• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Wrong Ticket Penalty Fare

Status
Not open for further replies.

Flangle045

Member
Joined
22 Jul 2025
Messages
7
Location
Leeds
I was accosted by the ticket collector on the northern rail train from Pudsey to Leeds. The collector asked for my ticket but I accidentally bought a ticket for the wrong day (next day). The woman gave me an opportunity to buy a ticket on the app but it wouldn't work because I didn't have signal, so she decided instead to just fine me £50, which seems a bit unfair for a £4 ticket. I showed her my extensive daily history of buying tickets to prove it was just an honest mistake, but the ticket collector stonewalled my shaking, tearful defence, telling me I will just have to pay the fine... (100£ total but 50£ if paid before 21 days).

I used my right to appeal, submitted this on Penalty Services (Penalty issued by Northern). It goes:
Dear Northern Rail Customer Services,

" I am writing to appeal a penalty fare that I received on (DATE) while travelling from Pudsey to Leeds.

Unfortunately, I accidentally purchased a ticket for the wrong date on the Northern app — an honest mistake that I only realised when the ticket collector asked to see my ticket. I immediately attempted to purchase the correct ticket on the app but was unable to do so due to lack of mobile signal on the train. Despite explaining the situation and showing my extensive history of ticket purchases for this same route as evidence of my regular travel and intent to pay, the penalty fare was issued.
I fully understand the importance of travelling with a valid ticket, and I had every intention to do so — the error was entirely unintentional, and I attempted to resolve it there and then. I respectfully believe that being fined £50 for a genuine mistake on a £4 journey, when I was actively trying to purchase the correct ticket and have a consistent history of buying tickets properly, is disproportionate and unfair.



Please find attached:


  • A screenshot of the incorrectly dated ticket.
  • Screenshots of recent Northern tickets showing my usual travel pattern.
  • Any additional evidence you may require.
I would appreciate it if this penalty could be reviewed, taking into account my willingness to pay, my previous good record, and the mitigating circumstances.
Thank you for your time and understanding. I look forward to your response.
Kind regards, "


They replied this (also attached):
"Dear Ms X, To ensure fairness and consistency in the decision-making process, appeals are considered in conjunction with a code of practice. The statements submitted on behalf of the passenger and the train company will both be taken into account by an experienced assessor to determine the appeal outcome. More information about how appeals are decided is available on our homepage at www.penaltyservices.co.uk.

Many rail users consider penalty fares to be an accusation of fare avoidance but this is not the case at all. A Penalty Fare is simply a higher fare which may be issued under The Penalty Fares Rules and Regulations by a member of staff who is licensed to act on behalf of a train operating company which issues penalty fares. Penalty fare warning posters are on display at every penalty fares station (as required under Regulation 8) advising customers of the consequences for boarding a penalty fares train without a valid ticket or other authority to travel in their possession.

The National Rail Conditions of Travel (NRCoT) advise that where the facility to buy a ticket exists prior to boarding, passengers should pay the correct fare for their entire journey before they travel and produce for inspection a valid ticket as evidence of their right to make a journey on the relevant train, otherwise they may be liable to pay a Penalty Fare Notice.

I understand it was thought the ticket produced for inspection was valid for the journey made, however, that isn’t the case I’m afraid.

It remains the passenger’s responsibility to confirm that their ticket is valid for their entire journey they intend making before boarding the train. This also involves checking the date of travel, that the proposed route between the stations recorded on the ticket is valid, and any other restrictions which may apply to the use of that ticket on the rail network.

As the ticket produced for inspection was not valid for the entire journey recorded on the penalty fare and the facility to check the validity of the ticket existed at the time of travel, regrettably it has been concluded by Penalty Services that the penalty fare should stand. It remains the passenger's responsibility to confirm that they have a ticket and that their ticket is valid for the entire journey they intend to make before boarding the train. This also involves checking the date of travel, that the proposed route between stations recorded on the ticket is valid, and any other restrictions which may apply to the use of that ticket on the rail network.

