Gareth Marston
Established Member
It also has to be remembered that a lot of Tory voters were commuters and/or lived in the Shires, so a Serpell like programme of closures wouldn't have been very astute politically, even in the early 1980's.
Its often said backbench Tory MP's knew of the plans to close their commuter lines before the Minister was briefed! So plenty of anecdotal evidence that someone or something played a very good pre-emptive political game. As one Tory MP said Serpell option A was electoral suicide.
Scargill would have given his right hand for an equivalent a Serpell Option A Map from the NCB which of course they never publicly leaked though of course it existed.
I suspect that the closure/mass restructuring medicine prescribed at the time was supported by the senior managers in the steel and coal industry etc but crucially not by BR's. Thatcher had the backing of the other industry's management so could tackle restructuring & the unions via them. The difference with Reshaping in the 60's was of course is had the backing of BR & its then Chairman Beeching. Parker wasn't going to close the railway. Also one of her early transport minsters "went native" Norman Fowler and supported the joint electrification programme proposals of 1981 much to the disgust of Ministry officials who were still hunting the profitable core.
By the time Serpell was shelved we then had the 83 election , then the 84/85 miners strike so by the time BR was possibly next going to be looked at in the mid 80's we had economic growth, BR had growing passenger numbers and BR came up with business focus and sectorisation reforms so effectively staved off any attention through a combination of factors