• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

How Viable are Preserved Railways?

Status
Not open for further replies.

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
3,282
Location
East Midlands
There's only so much they can do though, isn't there? Peterborough is well situated for exploring other places, but the town itself is dire.
I wouldn't call it "dire". I've been there several times including very recently and I've seen a lot worse - many places that are more run down, more derelict buildings, more closed shops, more begging. I'd rate it as "mediocre".
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,459
I wouldn't call it "dire". I've been there several times including very recently and I've seen a lot worse - many places that are more run down, more derelict buildings, more closed shops, more begging. I'd rate it as "mediocre".
I live a similar drive from Peterborough to all of Lincoln, Leicester, & Nottingham. Peterborough has long come bottom of the list to visit, for any discretionary purpose.
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
3,282
Location
East Midlands
I live a similar drive from Peterborough to all of Lincoln, Leicester, & Nottingham. Peterborough has long come bottom of the list to visit, for any discretionary purpose.
Oh yes, I'd agree Lincoln, Leicester, & Nottingham are all better; but I'd class them as "superior" and stick with "mediocre", not "dire" for Peterborough. Anyhow I guess this is getting a bit off topic!
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
9,059
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
Oh yes, I'd agree Lincoln, Leicester, & Nottingham are all better; but I'd class them as "superior" and stick with "mediocre", not "dire" for Peterborough. Anyhow I guess this is getting a bit off topic!
In fairness, Peterborough does have a spectacular Early English Gothic cathedral....and the medieval parish church midway between the cathedral and the station is rather nice too. There are also two quite impressive mosques that are visible from the ECML to the North of the station. I would, however, agree that the rest of it is pretty meh!
 

Belperpete

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,626
Getting to the Bluebell when you don't have a car (I don't) means the slow stopping train to East Grinstead (and a wait at EGR for the return, since the Bluebell's services to EGR in the afternoon don't seem to match the Southern timetable).
The Bluebell must be one of the best connected lines there is. The Southern service is so regular that the Bluebell services don't have to match. There is a Southern service from EGR every 20 minutes, taking next Sunday afternoon as an example. And most of them take less than 30 minutes to reach East Croydon.

If a 20 minute interval service isn't good enough for you, I suspect that if the Bluebell did run their own service direct from East Croydon, you would be complaining that it wasn't frequent enough, didn't run at the exact times you wanted, didn't make a good enough connection at ECR, etc.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,459
In fairness, Peterborough does have a spectacular Early English Gothic cathedral....and the medieval parish church midway between the cathedral and the station is rather nice too. There are also two quite impressive mosques that are visible from the ECML to the North of the station. I would, however, agree that the rest of it is pretty meh!
If we're talking about Grade 1 listed ecclesiastical buildings, I prefer the one with a very tall spire visible from the line one station north of Peterborough
 

158760

Member
Joined
23 Sep 2023
Messages
243
Location
Wiltshire
Getting to the Bluebell when you don't have a car (I don't) means the slow stopping train to East Grinstead (and a wait at EGR for the return, since the Bluebell's services to EGR in the afternoon don't seem to match the Southern timetable).
This following idea really belongs in 'Speculative Discussion' - if suitable Bluebell steam locomotives were made main-line ready, then a Bluebell service from (say) East Croydon Platform 6 in the morning and a return in the afternoon would gather many more visitors. Non-stop from ECR to EGR - a very scenic ride. The link to the main line at EGR exists - guest locos use it for special events.
The state of the railway’s finances is already precarious enough without adding all the costs of running a mainline service. I doubt it would even be that popular after the first week. If it ever happened (and I think a Lewes extension and services to Haywards Heath are more likely) it would be using the Thumper rather than steam hauled stock.
The Bluebell must be one of the best connected lines there is. The Southern service is so regular that the Bluebell services don't have to match. There is a Southern service from EGR every 20 minutes, taking next Sunday afternoon as an example. And most of them take less than 30 minutes to reach East Croydon.

If a 20 minute interval service isn't good enough for you, I suspect that if the Bluebell did run their own service direct from East Croydon, you would be complaining that it wasn't frequent enough, didn't run at the exact times you wanted, didn't make a good enough connection at ECR, etc.
There’s engineering works on the BML over the next few weekends, but generally the service is every 30 minutes direct to London Victoria. It only takes 40 minutes to East Croydon and 1 hour to Victoria - definitely the quickest form of transport.
 

