• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Incident on 20:27 Lumo train 28th December

Status
Not open for further replies.

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,878
Dialect such as “doesn’t know how to behave in public” completely reflects the self-righteous, teacher dealing with naughty schoolchild way of talking I’ve noticed many times before on LNER (“no you can’t have another bacon roll, don’t be greedy now please”) and Lumo before. It’s out of order elsewhere from the railway and should be considered it there too.
It’s rather refreshing to hear such honesty from the Lumo crew. And fair play to the LNER crew for telling you straight when you tried it on to get something you weren’t entitled to.

If that sort of language offends you then you’d best get used to it before you get down under. When I was in Sydney the anti-littering campaign had the tag line “Don’t be a tosser”.:lol:
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
3,361
Well dealt with. The ones whinging about "the tone of the announcement blah blah" are the same ones that whinge about staff not dealing with idiots like this, well done to the Lumo staff.
Its easy for keyboard warriors to pick fault with individual words of an announcement when sat at home, but when you're in this situation and the buck lies with you then you have to think on your feet, by bringing the rest of the trains attention to the matter you've got another load of eyes and ears and the potential of a police officer or services personnel that can render assistance if it does get nasty.
I've been in similar situations on DOO trains between Didcot and Paddington where you have to really think on your feet
 

flitwickbeds

Member
Joined
19 Apr 2017
Messages
774
It might just be me but I'd rather get to my destination on time than get delay repay
To confirm, you're saying that you personally getting to your destination on time is more important than your fellow passengers being abused in another carriage, and/or a member of staff being attacked?

The only options here, based on the info in the thread, for the train to continue its journey as planned, are:

1) For no-one to do anything about the disturbance in the carriage
2) For the offender to be left on a platform with 2 female platform dispatchers and no backup

Which one would you choose? Would your choice be different if you happened to be sitting in the affected carriage and/or one of those platform staff was seriously injured and it was all over the news the next day?
 

DanNCL

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
5,123
Location
County Durham
It’s surprising the driver made the announcement, rather than the “customer guard”, or whatever they’re called, who would presumably have been in a better position to know what was happening. I wonder if it was they who, in fact, made the announcement.
Lumo is effectively DOO. The ‘customer ambassadors’ do revenue and catering, and the train can run without them if they’re unavailable. The drivers seem to make quite a few announcements on Lumo so possibly just standard practice for them for the driver to do it.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
2,284
To confirm, you're saying that you personally getting to your destination on time is more important than your fellow passengers being abused in another carriage, and/or a member of staff being attacked?

The only options here, based on the info in the thread, for the train to continue its journey as planned, are:

1) For no-one to do anything about the disturbance in the carriage
2) For the offender to be left on a platform with 2 female platform dispatchers and no backup

Which one would you choose? Would your choice be different if you happened to be sitting in the affected carriage and/or one of those platform staff was seriously injured and it was all over the news the next day?
Perhaps the comment was related to on time vs delay repay rather than on time vs dealing with incident?

As was pointed out by some here last night and checking RTT happened in reality, the train made up most of the lost time and nobody was significantly delayed at their destination. Edinburgh passengers arrived 8 minutes early!

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Lumo is effectively DOO. The ‘customer ambassadors’ do revenue and catering, and the train can run without them if they’re unavailable. The drivers seem to make quite a few announcements on Lumo so possibly just standard practice for them for the driver to do it.
In my experience everyone makes announcements. Drivers tend to make at station announcements before closing the doors and the customer facing staff make the rest
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
That’s not the first time LUMO staff have made highly unprofessional announcements. New job gone to the head perhaps. Totally correct what he’s saying, but also totally i appropriate.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


The unprofessional attitude of their staff has been noted more than once.

Written, as expected, as someone who has zero experience of this type of situation.
 

CBlue

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2020
Messages
859
Location
East Angular
How does a disruptive passenger amount to that label?

Besides, lower fares and choice are good things aren't they?

Given there are some "enthusiasts" who see themselves as a sort of bizarre upper-crust railway user - the type who thinks they're entitled to a carriage to themselves regardless of where they're going - the comment doesn't surprise me.

Written, as expected, as someone who has zero experience of this type of situation.

Quite - it's not a nice experience. Professionalism can only go far, we are all human beings after all!
 

Sprinter107

Member
Joined
26 Mar 2019
Messages
1,098
Well done that driver. Clearly that passenger didn't know how to behave in public. This happens too many times of late, making the journey awful for others. I'm glad they made that announcement. Had that person not behaved in that manner, then they wouldn't have been called out for it.
 

cakefiend

Member
Joined
23 Jun 2020
Messages
162
Location
Earth
Tonight the 20:27 Lumo service to Edinburgh made an unscheduled stop at Grantham to eject a rowdy passenger. A young man had to be removed due to trying to wrestle everyone in the carriage. The Customer Hosts told him to stop although he ignored them and said they couldn’t do anything.

