• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Nuneham Viaduct shut - Didcot- Oxford

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,282
Was exactly what I was thinking and badly explained upthread.
I‘m afraid I’d take the opposite view, that this viaduct/bridge is so short they’d have simply arranged the OHLE mast positions to be at either end of it, and the main steelwork structures would have been completely unaffected. It’s only around 50m across the river.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,678
Location
Nottingham
I‘m afraid I’d take the opposite view, that this viaduct/bridge is so short they’d have simply arranged the OHLE mast positions to be at either end of it, and the main steelwork structures would have been completely unaffected. It’s only around 50m across the river.
However, with the masonry arches at the north end I make it about 90m, so they would need supports here - but probably avoiding the steel spans.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
10,510
Location
Preston Lancs
I‘m afraid I’d take the opposite view...
Please never be afraid of taking an opposing view. My feelings certainly wont get hurt. I learn from them!

Good to see NR at least explaining the problem and the solution to it and that will going some to get it delivered in 8 weeks although im sure they've left a bit of slack in the schedule to cover for further unforeseen issues.
Good. I prefer they under promise and over deliver.
 

LYRobert

Member
Joined
18 Apr 2022
Messages
88
Location
Banbury
I find this bridge repair to be a very interesting job and I thank Stuart Calvert for the full explanation of the job and the proposed remedy (post 515). Is there any possibility of the Forum being kept informed of the progress of the works? - and some pics, maybe, now and then?
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
10,510
Location
Preston Lancs
I find this bridge repair to be a very interesting job and I thank Stuart Calvert for the full explanation of the job and the proposed remedy (post 515). Is there any possibility of the Forum being kept informed of the progress of the works? - and some pics, maybe, now and then?
I am sure there will be. Also, Network Rail tend to do a good job of updating Twitter feed etc which I am sure will get posted in this thread.
 

Jimini

Established Member
Joined
8 Oct 2006
Messages
2,161
Location
Reading
Article in The Times (should be in front of the paywall)

One of the country’s most important railway lines has been shut until mid-June for emergency repairs on a viaduct, disrupting the journeys of a million passengers.

About 240 trains normally cross the Thames on the Nuneham viaduct between Didcot and Oxford every day. But it was closed at short notice at 10.30am on April 3 after Network Rail decided it was no longer safe.

The decision was so sudden that some trains had to be turned around en route. John Smith, chief executive of GB Railfreight, said: “It came to a head within about two hours.”
Reconstruction will continue for ten weeks, and possibly longer, cutting off the route from London Paddington to Oxford and the Cotswolds, and between the Midlands and the south coast.


The disruption, however, is not the fault of management but probably the consequence of penny pinching in 1929, at the start of the Great Depression.
The original bridge, built in 1844 in the early days of the Great Western Railway (GWR), was made of timber, and replaced in 1856 with an iron structure. That in turn was replaced in 1907 with two steel spans, and a pier in the middle of the river, and, in 1929, the abutment on the north bank was rebuilt with a brick structure.

Sources at Network Rail say the only part of the bridge that has largely been left untouched since Victorian times is the abutment on the south bank. This needs to be replaced because it is to blame for dangerous movements — measured in millimetres — that have twisted the railway lines above. Alarming fissures have appeared in the brick arches.
It is not known why the abutment was not replaced in 1929, although it is likely that it was to save money in those straitened times. Structural diagrams in the archives are so vague that the reconstruction team does not know what to expect when they demolish it.

They may find it has timber rather than steel at its core and even the piles driven into the clay could be made of wood. When the abutment is rebuilt it will rest on steel piles driven at least 25 metres deep. The work will cost between £7 million and £10 million, and one source warned that it was unlikely to be ready by the target date of June 10.
Network Rail sources say there was never a risk of the viaduct collapsing. The stability of the south abutment was investigated in 2019 and last year, and a remote monitoring system was installed in January.

When the railway tracks started curving and twisting, a 20mph limit was imposed and then 5mph. Finally, in March, polymer grouting was injected into the foundations of the abutment and at just below track level, but it failed to stabilise it. By April 3, movements exceeded safe limits, and a structures engineer and a track engineer made the joint decision to shut it immediately.
In normal times, GWR operated 168 passenger trains from Paddington to Oxford each day, with the fastest journey taking 52 minutes, and Cross Country operated 32, including the route from Bournemouth on the south coast via Oxford and Birmingham to Manchester.

In the year to April 2022, five million passengers got on or off trains at Oxford. Train operators will have to be compensated.
While the viaduct is being fixed, GWR is providing 200 rail replacement bus services a day, adding 40 minutes to a typical journey from Didcot to Oxford.

