Interesting. I was on leave myself today. I won't be on Monday so will be interesting to see what it's like. Actually looking forward to it.It seems plenty of commuters took their holidays from today.
Interesting. I was on leave myself today. I won't be on Monday so will be interesting to see what it's like. Actually looking forward to it.It seems plenty of commuters took their holidays from today.
Interesting. I was on leave myself today. I won't be on Monday so will be interesting to see what it's like. Actually looking forward to it.
They said the Olympics would be busy and it wasn't. Anyway I see that there is a signalling fault between Ascot and Wokingham that is affecting the North Downs Line and that is mentioned on the live departure board for Guildford.I am glad you are because I am certainly not. It's going to be a busy 3 weeks.
I see there are some trains from Waterloo delayed but no reason given, so don't know if it's the works delaying them or something else.
There is a note at Surbtion about queueing for 20 minutes during peak times, so perhaps they are expecting it still to be busy there. I guess all will be revealed on Monday, if people go to Twitter to complain, as I'm sure some will.
No payouts for Waterloo chapel.
Graeme Paton, Transport Correspondent
Thousands of passengers embroiled in the worst rail disruption for years could be denied compensation despite being forced to endure a substandard service for almost a month.
The passe he watchdog has urged the government to intervene to reimburse travellers who will face chaos following the partial shutdown of London Waterloo, Britain's busiest railway station.
It also emerged that enhanced compensation measures which has been due to be introduced a few weeks into the work will be suspended amid concerns that it would cost the line's operator too much money.
From today, passengers across the south of England will be hit by the closure of almost half of the platforms at Waterloo for more than three weeks. Platforms will be extended to accommodate longer trains.
Network Rail has already warned of queues of up to 60 minutes at some stations, the impact being felt across south London, Surrey, Hampshire, Berkshire, Wiltshire and Dorset.
Seven stations across the South West Trains network, which runs into Waterloo, will be shut during the work. A further 20 will be running "significantly" fewer trains. In total 190 stations are expected to be unusually busy at peak times, including those as far west as Yeovil and Exeter.
However it emerged yesterday that many passengers will be unable to provide claim full compensation for disruption because of rules that allow operators to run a significantly reduced service as long as they have wearned passengers in advance.
The Times has a report about Waterloo blockade on page 12 of it's print edition today. Unsurprisingly it's negative and they are reporting something as if it's just been found out when it's been known for a while ir at least most of it has been known, if not all of it. Perhaps there transport corrispondant was on holiday this part month or two.
And on it goes. The only new thing I learnt from that, apart from a Transport Focus comment, was that the new operator are delaying their 15 minutes compensation scheme by a week.
Perhaps in all future weekend engineering works compensation should be relaxed so long as the operator is no financially worse or better off.
I assume no passengers will be financially disadvantaged by these works because alternative transport arrangements for the same ticket prices exist.
One benefit I have noticed today, is the amount of 444s out and about today, rather than the usual endless 450s.
Is that 444s on the Portsmouth Direct? It's been solidly 450s only since 2005 and before that it was Class 423s exclusively on Saturdays!
Correct. The same amount of trains will run but Wimbledon panel will allocate platforms for services on a train by train basis. It is actually a rather complex operation.
Hows that going to work for the evening peaks though? TRain A on Monday departing from 20, next day from 21, the following day from 23 then back to 20 the following day isn't this a recipe for passenger congestion on the concourse? I noted that access to / from 19 / 20 last week wasn't as well signposted as it could be it seemed. I'm not a regular user of Waterloo either.
I see there are some trains from Waterloo delayed but no reason given, so don't know if it's the works delaying them or something else.
Interesting that they didn't skip Berrylands. Maybe that was due to it having less trains running through it.There was a signal failure between Waterloo and Clapham Junction this morning which appeared to bite at around 09.00 and resulted in several 30 min + delays and some trains being sent fast to regain schedules.
Missing out five stops didn't save much time on this one though!
