craigybagel
Established Member
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 5,829
Didn't catch the numbers, but I passed 3x2 car sets heading south on the Marches today - presumably more sets available for South/West Wales training and route proving?
Could it be they sign Crewe - Chester for when the South Wales services start Crewe and divert Chester - Wrexham - Shrewsbury when the route via Nantwich is shut?I'm surprised to hear Cardiff guards work Crewe to Chester considering they don't work Crewe to Manchester.
Could it be they sign Crewe - Chester for when the South Wales services start Crewe and divert Chester - Wrexham - Shrewsbury when the route via Nantwich is shut?
Whilst it does provide a handy diversion option at times (subject to the service not being worked by a Cardiff driver as mentioned above), I think the main benefit is productivity. Cardiff - Crewe/Chester and return is a bit short of the ideal 8:45 average day length on a 35 hour 4 day week - but doesn't leave a lot of options for extra work once you get back to Cardiff. Throw in a bit of work on the shuttle in the middle of the day and all of a sudden the day is a lot more productive. And all it costs is one extra day route learning for the guards involved.Cardiff guards do indeed sign Crewe-Chester which is useful when diversions happen (which can work either way, both on a planned basis and as a response to disruption). Unfortunately the drivers do not which is a pain when the LHCS needs to be diverted at short notice and there's no Crewe/Holyhead driver available at Chester to do the missing bit.
Yes thats a good point, as before now when Shrewsbury-Crewe line was closed I've done Cardiff-Manchester going via Wrexham,Chester and then to Crewe. So it makes sense I guess.Could it be they sign Crewe - Chester for when the South Wales services start Crewe and divert Chester - Wrexham - Shrewsbury when the route via Nantwich is shut?
Wont all depots apart from Cardiff Valley lines need to sign the 197s eventually anyway? So it shouldnt be a problem putting them on the crewe shuttle or the Crewe-Shrewsbury shuttle either.Whilst it does provide a handy diversion option at times (subject to the service not being worked by a Cardiff driver as mentioned above), I think the main benefit is productivity. Cardiff - Crewe/Chester and return is a bit short of the ideal 8:45 average day length on a 35 hour 4 day week - but doesn't leave a lot of options for extra work once you get back to Cardiff. Throw in a bit of work on the shuttle in the middle of the day and all of a sudden the day is a lot more productive. And all it costs is one extra day route learning for the guards involved.
For all 5 driver depots and 6 guards depots involved, an hour or two on the shuttle is a nice filler. The downside is it means lots of people need to sign the traction. Not an issue with 150s or 153s that everyone outside the Cambrian signs anyway, but it will complicate introducing 197s on the route. I believe it's also one of the reasons why the plan to temporarily put 230s on there was abandoned.
Eventually yes, and 197s are planned to be used on the shuttle. My point is that despite the large amount of crews trained at Holyhead, Llandudno Junction and Chester, you won't be able to introduce them on the shuttle until more crews are trained at Crewe, Shrewsbury and Cardiff. And whilst that is currently ongoing, there's a way to go yet before there's enough to run the service.Wont all depots apart from Cardiff Valley lines need to sign the 197s eventually anyway? So it shouldnt be a problem putting them on the crewe shuttle or the Crewe-Shrewsbury shuttle either.
008 011 018. They are doing the weekly unit swap to Cardiff / Carmarthen to keep to maintenance schedules at CAF. 009 013 015 went up yesterday. Training will continue as last week.Didn't catch the numbers, but I passed 3x2 car sets heading south on the Marches today - presumably more sets available for South/West Wales training and route proving?
Thanks. That makes more sense.Eventually yes, and 197s are planned to be used on the shuttle. My point is that despite the large amount of crews trained at Holyhead, Llandudno Junction and Chester, you won't be able to introduce them on the shuttle until more crews are trained at Crewe, Shrewsbury and Cardiff. And whilst that is currently ongoing, there's a way to go yet before there's enough to run the service.