The company is also in talks to switch some of its rolling stock to an alternative route from Marylebone station in London through the Chilterns to Oxford.

Even securing sufficient buses has been a struggle — a recent rule change on access for disabled people means coaches are deemed inaccessible, and buses must have flat floors.

Smith, of GB Railfreight, worries that the line closure may drive goods from the railways to the roads. “Customers are beginning to get a little frustrated,” he said. “It comes on the back of what has not been a very reliable railway over the past three or four months.”
Nuneham Viaduct links Southampton, the UK’s second-busiest container port, with the Midlands, and before it closed, nearly 900 containers crossed it each day. Smith is already diverting some goods bound for the north via London, but this week he will struggle to find enough train drivers because of another problem elsewhere in the network.

Engineering works are planned on the line that links Felixstowe, the UK’s busiest container port, with the Midlands, and it is also sending goods trains via the capital. Only a limited pool of drivers are familiar with the changed routes.

A recent report on the state of the railways by the Office of Rail and Road regulator, says that Network Rail “needs to make improvements to how it manages its assets” and said that of its five regions, three — North West & Central, Wales & Western, and Scotland’s Railway — failed to achieve their targets for the year. The Eastern region failed to examine 10,767 out of the 16,063 structures in its portfolio.
However, Network Rail plays down concerns that it lacks the funds to keep its network in good repair. It says it will receive £44.1 billion for the next five years, up from £40.8 billion in the period of 2019-24. It remotely monitors thousands of bridges, tunnels, embankments and points.

For one disgruntled Oxford resident, already frustrated by restrictions on travelling within the city, the latest blow is hard to stomach. John Mair, a former BBC producer, said: “You can’t get from one end of the city to the other, and now you can’t get on the fast route to London. Where’s the transport policy?”
 

Class 170101

On Moderation
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,661
The Times said:
For one disgruntled Oxford resident, already frustrated by restrictions on travelling within the city, the latest blow is hard to stomach. John Mair, a former BBC producer, said: “You can’t get from one end of the city to the other, and now you can’t get on the fast route to London. Where’s the transport policy?”

If twitter is to be believed then public transport policy is no where a priority except for roads, though after todays announcement about smart motorways I would venture to suggest even that may be in doubt.
 

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
6,571
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
If twitter is to be believed then public transport policy is no where a priority except for roads

However assuming that 'Disgruntled of Oxford' is referring to the Botley Road closure as stopping people getting from one end of the city to the other.... That is for a major public transport improvement project, the expansion of Oxford station!
 

JamesT

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2015
Messages
4,886
Chiltern are saying they are increasing capacity to Oxford, what’s their plan?
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Chiltern are saying they are increasing capacity to Oxford, what’s their plan?

They already have. Strengthened and additional services, according to their planning department.
 

Chingy

Member
Joined
24 Jan 2020
Messages
219
Location
Frome
The Chiltern route, a route not really adapted to handle regular freight traffic, is struggling to handle the freight diverted this way due to the viaduct closure.

Looking at Traksy, both 6C58 & 6M78 are causing delays to two class 1 services behind them, each. With no where really to recess freight on this route, delays seem to be increasing due to this very reason recently.
 

Jim

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2005
Messages
3,490
Location
Wick
The Chiltern route, a route not really adapted to handle regular freight traffic, is struggling to handle the freight diverted this way due to the viaduct closure.

Looking at Traksy, both 6C58 & 6M78 are causing delays to two class 1 services behind them, each. With no where really to recess freight on this route, delays seem to be increasing due to this very reason recently.

6C58 sat down at Saunderton for best part of 2 hours

6M78 is in trouble at Seer Green now.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,584
Location
Northampton
6C58 sat down at Saunderton for best part of 2 hours

6M78 is in trouble at Seer Green now.
6C58 appears to be on it's way from Open Train Times now, so Up trains will get a bit better.

6M78 still not moved though.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,700
The Chiltern route, a route not really adapted to handle regular freight traffic, is struggling to handle the freight diverted this way due to the viaduct closure.

Looking at Traksy, both 6C58 & 6M78 are causing delays to two class 1 services behind them, each. With no where really to recess freight on this route, delays seem to be increasing due to this very reason recently.
The route doesnt stand a chance and the delays are expected. You have no chance on earth of getting to Bicester without getting caught.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,584
Location
Northampton
The route doesnt stand a chance and the delays are expected. You have no chance on earth of getting to Bicester without getting caught.
Especially if the freight decides to sit down!

