The lights are visible, but it’s hard to tell on which track they are, how far away they are, and whether and how fast they are moving.I disagree. When on the platform, the lights are visible well before the front end custard.
The lights are visible, but it’s hard to tell on which track they are, how far away they are, and whether and how fast they are moving.I disagree. When on the platform, the lights are visible well before the front end custard.
Also as a 'non-railway' person I wonder how the yellow fronts help at night? After all the sun is not visible for about half the year...!I won't argue with the people suggesting the headlights are too bright since many of them work on the railway and will have worked with them first hand, but I still ask whether the yellow front is that superior. In low-light conditions from afar, is it really going to be visible enough to see before the train is within the too close for comfort range? Many other countries around the world work without yellow fronts and I am not aware of them being any less safe than using yellow fronts. I know we have arguably the safest railway in Europe, but is there actual statistics to back up the notion that yellow fronts enhance safety? (ie. trackside fatalities due to poor visibility).
How many people are near or crossing a rail line at night?Also as a 'non-railway' person I wonder how the yellow fronts help at night? After all the sun is not visible for about half the year...!
Yes and in the 1950s-1960s, the locos and multiple units had marker lights barely better than oil-wick lanterns used for the steam locos of that time. Diesels and electrics were typically quieter and, with no smoke plume, were less easy to see at a distance.The original point of them was safety - a uniform front colour is quickly recognisable by track-workers, whereas a headlight may blend in with other bright lights.
I know, and if they hadn't? It's why yellow fronts are still importantWas a 195 that do have yellow fronts
Well, yes and no.I was aware that NS had yellow trains but as far as I knew that was just part of the corporate branding rather than requirements
Think about a depot with relatively low lighting. Lots of staff crossing the various tracks. Lights get lost amongst other lights, especially when disguised by a dark black front end. Yellow on the other hand will show up better in dim lighting conditions, such as those on depots.Also as a 'non-railway' person I wonder how the yellow fronts help at night? After all the sun is not visible for about half the year...!
But is it actually the case that a yellow front is a significant contributor to the safety of depot and trackside workers in this situation? After all, several trains with non-yellow fronts have been in full service for several years now and yet I haven't heard of an increased number of fatalities at depots in which they are maintained.Think about a depot with relatively low lighting. Lots of staff crossing the various tracks. Lights get lost amongst other lights, especially when disguised by a dark black front end. Yellow on the other hand will show up better in dim lighting conditions, such as those on depots.
Well I would hope not seeing as depot fatalities are thankfully extremely rare. But one thing you would understand if you where on the railway is , that the railway always does everything possible to maximise safety to the greatest degree possible. Anything that reduces the "Swiss cheese" likelihood of an accident happening will be done if reasonable. Which is why in my view, something as cheap as removing the black front ends on some units wouldn't be a huge price to pay for the (admittedly very small) increase in safety. It just feels like vanity over safety (and yet the black is flipping ugly but hey!)But is it actually the case that a yellow front is a significant contributor to the safety of depot and trackside workers in this situation? After all, several trains with non-yellow fronts have been in full service for several years now and yet I haven't heard of an increased number of fatalities at depots in which they are maintained.
I suppose this is something I would better understand if I ever get the honour of working on the railway in future, I am just genuinely curious as to just how much safer yellow fronts are compared to non-yellow fronts. Obviously it will show better in low-light conditions to compared to black. I will at least agree with you on black fronts being less aesthetically pleasing than yellow ones though. I've done some picture edits of a Pendolino with a black smile instead of yellow and, while it could just be my editing skills, I found it quite ghastly.Well I would hope not seeing as depot fatalities are thankfully extremely rare. But one thing you would understand if you where on the railway is , that the railway always does everything possible to maximise safety to the greatest degree possible. Anything that reduces the "Swiss cheese" likelihood of an accident happening will be done if reasonable. Which is why in my view, something as cheap as removing the black front ends on some units wouldn't be a huge price to pay for the (admittedly very small) increase in safety. It just feels like vanity over safety (and yet the black is flipping ugly but hey!)
