Fazaar1889
Member
There's an election next year? I thought it wasn't until 2025!Theres not a huge amount of detail in there, or dates or deadlines? I suggest that with an election next year, it will all change again anyway.
There's an election next year? I thought it wasn't until 2025!Theres not a huge amount of detail in there, or dates or deadlines? I suggest that with an election next year, it will all change again anyway.
... Ask people why they don't use the railway., and the number one reason you'll hear is "it's too expensive".
Or/and the ticketing system so darned complicated they can't find...or even know how to find...the cheapest fare?
Erm, you choose when you want to go, look at the price and buy the ticket. That's how it's supposed to work.How can I do that exactly? How am I supposed to know which ticket is valid on which train? This makes me so angry. Time to look into getting a driving licence and just give up on the railway.
Maybe. I too think anytime returns on many intercity / long distance flows are too expensive, but I’m not naive enough to believe that these are the only fares available and I still use the railway because I know there are usually much better deals available.Ask people why they don't use the railway., and the number one reason you'll hear is "it's too expensive".
Sunak has to have a GE no later than 24th Jan but parliament will be suspended by Dec 24 if he leaves this late which is unlikely given time of year. So at best it might be in next Kings speech in Sept 23 given less than a year to get legislation through although given their majority they can easily force stuff through and it probably wont be that controversial with the Lords either so still a window to "Get GBR Done"There's an election next year? I thought it wasn't until 2025!
Avanti have already done this, sadly.
For many I'm sure. The people I ask, the number one reason is reliability - these are people travelling alone for business. A cheap evening ticket and a London hotel can cost less and means you're there on time and not quite so frazzled. Of course Avanti's loss is Hilton's gain.Ask people why they don't use the railway., and the number one reason you'll hear is "it's too expensive".
I think the most worrying part of the speech is the comment 'It isn't fair to continue asking taxpayers to foot the bill. Most of them don't regularly use them (trains), including plenty of my constituents in the Forest of Dean.' Sounds like a shift to road building again - hopefully this govmt will be removed from office next year.
And (because the'ye lost any vague semblence of apprecaiation/understanding of how to behave in public) we get the scounging chavvy **ewipes who can never behave. Ever.people working from home are more likely going to want to go out when they can
I think you may have missed an *. I'm not quite sure what relevance this has to the current topic.And (because the'ye lost any vague semblence of apprecaiation/understanding of how to behave in public) we get the scounging chavvy **ewipes who can never behave. Ever.
These are the people we need to drive off the railway (with abolsutely no chance of success due to the paucity of revenue checks.
99% of tickets I check onboard daily are Advance singles booked through a mobile app. A lot of these are return journeys, however with separate advance single tickets for out and return.Return journeys being what 99% of people make…..
Could you provide some more detail and perhaps references to "many services in the peak nearly back to normal" please? I'm interested in this. My understanding from reading here and elsewhere was that most services in the peak were not back to normal.With the Government seemingly using old data to justify cuts based on lower passenger numbers (despite many services in the peak nearly back to normal, and off-peak leisure travel way up - likely because people working from home are more likely going to want to go out when they can), it does feel like this Government is attempting to repeat Beeching style cuts - this time using Covid as the perfect excuse.
And, even some people on this forum are supporting cuts to the industry so it shouldn't be too hard a sell to people who don't use trains much, and would far rather the money spent elsewhere (or perhaps not spent at all, and simply coming up with tax cuts instead).
99%? Bloody hell - no wonder they are looking at doing away with returns99% of tickets I check onboard daily are Advance singles booked through a mobile app. A lot of these are return journeys, however with separate advance single tickets for out and return.
If the new method is to scrap returns and sell singles for each direction instead, this seems to be what most people do anyway these days on their phones (as it often works out cheaper).
Avanti premier might be the exception. I objected to the fair hike in first and being crammed into coach K so bought off peak returns and upgraded - as I was travelling on late night trains. The £1 uplift from single to return and the flexible return worked for me as I didn't need reservations - and about 80% of the time nobody checked my ticket and charged me the upgrade.99% of tickets I check onboard daily are Advance singles booked through a mobile app. A lot of these are return journeys, however with separate advance single tickets for out and return.
If the new method is to scrap returns and sell singles for each direction instead, this seems to be what most people do anyway these days on their phones (as it often works out cheaper).
According to my LinkedIn feed, they're already working on it!Isn't this just going to bring in yet another management layer sat around posting on Yammer all day?