When a Penalty Fare Notice is issued, the amount of the penalty fare is £100.00 plus the price of the full single fare applicable. If paid before the end of the period of 21 days beginning with the day following the day on which the penalty fare is charged, the amount is £50.00 plus the price of the full single fare applicable. The full single fare applicable takes into account the age of the person in question, the day and time of the journey that person is making has made or intends to make and the train and route that person is using, has used or intends to use. Although your comments about the amount of the Penalty Fare have been noted, the amount of a Penalty Fare is set by the government, not by the rail operator.

Rest assured that Penalty Services is neither judge nor jury and we are not deciding anyone's innocence or guilt when judging appeals so your honesty is not under any scrutiny whatsoever. Similarly, because there is no onus on the train company to prove there was any intention to avoid payment of the correct fare before issuing a penalty fare, the discretion guidelines are not based on intent. Therefore, a passenger's willingness to buy a ticket after their journey had already begun would only have a bearing on their liability to pay a penalty fare if the facility to buy/extend a ticket did not exist at the origin/interchange station.

Train operating companies are not obliged to provide an app; they are obliged to ensure that it is possible to purchase a ticket prior to travel at the station. On this occasion, that facility did exist. In most instances when passengers have difficulty with the app, it is related to the fact that the apps are designed not to sell tickets for trains that are imminently departing (to avoid passengers missing trains). Whilst I don’t know if that was the issue on this occasion, it is something to bear in mind. Also, the National Rail Conditions of Travel (NRCoT) advise that where the facility to buy a ticket exists prior to boarding, passengers should pay the correct fare for their entire journey before they travel and produce for inspection a valid ticket as evidence of their right to make a journey on the relevant train, otherwise they may be liable to pay a Penalty Fare Notice. Tickets purchased after boarding are not valid and cannot be considered.

Whether a rail user is sold a ticket on board the train can depend upon many things, such as where they boarded, whether the train company issues penalty fares at all, and the role of the member of staff. Some conductors or guards are not authorised to issue penalty fares and they may check and sell tickets in transit; however, revenue inspectors are licensed to penalise passengers found to be present on the train without a valid ticket. These members of staff are only obliged to sell tickets in the circumstances set out in the discretion guidelines used by the train operator.

The conductor or guard should only be used as the first viable retail option where the facility to obtain a ticket or other authority to travel did not exist at the origin station, or where the facilities provided were not working properly, or where the queueing standards were breached by the train company.

Please note that Penalty Services is an independent appeals assessment body and carries out no other roles in the penalty fare process. When assessing an appeal, our primary concern is to understand if the penalty fare was issued in accordance with the rules and regulations in place. Penalty Services are bound to assess appeals using the code of practice which does not allow for removal or reduction of a PFN purely due to compassionate / financial reasons given by the appellant nor as a goodwill gesture for a first offence.

Having taken into consideration all the points raised to date, we regret to advise that your appeal has been unsuccessful. It is your right to re-appeal this decision. Any further appeal will be considered by a different appeal assessor. If re-appealing, please give the reason(s) why you are appealing against this decision and also mention any additional circumstances you would like taken into account. A further appeal should be submitted by post to: Penalty Services, 12 Deben Mill Business Centre, Old Maltings Approach, Woodbridge, IP12 1BL. or through our website at www.penaltyservices.co.uk/make-an-appeal/ within 14 days of the date this letter was received.

If you choose not to re-appeal and have not already paid your Penalty Fare Notice, you should pay any outstanding debt. Failure to pay can mean that the time allowed to pay the reduced amount for the Penalty Fare can run out making the amount of the Penalty Fare £100 plus the price of the full single fare applicable and further delays in payment may result in administration fees being added by the train company or its debt recovery agency.