Thanks, that makes sense.008 011 018. They are doing the weekly unit swap to Cardiff / Carmarthen to keep to maintenance schedules at CAF. 009 013 015 went up yesterday. Training will continue as last week.
They used to going back a decade or more but there's no real need now - Crewe (both grades) and Shrewsbury (drivers only) have that covered between them. Cardiff don't even have all that much work between Shrewsbury and Crewe on the Manchester services these days, for a depot of their size. They do have a small bit of work on the Crewe - Shrewsbury local service however, which will as with the Chester shuttle impact upon the timing of switching to 197 operation.I am surprised Cardiff don't sign all the way to Manchester given they sign to Chester both via Crewe and Wrexham. As the majority of services on the route from Cardiff go to Manchester.
The now deleted proposed timetable for December 2023 showed Swanline as being the last hold out for 153s other than the HOWL, but that's not to say that plans can't change.I have heard that there may be some south wales routes switching to 197s in May. I've heard swanline mentioned but does anyone know if any others may change over or whether this is just wobble?
I have heard it mentioned that Swanline would be one of the first routes in South Wales to be worked by 197sCheltenham/Ebbw Vale/Maesteg will have a few (not all) 170s retained a little longer and remaining either be a mix of 175 or 150. 175s will still be around until near the end of this year so will likely plug the gaps in South Wales. There's no rush to get 197s in the south for May.
Timings in December 2023 even tighter than they are now. Oy units i ever saw capable of maintaining timings were the class 143s plus some of the quicker class 150s and a three carriage 175Sensible thing! Maesteg trains do not seem to be able to maintain timings on Cardiff-Bridgend with knock-on delays on express trains, a swanline worked by class 153 would be the same problem...
Thats good news as it should be better for the timings than 153s which have long dwell times due to the doors at the end of the carriage. Hopefully the Dec 23 TT will be changed and Swanline will get 197s and Maesteg to Ebbw Vale pairs of 153s!I have heard it mentioned that Swanline would be one of the first routes in South Wales to be worked by 197s
I would be really disappointed given the much better power to weight ratio compared to sprinters and 175... Northern 195 were reported with 0.83 m/s^2 which is quite good and not far off an IET on electric power.Most of the 197s have been quite sluggish to accelerate, even in "super power mode". 197004 is quite quick though.
The suspicion on the ground is that CAF have been tweaking the software to save costs. When they were being tested they would shoot off like a rocket, indeed 197004 still does.I would be really disappointed given the much better power to weight ratio compared to sprinters and 175... Northern 195 were reported with 0.83 m/s^2 which is quite good and not far off an IET on electric power.
It is most certainly disappointing if they are not as fast as was initially expected though. 002 definitely had some power when I was on it though.Indeed, I've heard a few people comment that they're not as quick as they used to be. To be fair I guess they only need to match the performance of the units they're replacing to keep to time but a bit of extra pace is nice to have.
The December 2023 timings for Maesteg to Ebbw Vale i doubt a 153 would keep to time on. Put a pair of 153s on Cardiff to CheltenhamThats good news as it should be better for the timings than 153s which have long dwell times due to the doors at the end of the carriage. Hopefully the Dec 23 TT will be changed and Swanline will get 197s and Maesteg to Ebbw Vale pairs of 153s!
No they don't, the WAG wants timings accelerated. If CAF don't sort this out the projected timetable will fall apart.To be fair I guess they only need to match the performance of the units they're replacing to keep to time
If they want better acceleration I guess TfW will have to accept higher fuel consumption?No they don't, the WAG wants timings accelerated. If CAF don't sort this out the projected timetable will fall apart.
Super power mode? When I hear this I imagine the driver pressing a big red button which injects nitrous oxide into the fuel.Most of the 197s have been quite sluggish to accelerate, even in "super power mode". 197004 is quite quick though.
More pertinently, CAF will have to accept parts wearing out quicker.If they want better acceleration I guess TfW will have to accept higher fuel consumption?
They do, but there seems to be huge variation with one unit's economy mode being better than another's performance mode.Don't they have 3 modes, performance, normal and economy? Northern's I believe do.