Steve Harris
Established Member
Indeed, that's looking likely (looking at signalmaps). As in original post I did say I was guessing it was a thunderbird, I just guessed the wrong service!Maybe to drag 4L07 away from the affected area?
Indeed, that's looking likely (looking at signalmaps). As in original post I did say I was guessing it was a thunderbird, I just guessed the wrong service!Maybe to drag 4L07 away from the affected area?
Many of whom will be from the media, ranging from the BBC, Sky et al to self appointed social media "journalists". May be worth bearing in mind.Over 1000 now.
Oh yes, I agree entirely, hence why the BBC are "unsure" as to what the train's final destination was. I am, though, surprised that it's not been announced yet by the police or LNER.Responsible media won't report on which service it was until they have proof from a source of authority - too many people will be looking to see if they have relatives/friends on the affected train, and the consequences of a mistake are high.
I would expect a media briefing in the next few hours and this will confirm these kinds of details.Oh yes, I agree entirely, hence why the BBC are "unsure" as to what the train's final destination was. I am, though, surprised that it's not been announced yet by the police or LNER.
Trains passed Huntingdon for a few minutes after 1Y90 stopped there, but only a couple of services.
Because the request from Cambridgeshire Police had not been made to block all lines.Trains passed Huntingdon for a few minutes after 1Y90 stopped there, but only a couple of services.
It did have a green signal to go back south, but that seems to have gone back to red.Train 1D75 has appeared to turn around at St Neots
It is hard to tell if that helps people concerned about relatives. It is a case of bad news travels fast. However I suspect if the specific train was announced, it would cause a lot more panic. When I got my first “that wasn’t your train?” call I didn’t have a clue about the incident. I think relatives would be a lot more panicked if it was announced, as they would have had no reason to know I had caught the train before.Oh yes, I agree entirely, hence why the BBC are "unsure" as to what the train's final destination was. I am, though, surprised that it's not been announced yet by the police or LNER.
The last train to pass through seems to have been at 20.11, so almost 30 mins after the affected train stopped at Huntingdon (1944). That train has been officially cancelled between Huntingdon and Londindue to disorder.
9J63 would have been a "did not call" due to 1Y90 being in platform two. Presumably the thinking was to clear trains out of the area - the last thing that was needed was a train having to be evacuated either in the station or trackside.This one, a couple of minutes later:
Realtime Trains | 9J63 1954 Peterborough to Horsham | 01/11/2025
Real-time train running information for 9J63 1954 departure from Peterborough to Horsham on 01/11/2025. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
It is a real mess with the legacy media at the moment. However one assumes the LNER on call team are inundated at the moment and issuing corrections may not be their priority right now.Sky have just said the train was going to Newcastle. Surely somebody at Sky or the BBC knows about Traksy/RTT or even here?
I think they might be confusing Huntingdon with Huntington (which is near York)I think it's fair to give general reporters some slack when reporting in niche areas... but the BBC just described Huntingdon as "in the East of England near York". That was the London-based reporter and not the Washington-based host.
BBC News at this time of day is produced from Washington in the US. It's likely none of the people in charge have ever heard of Peterborough or Huntingdon.BBC news channel currently stating it's a service from Kings Cross heading north then asking a local radio reporter on site how long the train took to travel from Peterborough to Huntingdon !! Maps clearly not a thing at the BBC.
It was reported as HuntingTon at one stage.I think they might be confusing Huntingdon with Huntington
The initial BBC headline for the online live coverage incorrectly said Huntington (to the north of York), which was then corrected to Cambridgeshire (i.e. Huntingdon).I think they might be confusing Huntingdon with Huntington (which is near York)
Most of these comments are from the London reporter they're talking to, who now claimed the passenger alarm as being pulled "not long after the train set off"BBC News at this time of day is produced from Washington in the US. It's likely none of the people in charge have ever heard of Peterborough or Huntingdon.