• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

XC Voyager Refurbishment

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

GoneSouth

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2018
Messages
1,474
Refurb underway though.
They really need cleaning, mould removing from the windows, the lighting needs sorting out (note they have replaced a fair few vestibule lights recently but the luggage space is dingy), the carpets and upholstery needs replacing and a good bright paint job is required. Oh, WIFI is a bit pants too!

Oh, and they could be shaving 20-30% off their fares please.8-)

Apart from that they are impressive machines with a quality smooth ride.
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,422
Location
Lichfield
They really need cleaning, mould removing from the windows, the lighting needs sorting out (note they have replaced a fair few vestibule lights recently but the luggage space is dingy), the carpets and upholstery needs replacing and a good bright paint job is required. Oh, WIFI is a bit pants too!

Oh, and they could be shaving 20-30% off their fares please.8-)

Apart from that they are impressive machines with a quality smooth ride.

Not sure a fare reduction comes under the remit of the refurb scheme, but it would be nice if it was! :D

On that note, it's a shame they can't cut the carriages in half and slot in an extra couple of meters like they do with ships!
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
2,606
Location
South Staffordshire
Not sure a fare reduction comes under the remit of the refurb scheme, but it would be nice if it was! :D

On that note, it's a shame they can't cut the carriages in half and slot in an extra couple of meters like they do with ships!
The bodyshells are 23m length which was introduced to BR in the 1970s with the Mk3s and the class 155, 156 and 158. The issue with the 220 and 221 was designed into them by the Virgin group - great big toilets and vestibules with dull, dingy saloons, and that 700hp Cummins vibration under floor.

They are 25 years on a 27 or 28 year old design and despite having an Agate AC traction system they are still diesel only.
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,422
Location
Lichfield
The bodyshells are 23m length which was introduced to BR in the 1970s with the Mk3s and the class 155, 156 and 158. The issue with the 220 and 221 was designed into them by the Virgin group - great big toilets and vestibules with dull, dingy saloons, and that 700hp Cummins vibration under floor.

They are 25 years on a 27 or 28 year old design and despite having an Agate AC traction system they are still diesel only.

My suggestion about cutting them in half, wasn't a serious one.
 

GoneSouth

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2018
Messages
1,474
I quite like listening to the big throbbing Cummins tbh
I like it from the outside, it always tells me which platform my Voyager is on even if I can’t see it because I’m in subway or on a high sided bridge.

Cutting them in half is not acceptable to me. It needs to be a proper shredding into tiny pieces :lol:
And then replace them with inferior comfort, terrible ride quality and the ambiance of an interrogation room.
 

FrontSideBus

On Moderation
Joined
11 Feb 2025
Messages
451
If we supposedly have a privatised railway... how come the DFT has so much control over even the interior trimmings???
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,622
Location
Hampshire
If we supposedly have a privatised railway... how come the DFT has so much control over even the interior trimmings???
Fingers and pies… it’s never really been as privatised as people seem to think.

Of course both the IET and Thameslink 700s show what we can expect from a train designed and costed by Civil Servants. How far has GTR come with its retrofit program for the Desiro City’s…
 

GoneSouth

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2018
Messages
1,474
Of course both the IET and Thameslink 700s show what we can expect from a train designed and costed by Civil Servants.
Yes, it’s almost like they’re copying the bare minimum specs of Ryanair but forgetting to reduce the Emirates level fares to reflect this
 

Martin_1981

Member
Joined
15 Jul 2011
Messages
274
It's deserved, to be fair, yes internally they are a mess, but reliability wise they are solid.
The best 2 qualities of the Voyagers has to be the fact that they are solid as a rock reliability wise as you say and, the acceleration for a diesel train is second to none. Apart from that, not much else.
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
2,606
Location
South Staffordshire
Yes, it’s almost like they’re copying the bare minimum specs of Ryanair but forgetting to reduce the Emirates level fares to reflect this
I like that analogy :lol:
The truth is the railway industry is micromanaged more than ever befor by suits in the DfT. Nothing has been learnt about the shambles of British Railways modernisation, and a very clear example is the CAF DMUs. They authorised the acquisition of a fleet of DMUs which are basically the same, but have different designations, requiring different crew competencies, and they cannot couple to each other. At least back in the day you could couple any blue square DMU set to any other.

Lets not mention the appalling situation in GWR at the moment with around a hundred IET generator units isolated which resulted in the 2003 Paddington - Plymouth running out of fuel a mile from destination, and passengers stepping off the train at quarter past three the next morning. The IEP was cosily developed by a senior DfT civil servant with Hitachi. Cracking aluminium brackets, dodgy MTU fuel pumps shabby vinyls and seat fabrics are just some of the woes I believe.
 

Freemo

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
94
Location
Sheffield
I do find it funny when people refer to the Voyager saloons as dingy whilst other threads have complaints about the 'dentist's chair' lighting on e.g. IETs and the new/refurbed Northern units. I prefer the dinge.

I am able to time my commute so I only get doubled-up Voyagers on quieter days of the week for less than 50 minutes and from that perspective they're alright. Admittedly that is a small fraction of the overall experience on them.
 

The_Train

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2018
Messages
5,247
I do find it funny when people refer to the Voyager saloons as dingy whilst other threads have complaints about the 'dentist's chair' lighting on e.g. IETs and the new/refurbed Northern units. I prefer the dinge.
They have saloons? I thought they were just made up of vestibule areas :D
 

flyer

Member
Joined
4 Nov 2024
Messages
18
Location
leeds
Personally don’t mind the 22x trains, it’s the grubby, scruffy XC interiors that are awful, the difference between these and the EMR Meridian’s is massive imo
 

voyagerdude220

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2005
Messages
4,263
Personally don’t mind the 22x trains, it’s the grubby, scruffy XC interiors that are awful, the difference between these and the EMR Meridian’s is massive imo
Agreed, there's also a big difference between the interiors of the XC 220/221s and the ex Avanti 221s.

My Wife often said she couldn't believe how tatty and worn out the XC Voyager was in comparison to the Avanti one when we changed trains from an Avanti 221 to a XC 220/221.
 

Top