Egg Centric

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
2,869
Location
Land of the Prince Bishops
I wouldn't call it "dire". I've been there several times including very recently and I've seen a lot worse - many places that are more run down, more derelict buildings, more closed shops, more begging. I'd rate it as "mediocre".


I will stand by my dire, although I'm being relative - obviously somewhere like Horden is objectively worse but it's a different kettle of fish. Are the places you're thinking of comparable to Peterborough in terms of being in a wealthy part of the country with excellent transport links, a decent economy, and a genuine history (even though very little of it is visible any more)?
 

Jan Mayen

Established Member
Joined
30 Sep 2020
Messages
1,358
Location
Sussex
The Bluebell must be one of the best connected lines there is. The Southern service is so regular that the Bluebell services don't have to match. There is a Southern service from EGR every 20 minutes, taking next Sunday afternoon as an example. And most of them take less than 30 minutes to reach East Croydon.

If a 20 minute interval service isn't good enough for you, I suspect that if the Bluebell did run their own service direct from East Croydon, you would be complaining that it wasn't frequent enough, didn't run at the exact times you wanted, didn't make a good enough connection at ECR, etc.
When travelling from East Grinstead, passing an Uckfield DMU enroute, I have wondered about Southern running an East Croydon to Horsted Keynes shuttle, perhaps during the diesel gala. Perhaps they would have a spare two car unit on the Sunday...

Oh sorry, this should be in the impossible fantasy thread
 

James H

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2014
Messages
1,539
I think the problem is that Peterborough is barely on the tourist circuit.
There is probably something in that. Peterborough Cathedral is also struggling financially, not having the same tourism market as other cathedral cities
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
3,282
Location
East Midlands
I will stand by my dire, although I'm being relative - obviously somewhere like Horden is objectively worse but it's a different kettle of fish. Are the places you're thinking of comparable to Peterborough in terms of being in a wealthy part of the country with excellent transport links, a decent economy, and a genuine history (even though very little of it is visible any more)?
OK, I'll give you Swindon. I think it pretty much fits "in a wealthy part of the country with excellent transport links, a decent economy, and a genuine (railway) history". Seemed like a run-down hole last time I was there, just a few years ago, and makes Peterborough seem quite pleasant!

Although it's true a lot of the "dire" places I was thinking of are in depressed areas.

But back on topic, I think the NVR suffers from a combination of negatives most of which are hard to overcome:

  • Lack of nearby huge city, which railways like the SVR, ELR, Bluebell etc. benefit from; the GCR alternatively has Derby, Nottingham and Leicester put together all very close.
  • Lack of feature stations - only Wansford has any real attraction - although the "new" station at Peterborough should improve matters
  • Poor location of stations (Peterborough in a somewhat obscure location, Wansford not in Wansford)
  • No spectacular scenery
  • No special feature like the GCR's double track or the ELR's two lines (one to Rawtenstall, another to Heywood). I suppose the short section through the tunnel to Yarwell could be seen as a "special feature" but it comes across more as awkward, with a long pause at Wansford in one direction and a very short stop in the other.
  • General lack of name recognition
  • Not in a "holiday" area like the WSR, NYMR
This is a shame, since I'm very fond of it, specifically because of the wonderful non-UK rolling stock such as the Swedish railcar/trailer, and some of the continental coaches with their stunning interiors. But I'm not sure that's going to attract a lot of non-enthusiasts no matter how well you sell it.
 

eldomtom2

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
2,383
No special feature like the GCR's double track or the ELR's two lines (one to Rawtenstall, another to Heywood). I suppose the short section through the tunnel to Yarwell could be seen as a "special feature" but it comes across more as awkward, with a long pause at Wansford in one direction and a very short stop in the other.
But the NVR has the large collection of foreign rolling stock, which I think the general public will notice and be interested in far more than something like the GCR's double track.
 

Egg Centric

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
2,869
Location
Land of the Prince Bishops
OK, I'll give you Swindon. I think it pretty much fits "in a wealthy part of the country with excellent transport links, a decent economy, and a genuine (railway) history". Seemed like a run-down hole last time I was there, just a few years ago, and makes Peterborough seem quite pleasant!

Although it's true a lot of the "dire" places I was thinking of are in depressed areas.

