Which I am sure has not been unnoticed by those in the SIS building at Vauxhall Cross.
What interest would our foreign intelligence service have in such domestic goings on?
Which I am sure has not been unnoticed by those in the SIS building at Vauxhall Cross.
Pictures of Jeremy Corbyn's office have appeared in newspapers and it's pretty obvious he's running a pre-mid 90s paper based office where he's surrounded by huge piles of paper, ring binders and filing cabinets.
Perhaps an Owen Smith led party with Corbyn in a role like Shadow Transport Minister would best suit all parties. Some of the pro-Corbyn unions would still get to work directly with Corbyn but the leader would be someone more likely to attract non-Labour voters to vote for them.
Given that many people are now equating Momentum with Militant, I wonder if all those in Momentum are the offspring of the Militant Tendency...after all, age would be correct, born in the 1980's....of course, it could be for a completely different reason, such as a group of like-minded people who are concerned with the rapid increase in inequality, or something like that!
Oh please. That's obviously nonsense. Let's try to retain a shred of realism here.
He'll use Polonium instead. Ice picks are sooo last century.![]()
And, for really top secret stuff, the Russians stopped sending electronic communications and reverted to typewriters a while back. Electronic communications are far easier to intercept, automatically analyse, and store for future reference. Also you have no means of knowing that it has been intercepted. Perhaps Jeremy is ahead of the curve?
How do you get written communications to other people - Fax? Post? Courier? Carry them between places in person? Those aren't 100% secure.
Cheshire East voted hand in glove with the country as a whole to leave the EU. The response of remainers has been a mixture of panic and despair, declaring in their grief "Heaven knows I'm miserable now".
Really Corbyn (or the next leader) is going to need to create an additional position in the shadow cabinet - someone to shadow David Davis' role.
Are Labour living in the real world ?
I wonder if Mr Corbyn is prepared to follow the democratic position of his party and support the introduction of Trident II.
That'll be news to the Royal Navy! They seem to be labouring under the impression that it's already in service![]()
Trident II? Should i have said Trident III?
We already operate Trident II and will continue to operate Trident II well into the 2040s.
Today's vote will see us confirm our commitment to the Trident II service life extension program (working with the US Navy) and to refurbishing and life extending our nuclear warheads. But both of those are a small fry to the main decision and expense which is replacing the submarines. They are going to be the new component in our nuclear weapons system otherwise it'll be the same system as we have now.
thanks - i thought the upgrade to the missile was essentially a new system. The submarines are the key of course!
For the avoidance of doubt i believe in renewing our commitment to this system. While the French have such weapons we must have them.I know this makes me a terrible Blaririst red Tory war mongering Zionist stooge who is ripe for drumming out of the party under the terms of the new, kinder, politics Mr Corbyn and his acolytes espouse but so be it.
I wonder if Mr Corbyn is prepared to follow the democratic position of his party and support the introduction of Trident II.
You know, that policy he and the rest of his MP were elected to parliament on. What with it being part of the manifesto and approved at conference you might think it was important. Or does democracy only apply to Corbynians when it suits their position?
Will he order his MP's to follow the democratic will of the party or simply try to overlook unpleasant issue such as this.
When you say democratic will of the Labour Party, do you mean the half a million members or a handful of pro-Trident Labour MPs?
When you say democratic will of the Labour Party, do you mean the half a million members or a handful of pro-Trident Labour MPs?
When I say democratic I mean as in our manifesto, a commitment we gave to the electorate and voted for at conference. Or does that not matter? Does only pro Corbyn democracy count?
And it isn't half a million members. It is some full members ( like me) and lots of £3 jonny come latelys.
When I say democratic I mean as in our manifesto, a commitment we gave to the electorate and voted for at conference. Or does that not matter? Does only pro Corbyn democracy count?
We already operate Trident II and will continue to operate Trident II well into the 2040s.
Today's vote will see us confirm our commitment to the Trident II service life extension program (working with the US Navy) and to refurbishing and life extending our nuclear warheads. But both of those are a small fry to the main decision and expense which is replacing the submarines. They are going to be the new component in our nuclear weapons system otherwise it'll be the same system as we have now.
Corbyn is letting the Labour representatives, MPs the people elected, make their own decision in the best interests of their constituents. How oppressive! What a terrible dictator he is! He's the next Pol Pot I tells ya!
Many people, when talking about Trident, seem to automatically assume that name refers to the actual submarines, rather than the actual missiles.
What is the correct term to use to describe the actual submarines?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Are these some of the same people who the freedom of the Referendum vote allowed a "Leave" vote. The RMT was most certainly in favour of a "Leave" vote in the referendum.
You say Corbyn is allowing Labour PM's to make their decision. I thought he just regarded them as naught but a figurehead, to bedisregarded when the mood took him.
I really must dust off my first edition of Animal Farm to see if I can draw any comparisons to recent Labour Party happenings....:roll:
Many people, when talking about Trident, seem to automatically assume that name refers to the actual submarines, rather than the actual missiles.
What is the correct term to use to describe the actual submarines?
They are currently known as 'Successor class' submarines but I'm confident that at some point in the near future they'll get a somewhat better name!
rather than a weapons system that if it ever gets used will probably result in the extermination of the human race.
Howabout "Thatcher Class"?
Something that brings death and destruction and ****es off the left wing.
And the current class is named Vanguard.
That's the point of Trident. It exists to make nuclear war a scenario that nobody can win, hence deterring anyone from launching such an attack in the first place.
Paul S must know all about inequality with his mansion in very affluent Cheshire. The subject of intense progressive taxation measures should Real Labour with real labour policies ever get into power. No wonder so many people were worried when Jeremy got elected by a popular vote rather than an isolated controlling elite. Just like the results of the referendum really. Give people a smell of power but dismiss their views when they are expressed in a way you are uncomfortable with.
MOTTO 2 : Never use a simple basic English phrase when a whole paragraph of convoluted arcane English terms can be substituted.
Do you know what submariners call flattops?Not sure a design has been ordered yet has it? Looks like a massive waste of money to me. Possibly could have spent it on better aircraft carriers and better aircraft to go on them rather than a wenapons system that if it ever gets used will probably result in the extermination of the human race.