Those constituents will be the first to insist that their long rural access road which only serves three houses is repaired at the taxpayers’ expense when it subsides down the hill….I think the most worrying part of the speech is the comment 'It isn't fair to continue asking taxpayers to foot the bill. Most of them don't regularly use them (trains), including plenty of my constituents in the Forest of Dean.' Sounds like a shift to road building again - hopefully this govmt will be removed from office next year.
For me the issue is that advance tickets are fine for the kind of long distance journeys that you plan long in advance. If the only option that gives you flexibility is to pay the “anytime” fare that is a massive disincentive to use rail for shorter, more spontaneous journeys. Adjusting plans to avoid a fixed “peak period” is one thing (ie it doesn’t matter exactly when the event finishes or if my bus is on time because the fare will still be the same -it’s all off-peak) - having to fix to a certain train or pay a punishingly expensive anytime fare on a short to medium distance journey with a frequent service is another.I absolutely do not understand some of the comments on here. Advance tickets already vary fairly dramatically across the day. The cheapest priced are at the least popular times as it stands - the cheapest ticket from my house to London next Wednesday is on the 2117. The most expensive is on the 717. It's been like that for 20 years.
Avanti are starting to offer a new service where you can buy a single for £20 from Manchester to London but you won’t know what train you’re on until the day before.Avanti have already done this, sadly.
No one has suggested it be the same for local fares, in fact they have repeatedly talked about rolling out contactless as a solution for urban areas. It would be utterly stupid to roll that out without people having absolute certainty about how much the fare is going to be, so I would hope that they aren't that stupidFor me the issue is that advance tickets are fine for the kind of long distance journeys that you plan long in advance. If the only option that gives you flexibility is to pay the “anytime” fare that is a massive disincentive to use rail for shorter, more spontaneous journeys. Adjusting plans to avoid a fixed “peak period” is one thing (ie it doesn’t matter exactly when the event finishes or if my bus is on time because the fare will still be the same -it’s all off-peak) - having to fix to a certain train or pay a punishingly expensive anytime fare on a short to medium distance journey with a frequent service is another.
The key word there is "potential". Never underestimate the potential for political dogma to totally foul up common senseExcellent news, GBR has the potential to be a fantastic engine for cost-savings, efficiencies, improved service delivery and value for money.
More generally, East Cambridgeshire doesn't have any motorways. I think Suffolk and Norfolk don't either. Why do we pay the same to National Highways as elsewhere? Their main activity in the news here seems to be trashing old bridges and blocking paths.Those constituents will be the first to insist that their long rural access road which only serves three houses is repaired at the taxpayers’ expense when it subsides down the hill….
So where is the (arbitrary) line drawn between local and long-distance? Or is it between types of service (in which case pity the folks of somewhere like Chippenham)No one has suggested it be the same for local fares, in fact they have repeatedly talked about rolling out contactless as a solution for urban areas. It would be utterly stupid to roll that out without people having absolute certainty about how much the fare is going to be, so I would hope that they aren't that stupid
It's clear that I've never been on one of your trains. If I had it would only be 98% as my wife and I would both have had proper tickets.99% of tickets I check onboard daily are Advance singles booked through a mobile app. A lot of these are return journeys, however with separate advance single tickets for out and return.
If the new method is to scrap returns and sell singles for each direction instead, this seems to be what most people do anyway these days on their phones (as it often works out cheaper).
I don't think there is much suggestion that UK passenger rail services operate without some form of subsidy. It is the quantity of that subsidy, and what it buys, that is always at contention.How many countries expect their passenger rail services to operate without some form of subsidy from taxes (either for those services specifically or for infratructure)?
If the train had 300 passengers aboard, you both would be well within the 99% !It's clear that I've never been on one of your trains. If I had it would only be 98% as my wife and I would both have had proper tickets.
I can't say that I've taken a particular note of numbers, but I'm sure that when our guards come round there are quite a few other people as well as us waving their proper tickets in the air for the guard to see. There also seem to be lots of other people queuing at the station ticket machines, and at the ticket office window, so they would also have proper tickets.I don't think there is much suggestion that UK passenger rail services operate without some form of subsidy. It is the quantity of that subsidy, and what it buys, that is always at contention.
If the train had 300 passengers aboard, you both would be well within the 99% !
I absolutely do not understand some of the comments on here. Advance tickets already vary fairly dramatically across the day. The cheapest priced are at the least popular times as it stands - the cheapest ticket from my house to London next Wednesday is on the 2117. The most expensive is on the 717. It's been like that for 20 years.
None, but I don't believe that has been suggested for here either. He's merely said that the current level of subsidy is not sustainable given the level of service that is being provided.How many countries expect their passenger rail services to operate without some form of subsidy from taxes (either for those services specifically or for infratructure)?