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/W35815/2017/08/05
...which was rather annoying when changing at Raynes Park for Surbiton in order to get to Hampton Court from Epsom!
( Having missed the previous one http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/W35810/2017/08/05 by literally ten seconds! )
The Times has a report about Waterloo blockade on page 12 of it's print edition today. Unsurprisingly it's negative and they are reporting something as if it's just been found out when it's been known for a while ir at least most of it has been known, if not all of it. Perhaps there transport corrispondant was on holiday this part month or two.
And on it goes. The only new thing I learnt from that, apart from a Transport Focus comment, was that the new operator are delaying their 15 minutes compensation scheme by a week.
Perhaps in all future weekend engineering works compensation should be relaxed so long as the operator is no financially worse or better off.
I assume no passengers will be financially disadvantaged by these works because alternative transport arrangements for the same ticket prices exist.
Correct. The same amount of trains will run but Wimbledon panel will allocate platforms for services on a train by train basis. It is actually a rather complex operation.
All trains in the country outside the former NSE area could stop and the average transport correspondent wouldn't notice!I don't think the media are being realistic, at all. Nowadays they seem to be constantly suggesting that pre-emptive refunds of season tickets should be made whenever engineering work needs a blockade and/or diversions.
I guess in a couple of weeks they'll bet singing the same song about the WCML blockade?
I can't think of many cases where blanket fare reductions have been planned in advance of engineering works, just because they impact weekday peaks. The London Bridge area reductions were a response AFTER it had proved impossible to run even the planned reduced timetable, IIRC.
Maybe they should also reduce walk up fares on all the weekends across the country when engineering works take place, and make them more costly all round as well. I suppose the typical transport correspondent doesn't notice any of that happening...
There are alternative arrangements but they are slower and far less convenient, and a degradation in the service that has been paid for by season ticket holders.
If you ordered a £30 steak in a posh restaurant and then got served a Big Mac because he steak wasn't available, would you happy because you weren't financially disadvantaged?
Given that the fact that steak wouldn't be available has been advertised since at least the beginning of the year if not longer then a goodly number of ticket holders should have been aware of this at the time of purchase making it very much 'what they paid for'. I agree, for others who bought before the news was released (if there are any) then the issue at be a little more blurred.
I seem to remember the initial publicity was around this time last year.
If you ordered a £30 steak in a posh restaurant and then got served a Big Mac because he steak wasn't available, would you happy because you weren't financially disadvantaged?
It could be argued that when you bought your steak you were told that it would be a big mac for a certain length of time or all of the time. Then you decide if you'd rather the big mac.There are alternative arrangements but they are slower and far less convenient, and a degradation in the service that has been paid for by season ticket holders.
If you ordered a £30 steak in a posh restaurant and then got served a Big Mac because he steak wasn't available, would you happy because you weren't financially disadvantaged?
One might argue the steaks are overpriced unless you buy multiple of them or that other companies charge big mac prices for one off steaks and not much discount off that if buying multiple steaks.Longish distance season ticket holders on SWT already pay some of the lowest (relative to Anytime) prices for their travel. If you like your analogies, they already get steak for the price of a Big Mac...
Is it not the case that when the work is finished Reading trains will use platforms 20 - 23 which are long enough already?https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/27103...pgrade-platforms-south-west-trains-cancelled/
The comment at the bottom of this article sums it up of peoples lack of knowledge and thinking they know better.Or at least they think so.I'm glad this person knows the Waterloo Station layout so well and could see why this would not work.
Platforms are being lengthened at stations along the Reading line to take longer trains with more carriages.
Already done,except at Waterloo? Though the platforms at Waterloo being extended aren't generally used for Reading trains.
Is it not the case that when the work is finished Reading trains will use platforms 20 - 23 which are long enough already?
My understaning is that plats 20-24 will have 12 car capacity, not just 10. Happy to be corrected.
Does anyone have any pics to show how close to buffers the stopping points are, and how much space at country end before the starting signals?