75A
Established Member
Well Crawley's started well hit 2 of the first and second balls of the game., and a 6 off the sixth.
The hosts won the toss and put England in.
The hosts won the toss and put England in.
Are Duckett and Crawley the best England can provide?
www.instagram.com
266 runs and only 11 wickets - sounds like pretty boring stuff!The Day/Night test at the oval has hit stumps on a rather wild day.
India were bowled out for 180 with Starc taking 6 wickets.
Australia had to face the tricky dusk/nighttime making it to stumps with only the loss of 1 wicket. The night session was rather memorable. The main lights of Adelaide oval failed twice and some idiot with a beer snake walked through the sightscreen annoying Siraj.
IND 1st Innings: 180
AUS 1st Innings 1/86
It is very hard to bat under the dusk/nighttime.266 runs and only 11 wickets - sounds like pretty boring stuff!
I am absolutely baffled why some people have downer on Ben Duckett.Are Duckett and Crawley the best England can provide?
How, to your way of thinking, do Lillee and Starc compare at Test Match level.It is very hard to bat under the dusk/nighttime.
Zac Crawley didn't disappoint, out for 8 with Matt Henry again being the bowler.
Duckett with 92 in the second innings. Do you want to rethink that question?Are Duckett and Crawley the best England can provide?
Starc is far too hot and cold for me. You can get an over of pies followed by 1 good ball that gets a wicket.How, to your way of thinking, do Lillee and Starc compare at Test Match level.