I dimly recall reading (several decades ago now) that signal yellow was deemed (but I cannot recall if by the BTC, British Railways, or another industry body) to have the best visibility in daylight conditions.Flip the question. Why not yellow?
I completely disagree. With the bland grey livery they look odd and in pictures the look like a superimposed black and white image on a full colour background. They would benefit from a splash of yellow like the 700s!The black and white fronts of our 717s look quite smart, IMHO.
Flip the question. Why not yellow?
Speed and distance??Indeed. LU stock has red cab fronts. Why not yellow?
Indeed. LU stock has red cab fronts. Why not yellow?
The quick answer, when it came up before, was that LU did not usually allow staff trackside when trains were running, so the risk was not the same.Now that you mention it, why does LU stock have red fronts?
(If this question can’t be dealt with briefly I’ll create a separate thread in the LU section.)
LU "signal red" all-over fronts came into being when the red-white-blue livery was adopted during stock refurbishment in the early 1990s.The quick answer, when it came up before, was that LU did not usually allow staff trackside when trains were running, so the risk was not the same.
1973, 1983 and D Stock were delivered with half-red fronts after a trial using 1962 Stock.The "signal red" fronts only came into being when the red-white-blue livery was adopted, as part of early 1990s stock refurbishment.
Staff regularly patrolled the track in daylight hours with grey aluminium fronted trains. Vegetation gangs, signal engineers working alone, Duty Manager inspections and much further back the paint gangs refurbishing the air main and signalling boxes.The quick answer, when it came up before, was that LU did not usually allow staff trackside when trains were running, so the risk was not the same.
True - I should have remembered, since I was using District, Jubilee & Piccadilly lines when those trains were like it.1973, 1983 and D Stock were delivered with half-red fronts after a trial using 1962 Stock.
The quick answer, when it came up before, was that LU did not usually allow staff trackside when trains were running, so the risk was not the same.
I am from an age where you'd see a yellow front much earlier than you'd you'd notice the dim marker lights (see attached).Hard to see any arguments for either, it's clear yellow fronts aren't safer, otherwise they would all be yellow, the majority of this is personal taste and trying to find "railway" reasons for this in my opinion
Possibly because red means "stop" to any train driver (which is why the NSE corporate branding at West Croydon had to be modified, and also why hanging remembrance poppies from the canopies on platforms is frowned upon )Thanks. That makes sense as to why they aren’t yellow, but I wondered why red specifically.
Just TfL corporate branding I guess.
You can have integrated ticketing and timetabling without losing local identities.Why? Because it creates a confusing mess. Some livery variation is fine, but I suspect we will end up with as another poster suggested , just slapping a logo on everything in a small corner by the door and that will be the re brand. The current ugly mish mash will continue. Good for enthusiasts perhaps, less so for creating the sense of a joined up , smart and efficient rail system.
Back in the day it certainly made a difference. These days though Red Zone Working has almost been eliminated which has removed the greater part of the risk.I know we have arguably the safest railway in Europe, but is there actual statistics to back up the notion that yellow fronts enhance safety? (ie. trackside fatalities due to poor visibility).
My only guess is that a black front hides the splattered flies.Speed and distance??
I was thinking more as to what reason there is to have a black front if yellow is safer. I reckon it’s just a designer fad to be different- it normally looks horrible and undramatic (I don’t know why you would waste a sleek streamlined front by making it less visible!)
Red used to be the standard warning colour for an approaching train. That's why buffer beams were painted signal red (something which may have been mandated by the RCH or the Board of Trade, though I've a feeling that a pre-grouping Scottish railway painted bufferbeams green). Evidently in the case of DMMUs that wasn't found sufficient to prevent "whispering death" so first the whiskers, then yellow panels were applied. Visibility worked both ways of course, orange vests were introduced circa 1969.Thanks. That makes sense as to why they aren’t yellow, but I wondered why red specifically.
Just TfL corporate branding I guess.