But back on topic, I think the NVR suffers from a combination of negatives most of which are hard to overcome:

  • Lack of nearby huge city, which railways like the SVR, ELR, Bluebell etc. benefit from; the GCR alternatively has Derby, Nottingham and Leicester put together all very close.
  • Lack of feature stations - only Wansford has any real attraction - although the "new" station at Peterborough should improve matters
  • Poor location of stations (Peterborough in a somewhat obscure location, Wansford not in Wansford)
  • No spectacular scenery
  • No special feature like the GCR's double track or the ELR's two lines (one to Rawtenstall, another to Heywood). I suppose the short section through the tunnel to Yarwell could be seen as a "special feature" but it comes across more as awkward, with a long pause at Wansford in one direction and a very short stop in the other.
  • General lack of name recognition
  • Not in a "holiday" area like the WSR, NYMR
This is a shame, since I'm very fond of it, specifically because of the wonderful non-UK rolling stock such as the Swedish railcar/trailer, and some of the continental coaches with their stunning interiors. But I'm not sure that's going to attract a lot of non-enthusiasts no matter how well you sell it.

I agree with all of the above (aside from Swindon being meaningfully different to Peterborough)

I wonder how viable an extension to Oundle via Fotheringhay is? There doesn't look to be a great deal on the old trackbed until you get right up to Oundle and both of those places are an example of the kind of thing I meant by lots of great stuff nearby to explore. Would be substantially more tourist friendly then.
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,691
Location
West Riding
I think the problem is that Peterborough is barely on the tourist circuit.
It's not too far from Cambridge and is near the A1.
OK, I'll give you Swindon. I think it pretty much fits "in a wealthy part of the country with excellent transport links, a decent economy, and a genuine (railway) history". Seemed like a run-down hole last time I was there, just a few years ago, and makes Peterborough seem quite pleasant!

Although it's true a lot of the "dire" places I was thinking of are in depressed areas.

But back on topic, I think the NVR suffers from a combination of negatives most of which are hard to overcome:

  • Lack of nearby huge city, which railways like the SVR, ELR, Bluebell etc. benefit from; the GCR alternatively has Derby, Nottingham and Leicester put together all very close.
  • Lack of feature stations - only Wansford has any real attraction - although the "new" station at Peterborough should improve matters
  • Poor location of stations (Peterborough in a somewhat obscure location, Wansford not in Wansford)
  • No spectacular scenery
  • No special feature like the GCR's double track or the ELR's two lines (one to Rawtenstall, another to Heywood). I suppose the short section through the tunnel to Yarwell could be seen as a "special feature" but it comes across more as awkward, with a long pause at Wansford in one direction and a very short stop in the other.
  • General lack of name recognition
  • Not in a "holiday" area like the WSR, NYMR
This is a shame, since I'm very fond of it, specifically because of the wonderful non-UK rolling stock such as the Swedish railcar/trailer, and some of the continental coaches with their stunning interiors. But I'm not sure that's going to attract a lot of non-enthusiasts no matter how well you sell it.
While the foreign rolling stock probably attracts a very niche crowd, the foreign/uninspiring rolling stock on the line probably puts off many more. Easier said than done, but with some decent rolling stock the line would do a lot better. I visited when Flying Scotsman and Britannia were present simultaneously and it was busy without any passenger trains even running that day. Am I going to drive two hours for a ride on a pacer or a peak though, when I can do that a lot closer to home if I wanted- probably not!
 
Last edited:

Belperpete

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,626
The state of the railway’s finances is already precarious enough without adding all the costs of running a mainline service. I doubt it would even be that popular after the first week. If it ever happened (and I think a Lewes extension and services to Haywards Heath are more likely) it would be using the Thumper rather than steam hauled stock.
Are they intending on having the Thumper passed for mainline use?

And for a regular service, they would need a backup in case the Thumper wasn't available. Perhaps a set with diesels both ends, again all of which would need to be mainline certified.
 

158760

Member
Joined
23 Sep 2023
Messages
243
Location
Wiltshire
Are they intending on having the Thumper passed for mainline use?

And for a regular service, they would need a backup in case the Thumper wasn't available. Perhaps a set with diesels both ends, again all of which would need to be mainline certified.
No. The only addition to the Thumper will be a third coach to add some extra capacity. I doubt anything else from the Bluebell will get mainline certified other than for drags.
 