The train came to a stop at Grantham although the doors remained closed. The “Customer Driver” made a blunt but yet descriptive announcement over the tannoy:

“Unfortunately due to one of our passengers not knowing how to behave in public we have had to stop here to have them removed. We do not feel comfortable leaving them in the hands of 2 female platform staff so currently waiting for police to arrive. I would like to say sorry for the delay and inconvenience caused, especially to those in the back carriage for putting up with that rubbish”


After the individual had been removed by police, the train continued now running rather delayed
I cannot fault the actions of the staff here, really good work all round. I hope their respective managers recognise them for it.
 

jagardner1984

Member
Joined
11 May 2008
Messages
763
Given there are some "enthusiasts" who see themselves as a sort of bizarre upper-crust railway user - the type who thinks they're entitled to a carriage to themselves regardless of where they're going - the comment doesn't surprise me.



Quite - it's not a nice experience. Professionalism can only go far, we are all human beings after all!
100% this. The other X hundred passengers will I expect have appreciated the honesty that it wasn't some vague "operational issue" but just the quite correct identification of an idiot on the train, completely avoidably disrupting their journey. In a recent scenario, I was working with some security (but in a soft, customer service sense) managing cars exiting a car park at the end of an event. Everybody waits in line, everyone gets out within 10 minutes or so. All very safe, managed, cautious. Always some idiot who thought they could reverse (into the path of oncoming traffic, pedestrians etc) to skip the line. Quick as a flash security barked at them "stop right now" with a hard slap to the back of the car. Doubtless not in the "customer service training", but necessary, justified and appreciated by those around who the driver was endangering.

Have always been intrigued with how relaxed the railways can be with people who can barely stand and large metal objects moving at 100mph in close proximity.
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
Well technically we do pay your wages. If we all stopped using trains, you'd be out on your ear.

Well technically my employment contract is with my employer so they actually pay my wages. If you mean in the sense that the railway is subsidised by tax and fare payers, I am both of those things myself, so you could equally say I pay my own wages. I think it’s about time I gave myself a rise! :D

If we all stopped using trains, you'd be out on your ear.

That happened (briefly) in early 2020. I seem to still be here ;).

But I agree what we call the lever pushers doesn't matter.... ;)

You have to pull it sometimes as well!

To be fair I’ve been called far worse things than “customer driver” in my time. It is a silly title, though.

Lumo is effectively DOO. The ‘customer ambassadors’ do revenue and catering, and the train can run without them if they’re unavailable. The drivers seem to make quite a few announcements on Lumo so possibly just standard practice for them for the driver to do it.

I think they’re also trained up to do dispatch in degraded situations (ie cab monitors not working).

To confirm, you're saying that you personally getting to your destination on time is more important than your fellow passengers being abused in another carriage, and/or a member of staff being attacked?

The only options here, based on the info in the thread, for the train to continue its journey as planned, are:

1) For no-one to do anything about the disturbance in the carriage
2) For the offender to be left on a platform with 2 female platform dispatchers and no backup

Which one would you choose? Would your choice be different if you happened to be sitting in the affected carriage and/or one of those platform staff was seriously injured and it was all over the news the next day?

Yes indeed. I mean the preference is always to keep the job moving where possible, hence there’s little point refusing to move the train over (eg) an unpaid fare. However it’s a completely different story where someone is acting in a potentially dangerous or threatening manner.

There can also be a tendency to get the problem person off (or sometimes onto!) a train and then simply forget about them, so additional kudos to the staff in this case for looking at the big picture.

And the train still managed to arrive ahead of time… Tea and medals all round!
 

htafc

Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
365
Location
West Yorkshire
How does a disruptive passenger amount to that label?
As previously stated, it was a joke making reference to the Times.
Besides, lower fares and choice are good things aren't they?
Most certainly!
Basically its a form of snobbery. As with Ryanair, some media outlets & their readership seem to believe that cheap services are the exclusive domain of the working class plebs & ruffians. I also gives such snobs an ideal chance to look down their noses at others.

(Please note, this is note aimed at anyone here but the reference to The Times newspaper earlier in the thread!)
To be clear, I would never read the Times or any similarly-minded papers!
 

Segedunum

Established Member
Associate Staff
International Transport
Joined
22 Dec 2013
Messages
4,755
Location
Up North
Having had to hold trains before for anti-social behaviour, I've always been honest to passengers about why the train isn't moving. After all, they'll probably work it out for themselves eventually.