6M78 has now stepped forward to the next signal berth (Beaconsfield) but has a red signal so don't know if it needs examination/assistance. May be a while for the down line to clear...
 

4COR

Member
Joined
30 Jan 2019
Messages
883
Location
W Oxon (UWL exile)
6M78 has now stepped forward to the next signal berth (Beaconsfield) but has a red signal so don't know if it needs examination/assistance. May be a while for the down line to clear...
Ticket acceptance for journeys towards the West Midlands now in place. Notably including X-Country services between Reading and Oxford (and further north). Now, ignoring the fact there's currently no acceptance in place with GWR or TFL to get from London to Reading, even if you get there, you have to then get a replacement bus service to avoid the issue with, errr, Nuneham Viaduct :lol:

(Yes - Oxford might help if you're wanting to go north and can get there, say by bus)
 

merry

Member
Joined
19 Oct 2011
Messages
177
Well, that's a messy diversion. Some trains now running via the LU lines to Aylesbury, reversing to run to Princes Risborough, then reversing again to rejoin the planned path.
It seems to be that some Birmingham & Oxfords that are running that way, with other services beyond W. Ruislip (Gerrards Cross/High Wycombe) cancelled, but Chiltern's website overview is somewhat quiet on what is actually running, I guess to encourage people to try alternate routes, while Chiltern run what they can to carry those with limited/no alternatives.
Shame the listed diversions include the non-existent Reading-Oxford route, as noted in posts above.
TBH they seem to be making it up on the hoof, but it'll depend on crew hours, routes signed, extra paths over LUL lines, pathing between Aylesbury & Princes Risborough, and many other factors. I'd say Chiltern are doing the best they can in the circumstances, not just thrown in the towel & stopped the lot anyway! Still no fun for those caught up in it (especially those on 1T41/1Y62 at Gerrards Cross, now >2h late).
Out of interest, is the Chiltern line particularly demanding for the freights? I'd guess it's more hilly than the Thames valley...
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,584
Location
Northampton
Out of interest, is the Chiltern line particularly demanding for the freights? I'd guess it's more hilly than the Thames valley...
Yes, the NNML has reasonably steep gradients, and a fair amount of curvature to add to the reasonably long sections running at the authorised speed (60/75mph) and the need to keep going as much as possible to minimise the delay to the passenger train inevitably stuck behind you. No loops long enough for normal freight between Bicester and Hanwell.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,156
Location
West Wiltshire
Out of interest, is the Chiltern line particularly demanding for the freights? I'd guess it's more hilly than the Thames valley...

When you look at a train like this one (6M58 from Tytherington, Gloucestershire to Quainton), it appears to be routed to avoid big gradients. It managed to lose over 100 minutes after Westbury area so do wonder if having Didcot-Oxford shut means it would be better to double head it, so could keep time, especially on busy Chiltern line


Of course with sufficient power Gloucestershire - Buckinghamshire might be better done via Birmingham or Cotswold line than fighting for space on southern end of Chiltern line
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Well, that's a messy diversion. Some trains now running via the LU lines to Aylesbury, reversing to run to Princes Risborough, then reversing again to rejoin the planned path.
It seems to be that some Birmingham & Oxfords that are running that way, with other services beyond W. Ruislip (Gerrards Cross/High Wycombe) cancelled, but Chiltern's website overview is somewhat quiet on what is actually running, I guess to encourage people to try alternate routes, while Chiltern run what they can to carry those with limited/no alternatives.
Shame the listed diversions include the non-existent Reading-Oxford route, as noted in posts above.
TBH they seem to be making it up on the hoof, but it'll depend on crew hours, routes signed, extra paths over LUL lines, pathing between Aylesbury & Princes Risborough, and many other factors. I'd say Chiltern are doing the best they can in the circumstances, not just thrown in the towel & stopped the lot anyway! Still no fun for those caught up in it (especially those on 1T41/1Y62 at Gerrards Cross, now >2h late).
Out of interest, is the Chiltern line particularly demanding for the freights? I'd guess it's more hilly than the Thames valley...

This is the major constraint, and the time taken to change ends at both Aylesbury and Princes Risborough, not to mention the fact that Birmingham and Stourbridge drivers no longer sign the Aylesbury - Risborough branch and of course the 68s can't go via the Met.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I was wondering if Princes Risborough would give opportunity to loop a freight in the middle road, but it doesn't look very long.

It's not very long. The Chiltern route south of Banbury is not designed to accommodate long freight trains, there are only limited passing places for passenger trains.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top