Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
Having a partner who works on the team who enforces these, its suprising how many multiple offenders there are.......
Then get them under RoRA and actually prosecute.
It's the £80 "blackmail" I don't like.
Having a partner who works on the team who enforces these, its suprising how many multiple offenders there are.......
Then get them under RoRA and actually prosecute.
It's the £80 "blackmail" I don't like.
But it might be a dissuading factor against adding extra ones? Or does it not apply to those in excess of the number specified?
Perhaps they could pack in the Penalty Fakes too?
Why aren't there more PERTIS machines outside of the NSE area?
If a full-blown TVM is out of the question, then the nominal PERTIS is surely better than nothing, save from the "hassle" of someone having to empty and fill them.
Even if security of the nominal amounts of money in it is a problem, they can be free - just push to take a voucher, exchange for a fare.
Not sure if that's a solution. At some stations you'd probably get groups of teenagers emptying the machine of all the vouchers if you could just take one without inserting any coins.
Not sure if that's a solution. At some stations you'd probably get groups of teenagers emptying the machine of all the vouchers if you could just take one without inserting any coins.
If the process of issuing one is sufficiently long-winded, I doubt it. It needn't be "push the button for one, keep hold for a long time for 10". A touch screen interface could be used, using relatively cheap Android tablet based functionality, with a flow along the lines of:
"Which direction are you travelling" (towards Manchester/towards Southport)
"How many passengers are travelling together" (enter a number)
"Please note that you must purchase a ticket for your full journey at the first opportunity and produce this Permit when you do if requested. Please note you may receive a Penalty Fare or be prosecuted if you do not, or if you attempt to leave your destination station without purchasing a ticket there if there is an opportunity to do so." (press OK)
<ticket is issued with the number of passengers on it>
That's probably long-winded enough that the local yoof would soon get bored and there wouldn't end up being a load dumped on the floor, but not long winded enough for it to be annoying.
But how much would that save over installing a card TVM and which gives an option to print a voucher if you don't want to pay by card?
5) Northernrail is not like Southern. It heavily depends on revenue from on board staff, and STM's staff positioned in key locations in the morning rush. People say DCO is the thin end of the wedge, in the long term perhaps, but not in this franchise's lifetime it isn't. Northern has been starved of investment for decades unlike the South of England. It will take years to get anywhere near where London based services are.
3) Northern management are saying that no decisions have yet been taken regarding any aspect of where, how, or what routes DCO will be introduced. There is no reason not to believe this at this stage.
Presumably Northern will be expecting fewer TVM transactions in the future compared to now because of the presumed increased use of mobile ticketing and smartcards such as Get Me There.
The requirement to introduce DCO of 50% of network miles has to be done by the 1st of Jan 2020, not franchise end . Also the east will see plenty of the new trains. They are planned to run on the Leeds-Lincoln, Sheffield -Hull, Sheffield -Doncaster (fast), York-Bpn, Nott-Bradford, Lds-Skipton/Ilkley and Leeds-Doncaster. The first services are due to run by May 2018. Does anyone really believe Northern don't know the plan when the fleet plan for new trains is already out there.
Arriva bid on a franchise where DOO/DCO was in the contract, for them not to have a plan going into the franchise would be foolhardy, 'though they might come up with an alternative. Given how little the management give away, even to staff, I do not believe there isn't a plan, they just don't want to share it yet.
Sadly War has already started which the ballot result will most likely show. People want answers from Arriva but none are forthcoming which gets people even more worried about their jobs. Its a horrible situation.
War has not started with me, and not many of my colleagues are worried either. Some accept changes are coming, some more determined to fight them than others. Nobody expects to lose their jobs.
You know, the thing about all this is that once strikes begin, talking stops. This is what happened at Southern, and as a result trench warfare broke out. I would much prefer the RMT to wait to see what is proposed and then set about reaching a sensible agreement that benefits staff, Arriva, and the travelling public. I'm not a sheep that will be led by anyone. I can make my own mind up when the time is right, and that time is not now.
War has not started with me, and not many of my colleagues are worried either. Some accept changes are coming, some more determined to fight them than others. Nobody expects to lose their jobs.
You know, the thing about all this is that once strikes begin, talking stops. This is what happened at Southern, and as a result trench warfare broke out. I would much prefer the RMT to wait to see what is proposed and then set about reaching a sensible agreement that benefits staff, Arriva, and the travelling public. I'm not a sheep that will be led by anyone. I can make my own mind up when the time is right, and that time is not now.
Whilst I see and can appreciate this view . I think think some people feel that the company already has its plans in place for what it intends to do and so it should make them known to the RMT and its members so they can decide how it feels about those plans .
I also think that from the Unions point of view , the position is a complete objection to any introduction of DOO and the company have made clear that they are unable to guarantee a second safety critical member of train crew on every change responsible for dispatching the train . What more is there to talk about , the companies lack of guarantee flies right in the face of the unions policy in this area . As much as Id rather not be in this situation its inevitable when the company adopts a position that is in direct opposition of the RMT's stated view a dispute is then formed .
I think the franchise knows what the roadmap is , why not just get it out in the open . Instead of people speculating . I think I know what it is , im sure you think you know what it is but unless they give the RMT anything concrete to work with then you just have to go off the facts that they have given , one of which is that their plan does not guarantee a second member of traincrew with responsibility for dispatch on every train . It could be that the franchise wants to retain a guarantee of a second member of traincew on every train with PTS, route and traction knowledge and even dispatch competency as a contingency if something goes wrong with the drivers PTI equipment .But unless they say this we are just guessing . At least the RMT has already put their cards on the table offering a scotrail deal which was flatly rejected .I actually made the point that no one knows what the roadmap is.....so not quite sure what we are fighting for. But if it turns out that no guard will lose his or her job and will retain the same salary and benefits as they do now with the removal of door duties, I m not quite sure what the point of industrial action would be?
It depends on what basis that salary retention deal is . Is it that you retain today's salary with no future increases for an indefinite period even the percentage based increases other grades will get . Or is it that you retain today's salary and get all future increases negotiated in the current way .
In the short run I am sure that having less duties/responsibilities but retaining salary would be great . In the long run as soon as the firing pistol goes off on the job being deskilled the countdown begins on the existence of the role altogether . It might take years until all routes and traction are DCO compatible . But at some point in the future the franchise will be let on the basis of reducing taxpayer subsidy even more and the role will be identified as one that can be scrapped or replaced by agency staff .
Dont know to be honest.....but bear in mind that Northern have had a couple of rounds of Voluntary Severance in the last 3 years or so.....I ve no doubt some of the long time older guys would be glad to get out anyway with a decent pension etc.
If they offer anything like that in the near future . Not forgetting that they are often not available to traincrew even though we know exceptions are made . Also not forgetting that the overall plan in the franchise is for more employees than before , including conductors which they are recruiting like mad for at the moment . Besides the current mood seems to be that they have no cash for stuff like that .