Please also be aware that if you do not re-appeal this decision or pay the penalty fare within 14 days of the date this letter was received, the train operating company will be entitled to commence court proceedings to recover the penalty fare. Where this reply came by post to your address, the date received is assumed to be the second working day after the letter/post date as defined in paragraph 3 of schedule 2 of The Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 2018 as amended from time to time. Where you have been informed by email reply, the date received is the letter date.


"

I hear that apparently they barely even look at the first 2 appeals and I should re-submit until the 3rd appeal... Is there anything I can add so that my appeal is considered and won?

Thanks for the help.
 

Attachments

  • Appeal Outcome-NTL.pdf
    481.6 KB · Views: 10
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,343
Location
LBK
You can't successfully appeal the Penalty Fare in the circumstances you state with the information we have. As per the Regulations (that is, the law) governing Penalty Fares:

(3) The grounds on which an appeal under this regulation may be made are that—

(a)the penalty fare was not charged in accordance with the requirements of these Regulations;

(b)the appellant is not the person liable for the payment of the penalty fare;

(c)the appellant owns a season ticket valid for the journey in question but was not in possession of the season ticket at the time the penalty fare was charged; or

(d)there are compelling reasons why, in the particular circumstances of the case, the appellant should not be liable to pay the penalty fare.

None of these apply unless you can show the Penalty Fare was not issued in accordance with the Regulations. Therefore, it will help for you to show us a copy of the notice with your details removed, and we can see if the way it was filled out makes it technically invalid. But, otherwise - you have no grounds for appeal; "well this is harsh" won't get you anywhere.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
17,200
@Flangle045. Welcome to the forum. Unfortunately you didn't have a valid ticket for the day you travelled. Assume you actually travelled from New Pudsey to Leeds, and the unpaid fare you've been asked to pay is £4.30 (rather than £4) albeit with the £100/£50 penalty in addition. Would suggest this something you could have avoided with a little care and best chalked up to experience.
 

WesternLancer

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
15,077
I was accosted by the ticket collector on the northern rail train from Pudsey to Leeds. The collector asked for my ticket but I accidentally bought a ticket for the wrong day (next day). The woman gave me an opportunity to buy a ticket on the app but it wouldn't work because I didn't have signal, so she decided instead to just fine me £50, which seems a bit unfair for a £4 ticket. I showed her my extensive daily history of buying tickets to prove it was just an honest mistake, but the ticket collector stonewalled my shaking, tearful defence, telling me I will just have to pay the fine... (100£ total but 50£ if paid before 21 days).

I used my right to appeal, submitted this on Penalty Services (Penalty issued by Northern). It goes:
Dear Northern Rail Customer Services,

" I am writing to appeal a penalty fare that I received on (DATE) while travelling from Pudsey to Leeds.

Unfortunately, I accidentally purchased a ticket for the wrong date on the Northern app — an honest mistake that I only realised when the ticket collector asked to see my ticket. I immediately attempted to purchase the correct ticket on the app but was unable to do so due to lack of mobile signal on the train. Despite explaining the situation and showing my extensive history of ticket purchases for this same route as evidence of my regular travel and intent to pay, the penalty fare was issued.
I fully understand the importance of travelling with a valid ticket, and I had every intention to do so — the error was entirely unintentional, and I attempted to resolve it there and then. I respectfully believe that being fined £50 for a genuine mistake on a £4 journey, when I was actively trying to purchase the correct ticket and have a consistent history of buying tickets properly, is disproportionate and unfair.



Please find attached:


  • A screenshot of the incorrectly dated ticket.
  • Screenshots of recent Northern tickets showing my usual travel pattern.
  • Any additional evidence you may require.
I would appreciate it if this penalty could be reviewed, taking into account my willingness to pay, my previous good record, and the mitigating circumstances.
Thank you for your time and understanding. I look forward to your response.
Kind regards, "


They replied this (also attached):
"Dear Ms X, To ensure fairness and consistency in the decision-making process, appeals are considered in conjunction with a code of practice. The statements submitted on behalf of the passenger and the train company will both be taken into account by an experienced assessor to determine the appeal outcome. More information about how appeals are decided is available on our homepage at www.penaltyservices.co.uk.

