• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

XC Voyager Refurbishment

Bornin1980s

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2017
Messages
720
It was a headphone jack and buttons allowing you to choose a number of pre-recorded radio stations or live BBC radio stations but was removed from use when the Voyagers and Pandolinos received WiFi instead. They don't work today and the Voyagers still have them in situ between the seats on unrefurbished stock.
I know about that, I meant the larger panel by the disabled bay.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,725
Location
Worcester
Thanks for the clarification.

I do wish there was a forum rule that meant head codes could only be posted if accompanied with the service detail.
I don't because most people don't have time for that, therefore people that might have put the headcode (easily typed into RTT) in the thread might not bother putting anything in at all.
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,376
Location
Lichfield
I don't because most people don't have time for that, therefore people that might have put the headcode (easily typed into RTT) in the thread might not bother putting anything in at all.

To me it's the same as using codes and jargon that not everyone understands.
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
3,268
Location
East Midlands
Thanks for the clarification.

I do wish there was a forum rule that meant head codes could only be posted if accompanied with the service detail.
Yes, it's not really any effort to cut & paste e.g. "1F55 1602 St Pancras International to Sheffield" from Realtime trains, so I always do that.
 

sabanda

Member
Joined
25 May 2025
Messages
130
Location
Bournemouth
Just hoping it makes a visit to the south coast tomorrow - I'm away for a fair while from Thursday so will be very late to the party otherwise!
 

43095john

Member
Joined
16 Jan 2009
Messages
102
Location
UK
Unit has been displaced due to the Fatality at Ambergate Jn so it's now working 1Z63 2023 Sheffield - Newcastle and will finish tonight in Tyne Yard
 

BillStampy

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2024
Messages
1,574
Location
Llanharan
Assuming it follows its diagram tomorrow it'll be coupled up to a Class 221 tomorrow up to Leeds from New Street.
 

43095john

Member
Joined
16 Jan 2009
Messages
102
Location
UK
Full Diagram for 25th Feb
5V82 0451 Tyne Yard - Newcastle
1V82 0518 Newcastle - Reading
1E36 1046 Reading - Newcastle
1V91 1634 Newcastle - Birmingham NS
1E67 2003 Birmingham NS - Leeds (Attached to 221128)
5E67 2225 Leeds - Crofton Depot
 

FGWHST43009

Member
Joined
3 Nov 2020
Messages
253
So is it a set being released every fortnight from now? Should hopefully increase the chance of getting either an ex-Avanti or a refurbished set in April
 

FlybeDash8Q400

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2018
Messages
3,006
Location
Edinburgh
So is it a set being released every fortnight from now? Should hopefully increase the chance of getting either an ex-Avanti or a refurbished set in April
It certainly looks that way. 2 being done at once. Each train taking 4 weeks, with a new set released every 2 weeks.

I know the previous target was by the end of 2027, but wasn’t it said at the press launch it might end up being 2 years? I’m guessing this is due to Litchurch Lane’s annual summer shutdown?
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,562
Location
Macclesfield
So is it a set being released every fortnight from now? Should hopefully increase the chance of getting either an ex-Avanti or a refurbished set in April
I would think that the ultimate intention is to see a set released every ten days/week and a half in order to get through seventy sets within a two year timeframe. First recipients of a refurb generally take a bit longer before the ball really gets rolling.
 

FrontSideBus

On Moderation
Joined
11 Feb 2025
Messages
451
How many services operating with engines out? I bet Cummins could offer a more powerful, reliable and fuel efficient model.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
2,282
How many services operating with engines out? I bet Cummins could offer a more powerful, reliable and fuel efficient model.
The engines and traction packages are pretty reliable in my opinion... I sign and drive Voyagers.

Any engine in any fleet is going to fail sometimes. But I've never had one catastrophically fail on me.

Perhaps the problem is getting the units back to Central Rivers to have them swapped out.
 

takno

Verified Rep - Traksy
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
6,574
How many services operating with engines out? I bet Cummins could offer a more powerful, reliable and fuel efficient model.
I thought the point with Voyagers was that they'd been deliberately tweaked to reduce the number of engines in use when the power wasn't required. There's plenty of 800s running about the place with a broken engines, but that's a different issue.
 

Bornin1980s

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2017
Messages
720
The engines and traction packages are pretty reliable in my opinion... I sign and drive Voyagers.

Any engine in any fleet is going to fail sometimes. But I've never had one catastrophically fail on me.

Perhaps the problem is getting the units back to Central Rivers to have them swapped out.
What is a catastrophic failure?
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,609
Location
Hampshire
How many services operating with engines out? I bet Cummins could offer a more powerful, reliable and fuel efficient model.
I don’t know how many Voyagers you travel on or regularly see but it seems fairly rare to see one running with an engine out. Unlike the IETs…

However I do slightly agree on the fuel efficiency point as the QSK19 has always been a thirsty engine.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
2,282
What is a catastrophic failure?
This sort of failure:
Major failure e.g connecting rod bearing failure snapped timing belt of chain and engine seizing from lack of lubrication
In short: I've never had a Voyager fail on me to an extent it needed rescue, couldn't make it back to a depot, etc. I think I have shut an engine down once as it sounded rough - but it hadn't caught fire or self destructed or anything.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

However I do slightly agree on the fuel efficiency point as the QSK19 has always been a thirsty engine.
The general rule of thumb when planning seems to be 0.5MPG / 2 gallons a mile for a 5-car.
 

Top