You generally "read the room" with these situations. There's a difference between deliberately antagonising someone and being honest about their behaviour.

When I've had someone mucking around on escalators in my station before and endangering other passengers for example, you don't employ the "nice" customer service tone. You tell them bluntly to pack it in and/or get out.

Good on the driver I say. I don't think they crossed the line in what they said and I'm sure they wouldn't have said it if they thought it'd put their colleagues or passengers in any further danger.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,890
Location
Cambridge
Written, as expected, as someone who has zero experience of this type of situation.
No, you don’t get to make that sweeping assumption. Whether I have experience of this situation is not something you have any knowledge of whatsoever; I’m not sure what makes you think in your two months on the forum you’ve become familiar with what I do and have done in my life, but sheer guesswork is distasteful and pointless.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I would hardly call a driver berating a passenger over a PA system “professional”.
Exactly, is isn’t. At the end of the day, the high and mighty tone is unnecessary, and if chums of said driver wish to disagree they can by all means, but maniacs like this passenger clearly was would likely be further incensed by such wording, if anything.

Does anyone know if the situation would have been handled differently had the two platform staff been men, or did the train wait purely because they were women?
 
Last edited:

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
No, you don’t get to make that sweeping assumption. Whether I have experience of this situation is not something you have any knowledge of whatsoever; your guesswork there is exactly that.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

So you've been the driver of a train on which a rowdy passenger has been causing trouble then, yes? I'd be interested to hear the details. What was the outcome?

Enough of the self-righteous entitled posturing, please.
 

O L Leigh

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2006
Messages
5,609
Location
In the cab with the paper
At the end of the day, the high and mighty tone is unnecessary, and if chums of said driver wish to disagree they can by all means, but maniacs like this passenger clearly was would likely be further incensed by such wording, if anything.

That looks like "a sweeping assumption" too, in my humble opinion.

I wouldn't say that your view tallies with my own experience. A bit of public shaming can actually be a very effective way of putting overly boisterous passengers back into their boxes.
 

KevL

Member
Joined
16 Feb 2022
Messages
39
Location
Scarborough
id congratulate the staff for being so honest and the way theyhandled it.

back in the day my family were on a 312 from kx coming into hitchin. couple lads decided to try to set fire to a cushion. Dad was Hitchin mod manager. Lets just say it was dealt with firmly.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,890
Location
Cambridge
So you've been the driver of a train on which a rowdy passenger has been causing trouble then, yes? I'd be interested to hear the details. What was the outcome?

Enough of the self-righteous entitled posturing, please.
Although I don’t drive (though you cannot claim to have known that, you only assume) I have been the senior member of staff in many situations where extremely violent or aggressive members of the public have had to be dealt with - including physical assault attempts on myself - but such experiences of my own are of no relevance, purely because I’m not criticising the actual proceedure of the driver, unless you’re telling me that speaking like a teacher would to his class over the PA was integral to the operation?

And as for that last sentence, the usual contempt is so unnecessary.
 

87electric

Established Member
Joined
27 Jan 2010
Messages
1,243
I would like to put forward the Lumo team, involved here, for the New Year Honours list. Top service.
 

Huntergreed

Established Member
Associate Staff
Events Co-ordinator
Joined
16 Jan 2016
Messages
3,178
Location
Dumfries
speaking like a teacher would to his class over the PA was integral to the operation?
As a trainee teacher, I would likely both fail my university course and face severe disciplinary repercussions if I attempted to speak to a class in such a manner.

There are many in the rail industry who seem to think they can treat their customers like absolute filth as they’re guaranteed to just keep coming back. If I was spoken to in this manner, the matter would be escalated very quickly and I would ensure the necessary action was taken.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,890
Location
Cambridge
And fair play to the LNER crew for telling you straight when you tried it on to get something you weren’t entitled to.
Just to be clear, I was not the one who “tried it on” (rather harsh wording for asking for a second bacon roll :lol:) but the gentleman sitting across from me. My appetite is sadly birdlike these days ;)

As a trainee teacher, I would likely both fail my university course and face severe disciplinary repercussions if I attempted to speak to a class in such a manner.

There are many in the rail industry who seem to think they can treat their customers like absolute filth as they’re guaranteed to just keep coming back. If I was spoken to in this manner, the matter would be escalated very quickly and I would ensure the necessary action was taken.
Thank you, I’m glad to know others recognise this. There appears to be a consolidated effort by many to defend their colleagues to the hills, which often involves either defensive justification or plain denial of any poor customer service.

A bit of public shaming can actually be a very effective way of putting overly boisterous passengers back into their boxes.
I would love to know which customer service department encourages “public shaming.”
 

