LittleRedTrain
Member
Is that because when it comes to getting a seat on a Voyager.. Good Luck, Babe!I’ve heard the livery referred to as “Chapel Roan” before - I presume they are designers?
Is that because when it comes to getting a seat on a Voyager.. Good Luck, Babe!I’ve heard the livery referred to as “Chapel Roan” before - I presume they are designers?
I’ve heard the livery referred to as “Chapel Roan” before - I presume they are designers?
Out on a test run today - photos credit to Adam Leary on the Facebook group
Video of it at Sheffield here (not my video):Out on a test run today - photos credit to Adam Leary on the Facebook group
And when they overheat and fail… they’re hot to not go!Is that because when it comes to getting a seat on a Voyager.. Good Luck, Babe!![]()
The panel also appears to contain some sort of disabled alarm call system. I guess any modifications to that panel would have involved more paperwork.That’s quite a useful walkthrough. Provides a slightly better feel of the insides than the static pictures.
Very amusingly, though, it looks like they haven’t quite got rid of all the redundant at-seat entertainment points! At 6:17 in the video, at the bottom left of the picture, isn’t that still one of the entertainment units in situ? Presumably the one which would have served the wheelchair space in that area?
It's worse than that. The 321s are slightly wider than the Voyagers, and don't have a tilt profile. 3+2 in a Voyager body would be an absolute nightmare!I’d have travelled in the bag if that were the case and their 3+2 seating idea had been implemented, it would probably have been more comfortable!
Just imagine if that 3+2 has gone ahead, we’d be paying the same astronomical prices we are today but with a far more uncomfortable journey. To get your 2+2 we all use today would have cost even more. Ouch
I’ve travelled on a 3+2 class 321 from King’s Cross to Wakefield and it’s an experience I wouldn’t want to repeat!
That’s quite a useful walkthrough. Provides a slightly better feel of the insides than the static pictures.
She is the singer of "Pink Pony Club", so presumably a reference to the colour choice of the livery...I can only presume whoever said that was referring to pop singer Chappell Roan, who and I quote Wikipedia has a "camp and drag-queen influenced style". Make of that what you will![]()
The inbound service lost quite a bit of time at Derby where the allocation shows the attachment, so it might be true.Presume this allocation is incorrect?
Realtime Trains | 1S51 1227 Plymouth to Glasgow Central | 20/02/2026
Real-time train running information for 1S51 1227 departure from Plymouth to Glasgow Central on 20/02/2026. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
I can confirm that Trust is showing the same. Presumably the southbound working towards Plymouth will have been the very first passenger service for a Cross Country refurbished 220/221.Presume this allocation is incorrect?
Realtime Trains | 1S51 1227 Plymouth to Glasgow Central | 20/02/2026
Real-time train running information for 1S51 1227 departure from Plymouth to Glasgow Central on 20/02/2026. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
How strange. Trust was showing 033 as being with 012 before.Will have to try and find it next week on one of my usual Bournemouth runs!
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
RTT is now showing 1S51 as 012 and 013
That makes a lot of sense. Maybe the designer was a fan.She is the singer of "Pink Pony Club", so presumably a reference to the colour choice of the livery...
Will have to try and find it next week on one of my usual Bournemouth runs!
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
RTT is now showing 1S51 as 012 and 013
The answer is no, the couplers are completely different.Seeing lots of pics of the refurbished 170s and 220s/221s. Quick question, not sure if it belongs here?
Can a 170 work in multiple with a Voyager, or are the couplers not compatible?
Just wondered if they could work together. I've a feeling the answer will be no!!?
No, apart from all the other issues they have a totally different coupler.Seeing lots of pics of the refurbished 170s and 220s/221s. Quick question, not sure if it belongs here?
Can a 170 work in multiple with a Voyager, or are the couplers not compatible?
Just wondered if they could work together. I've a feeling the answer will be no!!?
I guessed as much. Thank you.No, apart from all the other issues they have a totally different coupler.
The panel also appears to contain some sort of disabled alarm call system. I guess any modifications to that panel would have involved more paperwork.
To be honest, I was only guessing it's actual function. What is it?Interestingly, I was on an ex-Avanti XC unit earlier today and took the opportunity to look at the panel in question in the equivalent coach. Seems like the Avanti refurb did leave the outline “shell” of the at-seat entertainment unit in that zone, but blanked off its buttons. So also still there, but at least not with redundant buttons like on the XC-refurbed unit!
It was a headphone jack and buttons allowing you to choose a number of pre-recorded radio stations or live BBC radio stations but was removed from use when the Voyagers and Pandolinos received WiFi instead. They don't work today and the Voyagers still have them in situ between the seats on unrefurbished stock.To be honest, I was only guessing it's actual function. What is it?
Just noticed a very tiny detail, has the bulb in the main headlight been swapped for an LED one?, it looks whiter.
That’s the marker light, the headlight bulb still looks like a halogen if you blow the picture up.Just noticed a very tiny detail, has the bulb in the main headlight been swapped for an LED one?, it looks whiter.
Actually no it doesn't look like it. strange the mirrors haven't been given a clean though.
View attachment 198797