Many rail users consider penalty fares to be an accusation of fare avoidance but this is not the case at all. A Penalty Fare is simply a higher fare which may be issued under The Penalty Fares Rules and Regulations by a member of staff who is licensed to act on behalf of a train operating company which issues penalty fares. Penalty fare warning posters are on display at every penalty fares station (as required under Regulation 8) advising customers of the consequences for boarding a penalty fares train without a valid ticket or other authority to travel in their possession.

The National Rail Conditions of Travel (NRCoT) advise that where the facility to buy a ticket exists prior to boarding, passengers should pay the correct fare for their entire journey before they travel and produce for inspection a valid ticket as evidence of their right to make a journey on the relevant train, otherwise they may be liable to pay a Penalty Fare Notice.

I understand it was thought the ticket produced for inspection was valid for the journey made, however, that isn’t the case I’m afraid.

It remains the passenger’s responsibility to confirm that their ticket is valid for their entire journey they intend making before boarding the train. This also involves checking the date of travel, that the proposed route between the stations recorded on the ticket is valid, and any other restrictions which may apply to the use of that ticket on the rail network.

As the ticket produced for inspection was not valid for the entire journey recorded on the penalty fare and the facility to check the validity of the ticket existed at the time of travel, regrettably it has been concluded by Penalty Services that the penalty fare should stand. It remains the passenger's responsibility to confirm that they have a ticket and that their ticket is valid for the entire journey they intend to make before boarding the train. This also involves checking the date of travel, that the proposed route between stations recorded on the ticket is valid, and any other restrictions which may apply to the use of that ticket on the rail network.

When a Penalty Fare Notice is issued, the amount of the penalty fare is £100.00 plus the price of the full single fare applicable. If paid before the end of the period of 21 days beginning with the day following the day on which the penalty fare is charged, the amount is £50.00 plus the price of the full single fare applicable. The full single fare applicable takes into account the age of the person in question, the day and time of the journey that person is making has made or intends to make and the train and route that person is using, has used or intends to use. Although your comments about the amount of the Penalty Fare have been noted, the amount of a Penalty Fare is set by the government, not by the rail operator.

Rest assured that Penalty Services is neither judge nor jury and we are not deciding anyone's innocence or guilt when judging appeals so your honesty is not under any scrutiny whatsoever. Similarly, because there is no onus on the train company to prove there was any intention to avoid payment of the correct fare before issuing a penalty fare, the discretion guidelines are not based on intent. Therefore, a passenger's willingness to buy a ticket after their journey had already begun would only have a bearing on their liability to pay a penalty fare if the facility to buy/extend a ticket did not exist at the origin/interchange station.

Train operating companies are not obliged to provide an app; they are obliged to ensure that it is possible to purchase a ticket prior to travel at the station. On this occasion, that facility did exist. In most instances when passengers have difficulty with the app, it is related to the fact that the apps are designed not to sell tickets for trains that are imminently departing (to avoid passengers missing trains). Whilst I don’t know if that was the issue on this occasion, it is something to bear in mind. Also, the National Rail Conditions of Travel (NRCoT) advise that where the facility to buy a ticket exists prior to boarding, passengers should pay the correct fare for their entire journey before they travel and produce for inspection a valid ticket as evidence of their right to make a journey on the relevant train, otherwise they may be liable to pay a Penalty Fare Notice. Tickets purchased after boarding are not valid and cannot be considered.

Whether a rail user is sold a ticket on board the train can depend upon many things, such as where they boarded, whether the train company issues penalty fares at all, and the role of the member of staff. Some conductors or guards are not authorised to issue penalty fares and they may check and sell tickets in transit; however, revenue inspectors are licensed to penalise passengers found to be present on the train without a valid ticket. These members of staff are only obliged to sell tickets in the circumstances set out in the discretion guidelines used by the train operator.

