*Waits for the "he shouldn't have been there, it's his parents fault etc etc" type comments*
now that is a tragedy, the kid was 2 for ***** sake and no 2 year old deserves that, and he shouldn't have been there unless accompanied by an adult, but no matter what the circumstances a 2 year old being killed is a tragedy
*Waits for the "he shouldn't have been there, it's his parents fault etc etc" type comments*
Why would anyone say that? :?
This is obviously not comparable to a teenage trespasser death, a 2 year old clearly wouldn't know the dangers... :roll:
*Waits for the "he shouldn't have been there, it's his parents fault etc etc" type comments*
*Waits for the "he shouldn't have been there, it's his parents fault etc etc" type comments*
The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) - which has responsibility for health and safety on railways - said a sliding latch had been altered so the metal railing gate guarding the crossing could not be fixed shut.
A spokesman said inspectors were concerned that if the latch had to be released before the gate would open, anyone trapped on the crossing would find it harder to escape.
The spokesman said inspectors had advised Network Rail - which operates and maintains tracks and crossings - to remove the latch. Instead, Network Rail had left the latch in place but fixed it in an open position so pedestrians could simply push or pull the gate.
"Neighbour Margaret Cianna, 71, who lives yards from the crossing, said: “I heard a woman screaming. It was awful. Then it was followed by a big commotion.
“Dozens of people ran to the scene.
“It’s just too horrific to contemplate. About three weeks ago the gates were adapted so they could be pushed open, without removing a bolt.”
"I have been crossing the line twice a day for the past seven years and, until recently, I would have said it was safe. However, earlier this year someone added some bolts to the sliding catches, which means they no longer 'lock' shut. Shame on whoever came up with that idea."
Has anyone blamed the kid, said 'good' or blamed the parents? The parents it would seem have accepted it as a tragedy, and aren't blaming anyone else (at least not yet).
As has been mentioned - this is nothing like the cases where older kids up to no good are killed. So, there won't be any comments like those seen on other threads, which are totally unrelated. Sorry to disappoint!
That said, if NR had made changes to the gate then certain questions may be asked - as they do have a duty of care. I'd have said that it might be unfair to blame the railway if someone else had tampered with something, but if this was actually actioned by Network Rail then they will have to justify their actions.
But was there anything to suggest that the people before had been upto no good ?