points in the TBASC area of control and maybe not on the whole of the old Southern Region area, if what I’ve been told is correct on the latter point.
I seem to remember there's a catch point at the exit of Tonbridge Jubilee Sidings that another 377 derailed on a few years ago...but I don't have my map with my to check, so it might not be a catch point.
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,908
Location
London
View attachment 197629

The area involved, but note it does not show all the lines that are controlled solely by Selhurst Depot Control Panel.
Ah now that makes sense. Explains quite a lot that map. Thanks.

Its interesting that number T10 signal is a main aspect signal but then S50 if im correct is the ground postion light that was illuminated white for the train traveling on the main stretch of track towards 1519 points. I just find it an odd mix especially as the next main aspect T10 could be guiding you to if I were to assume there isnt a route indicator would be T16 at norwood junction.
 

Sunset route

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2015
Messages
1,224
I seem to remember there's a catch point at the exit of Tonbridge Jubilee Sidings that another 377 derailed on a few years ago...but I don't have my map with my to check, so it might not be a catch point.

Remember that trap points are controlled and trap facing movements and catch points are often unworked an catch vehicles running away in the wrong direction so are more likely to be found on gradients.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Ah now that makes sense. Explains quite a lot that map. Thanks.

Its interesting that number T10 signal is a main aspect signal but then S50 if im correct is the ground postion light that was illuminated white for the train traveling on the main stretch of track towards 1519 points. I just find it an odd mix especially as the next main aspect T10 could be guiding you to if I were to assume there isnt a route indicator would be T16 at norwood junction.

S50 are points controlled by Selhurst Depot Panel.
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,908
Location
London
Remember that trap points are controlled and trap facing movements and catch points are often unworked an catch vehicles running away in the wrong direction so are more likely to be found on gradients.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==



S50 are points controlled by Selhurst Depot Panel.
Ah thanks
 

BlythPower

Member
Joined
15 Jan 2009
Messages
864
Location
Kenilworth
Is 377464 likely to be repaired or could it be the first 377 to be scrapped..? As you might guess it's the only one I've not seen yet... :'(
 

Class455

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2016
Messages
1,519
Is 377464 likely to be repaired or could it be the first 377 to be scrapped..? As you might guess it's the only one I've not seen yet... :'(
The damage was nowhere near enough to write it off so I’m guessing it’s being repaired.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top