dk1
Veteran Member
Refurb underway though.It's deserved, to be fair, yes internally they are a mess, but reliability wise they are solid.
Refurb underway though.It's deserved, to be fair, yes internally they are a mess, but reliability wise they are solid.
Refurb underway though.
They really need cleaning, mould removing from the windows, the lighting needs sorting out (note they have replaced a fair few vestibule lights recently but the luggage space is dingy), the carpets and upholstery needs replacing and a good bright paint job is required. Oh, WIFI is a bit pants too!Refurb underway though.
They really need cleaning, mould removing from the windows, the lighting needs sorting out (note they have replaced a fair few vestibule lights recently but the luggage space is dingy), the carpets and upholstery needs replacing and a good bright paint job is required. Oh, WIFI is a bit pants too!
Oh, and they could be shaving 20-30% off their fares please.
Apart from that they are impressive machines with a quality smooth ride.
Not sure a fare reduction comes under the remit of the refurb scheme, but it would be nice if it was
They are taking their timeRefurb underway though.
Im sure somebody said further issues were found causing delay with the first Voyager undergoing refurbishment hence why we are still waiting.They are taking their time
The bodyshells are 23m length which was introduced to BR in the 1970s with the Mk3s and the class 155, 156 and 158. The issue with the 220 and 221 was designed into them by the Virgin group - great big toilets and vestibules with dull, dingy saloons, and that 700hp Cummins vibration under floor.Not sure a fare reduction comes under the remit of the refurb scheme, but it would be nice if it was!
On that note, it's a shame they can't cut the carriages in half and slot in an extra couple of meters like they do with ships!
The bodyshells are 23m length which was introduced to BR in the 1970s with the Mk3s and the class 155, 156 and 158. The issue with the 220 and 221 was designed into them by the Virgin group - great big toilets and vestibules with dull, dingy saloons, and that 700hp Cummins vibration under floor.
They are 25 years on a 27 or 28 year old design and despite having an Agate AC traction system they are still diesel only.
Haha Could have fooled me. Actually you did !!!!My suggestion about cutting them in half, wasn't a serious one.
Cutting them in half is not acceptable to me. It needs to be a proper shredding into tiny piecesMy suggestion about cutting them in half, wasn't a serious one.
I like it from the outside, it always tells me which platform my Voyager is on even if I can’t see it because I’m in subway or on a high sided bridge.I quite like listening to the big throbbing Cummins tbh
And then replace them with inferior comfort, terrible ride quality and the ambiance of an interrogation room.Cutting them in half is not acceptable to me. It needs to be a proper shredding into tiny pieces![]()
Cutting them in half is not acceptable to me. It needs to be a proper shredding into tiny pieces![]()
Fingers and pies… it’s never really been as privatised as people seem to think.If we supposedly have a privatised railway... how come the DFT has so much control over even the interior trimmings???
Short answer: we don’t have a privatised railway.If we supposedly have a privatised railway... how come the DFT has so much control over even the interior trimmings???
Yes, it’s almost like they’re copying the bare minimum specs of Ryanair but forgetting to reduce the Emirates level fares to reflect thisOf course both the IET and Thameslink 700s show what we can expect from a train designed and costed by Civil Servants.
He who pays the piper....If we supposedly have a privatised railway... how come the DFT has so much control over even the interior trimmings???
But we do have one that’s very easy to blame the after effects upon privatisation whilst watching the DfT scurry away.Short answer: we don’t have a privatised railway.
The best 2 qualities of the Voyagers has to be the fact that they are solid as a rock reliability wise as you say and, the acceleration for a diesel train is second to none. Apart from that, not much else.It's deserved, to be fair, yes internally they are a mess, but reliability wise they are solid.
I like that analogyYes, it’s almost like they’re copying the bare minimum specs of Ryanair but forgetting to reduce the Emirates level fares to reflect this
Sums up the state of the UK railways nicely - keep one vile train because their replacements will be even worseYeah, great, then they could be replaced by DFT poverty spec IET's...
Sums up the state of the UK railways nicely - keep one vile train because their replacements will be even worse![]()
No trolley on the x Avanti sets.Was on ex Avanti 221 today and much nicer than the native XC voyagers. The shop was being used, I didn't see if it was a static trolley though?
Some people like marmite as well. Don't worry about it, you'll be fineI don't find Voyagers vile.
They have saloons? I thought they were just made up of vestibule areasI do find it funny when people refer to the Voyager saloons as dingy whilst other threads have complaints about the 'dentist's chair' lighting on e.g. IETs and the new/refurbed Northern units. I prefer the dinge.
Agreed, there's also a big difference between the interiors of the XC 220/221s and the ex Avanti 221s.Personally don’t mind the 22x trains, it’s the grubby, scruffy XC interiors that are awful, the difference between these and the EMR Meridian’s is massive imo