Belperpete

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,626
Not to mention that the Oundle station site is a) well out of the town and b) covered in houses
And wouldn't it just be a case of an extension from one place that nobody has ever heard of to another place that nobody has ever heard of. Is Oundle really a major tourist destination? I had never heard of it before.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,459
And wouldn't it just be a case of an extension from one place that nobody has ever heard of to another place that nobody has ever heard of. Is Oundle really a major tourist destination? I had never heard of it before.
Oundle's sort of a smaller version of Stamford, so I can see some value - certainly more than most of the stops on the present NVR. But not that would transform the railway and bring in huge amounts of new business.
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
3,282
Location
East Midlands
But the NVR has the large collection of foreign rolling stock, which I think the general public will notice and be interested in far more than something like the GCR's double track.
As I said, I'm very fond of the foreign rolling stock. Also I think the general public might well be impressed with it once they are there, but I'm not sure it would be at all easy to attract them with it in the first place. Maybe they need to use it more and promote it more.

As for the GCR's double track, it's not so much that the general public care about or want double track as such, it's that they can see an intensive service with steam locos passing each other and they can hop on and off between the different attractions easily, particularly when an event is on; the double track enables a different, more flexible and attractive operation.

I've been loads of times and much of the general public takes advantage of this - families get on and off at the intermediate stations to use the cafes and toilets and if applicable look at the event exhibits, rather than the typical ride up the line, do something at the end and come back. I hear them discussing their options as the go along! For the non-enthusiast, particularly families, I believe it makes it much more of a day out and really encourages return. Smaller children don't have time to get bored!
 

The_Van

Member
Joined
28 Nov 2011
Messages
188
Location
The Stort
I live about an hour away and I've driven past on the A1 many many times but I've never visited yet I've been to many heritage railways.

I will try and attend one of their diesel events this year
 

EbbwJunction1

Established Member
Joined
25 Mar 2010
Messages
1,767
Location
Newport, South Wales
I've been to the NVR twice; once quite a few years ago, and once about three years ago.

I don't remember having any difficulties getting to the station at Peterborough the first time, but I did have some real problems on my second visit. This was caused by my train being late and the need for me to take a taxi between the two stations. The driver had absolutely no knowledge of where the NVR station was, and I'm afraid that I quite lost my temper with him; I was giving him the directions and he kept insisting that I was wrong!

However, I did get there and spent a full day on the line, which was very enjoyable. I think that they've made changes since my visit, so I'll have to look at another visit - hopefully, I won't have the same taxi driver! I'll also try to look at some of the other local attractions at the same time.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,390
Location
Somerset
The Spa Valley Railway is making good use of its resources by running Caledonian 812 class No.828 on a Burns night dining special on the 24th of January, complete with whiskey, haggis and a piper playing at Tunbridge Wells West station.

It's certainly a good idea, and it makes use of combining existing concepts such as Whiskey specials, dining trains, and a hired in Caledonian 812, especially during a month like January.

I trust they are offering whisky, not whiskey, on Burns Night of all nights!
 

Trainlog

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2022
Messages
568
Location
Maidstone
I trust they are offering whisky, not whiskey, on Burns Night of all nights!
If it’s Burn’s Night it’s WHISKY, not whiskey.
Yes, it's definitely Scotch Whisky. I made a typo on the original post by mistake.

Putting that aside, I still think it's a great concept for a dining train this time of year and making good use of available resources such as the Caledonian 812 locomotive.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
6,181
The Bluebell must be one of the best connected lines there is. The Southern service is so regular that the Bluebell services don't have to match. There is a Southern service from EGR every 20 minutes, taking next Sunday afternoon as an example. And most of them take less than 30 minutes to reach East Croydon.

If a 20 minute interval service isn't good enough for you, I suspect that if the Bluebell did run their own service direct from East Croydon, you would be complaining that it wasn't frequent enough, didn't run at the exact times you wanted, didn't make a good enough connection at ECR, etc.
The normal service is half hourly, although Monday to Wednesday it is only hourly for a few hours between the peaks. The 20 minute frequency for three weekends is because of the Brighton line closures.
 

Belperpete

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,626
The normal service is half hourly, although Monday to Wednesday it is only hourly for a few hours between the peaks. The 20 minute frequency for three weekends is because of the Brighton line closures.
Even a half-hourly service is good. It is certainly more frequent than any service the Bluebell themselves could run to East Croydon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top