O L Leigh

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2006
Messages
5,609
Location
In the cab with the paper
As a trainee teacher, I would likely both fail my university course and face severe disciplinary repercussions if I attempted to speak to a class in such a manner.

There are many in the rail industry who seem to think they can treat their customers like absolute filth as they’re guaranteed to just keep coming back. If I was spoken to in this manner, the matter would be escalated very quickly and I would ensure the necessary action was taken.

These are totally different settings, the same as those that @TT-ONR-NRN is familiar with. Of course you wouldn't want to talk to children like this, which is why the comparison doesn't stand up. Context is everything.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,890
Location
Cambridge
These are totally different settings, the same as those that @TT-ONR-NRN is familiar with. Of course you wouldn't want to talk to children like this, which is why the comparison doesn't stand up. Context is everything.
No, it’s quite the opposite, I would say it was more acceptable to speak to a class of schoolchildren like a class of schoolchildren rather than a train full of paying adults.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

There are many in the rail industry who seem to think they can treat their customers like absolute filth as they’re guaranteed to just keep coming back.
What @Huntergreed has said here is spot on, and until it’s acknowledged that customer service and professionalism is reaching dire levels in many cases, or the denial of any unbecoming customer service by staff in the industry continues, little will improve.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
As a trainee teacher, I would likely both fail my university course and face severe disciplinary repercussions if I attempted to speak to a class in such a manner.

There are many in the rail industry who seem to think they can treat their customers like absolute filth as they’re guaranteed to just keep coming back. If I was spoken to in this manner, the matter would be escalated very quickly and I would ensure the necessary action was taken.

The person being directly addressed 'in this manner' was the one causing the problem. I very much doubt if the troublemaker ensured 'the necessary action was taken' after being removed from the train by the police, or should action have been taken against the officers involved too, maybe the offender's human rights were infringed?
 

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
3,361
The apologists on this thread for the aggressive idiot are part of the reason idiots like him think they can get away with abusing members of the public.

He was an idiot, he got dealt with, train continued on its merry way.

Again, top marks to the Lumo crew.
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
When I was in Sydney the anti-littering campaign had the tag line “Don’t be a tosser”.:lol:

That sign is one of the few things from Australia I’d like to see brought over here. :lol:

As a trainee teacher,

With respect, it’s hardly the same environment as dealing with rowdy drunks/druggies/violent people with mental health issues on late night trains.

There are many in the rail industry who seem to think they can treat their customers like absolute filth as they’re guaranteed to just keep coming back.

I don’t think we want this particular “customer” back. If only it was possible to ban people like this from the railway in the way airlines do!
 

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
3,361
No, it’s quite the opposite, I would say it was more acceptable to speak to a class of schoolchildren like a class of schoolchildren rather than a train full of paying adults.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


What @Huntergreed has said here is spot on, and until it’s acknowledged that customer service and professionalism is reaching dire levels in many cases, or the denial of any unbecoming customer service by staff in the industry continues, little will improve.
You're literally sticking up for an aggressive drunk idiot who was making the majority of customers journey a misery, the action taken was fantastic customer service for the rest of the customers on the train being abused by this idiot, they were made to feel safe by the crew by dealing with it.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,890
Location
Cambridge
The person being directly addressed 'in this manner' was the one causing the problem. I very much doubt if the troublemaker ensured 'the necessary action was taken' after being removed from the train by the police, or should action have been taken against the officers involved too, maybe the offender's human rights were infringed?
The apologists on this thread for the aggressive idiot are part of the reason idiots like him think they can get away with abusing members of the public.

He was an idiot, he got dealt with, train continued on its merry way.

Again, top marks to the Lumo crew.

It’s less the defence of the thug, and more the professionalism of the announcement made to the rest of the train, how that comes across as self-righteous and treats the passengers in general like a bunch of students (I mean come on - “Learns to behave”) and is reflective of the attitude being increasingly communicated to customers.
 

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
3,361
I don’t think we want this particular “customer” back. If only it was possible to ban people like this from the railway in the way airlines do!
Spot on!
 

66701GBRF

Member
Joined
3 Jun 2017
Messages
913
As a trainee teacher, I would likely both fail my university course and face severe disciplinary repercussions if I attempted to speak to a class in such a manner.

There are many in the rail industry who seem to think they can treat their customers like absolute filth as they’re guaranteed to just keep coming back. If I was spoken to in this manner, the matter would be escalated very quickly and I would ensure the necessary action was taken.

Are you the type of person to cause disruption and generally be abusive? If not then I don’t think you have to worry about being spoken to in that manner. If you are then I really doubt anyone would give two hoots about action you would try and take or that you wouldn’t use the service again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top