The conductor or guard should only be used as the first viable retail option where the facility to obtain a ticket or other authority to travel did not exist at the origin station, or where the facilities provided were not working properly, or where the queueing standards were breached by the train company.

Please note that Penalty Services is an independent appeals assessment body and carries out no other roles in the penalty fare process. When assessing an appeal, our primary concern is to understand if the penalty fare was issued in accordance with the rules and regulations in place. Penalty Services are bound to assess appeals using the code of practice which does not allow for removal or reduction of a PFN purely due to compassionate / financial reasons given by the appellant nor as a goodwill gesture for a first offence.

Having taken into consideration all the points raised to date, we regret to advise that your appeal has been unsuccessful. It is your right to re-appeal this decision. Any further appeal will be considered by a different appeal assessor. If re-appealing, please give the reason(s) why you are appealing against this decision and also mention any additional circumstances you would like taken into account. A further appeal should be submitted by post to: Penalty Services, 12 Deben Mill Business Centre, Old Maltings Approach, Woodbridge, IP12 1BL. or through our website at www.penaltyservices.co.uk/make-an-appeal/ within 14 days of the date this letter was received.

If you choose not to re-appeal and have not already paid your Penalty Fare Notice, you should pay any outstanding debt. Failure to pay can mean that the time allowed to pay the reduced amount for the Penalty Fare can run out making the amount of the Penalty Fare £100 plus the price of the full single fare applicable and further delays in payment may result in administration fees being added by the train company or its debt recovery agency.

Please also be aware that if you do not re-appeal this decision or pay the penalty fare within 14 days of the date this letter was received, the train operating company will be entitled to commence court proceedings to recover the penalty fare. Where this reply came by post to your address, the date received is assumed to be the second working day after the letter/post date as defined in paragraph 3 of schedule 2 of The Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 2018 as amended from time to time. Where you have been informed by email reply, the date received is the letter date.


"

I hear that apparently they barely even look at the first 2 appeals and I should re-submit until the 3rd appeal... Is there anything I can add so that my appeal is considered and won?

Thanks for the help.
I'm afraid the way you have to look at this is that Appeals on this are not decided on whether the penalty fare (pF) was issued 'unfairly' - eg you made an honest mistake and thus should not get a Penalty for it - it's based on whether you did or did not have a valid ticket. As I understand it that is the basis of the way the regulations (based on the laws that govern Penalty fares) are set out.

It's important not to miss the prompt payment discount on the Penalty - but this would be refunded if a further appeal based on things @AlterEgo is suggesting was successful.
 

Flangle045

Member
Joined
22 Jul 2025
Messages
7
Location
Leeds
I was accosted by the ticket collector on the northern rail train from Pudsey to Leeds. The collector asked for my ticket but I accidentally bought a ticket for the wrong day (next day). The woman gave me an opportunity to buy a ticket on the app but it wouldn't work because I didn't have signal, so she decided instead to just fine me £50, which seems a bit unfair for a £4 ticket. I showed her my extensive daily history of buying tickets to prove it was just an honest mistake, but the ticket collector stonewalled my shaking, tearful defence, telling me I will just have to pay the fine... (100£ total but 50£ if paid before 21 days).

I used my right to appeal, submitted this on Penalty Services (Penalty issued by Northern). It goes:
Dear Northern Rail Customer Services,

" I am writing to appeal a penalty fare that I received on (DATE) while travelling from Pudsey to Leeds.

Unfortunately, I accidentally purchased a ticket for the wrong date on the Northern app — an honest mistake that I only realised when the ticket collector asked to see my ticket. I immediately attempted to purchase the correct ticket on the app but was unable to do so due to lack of mobile signal on the train. Despite explaining the situation and showing my extensive history of ticket purchases for this same route as evidence of my regular travel and intent to pay, the penalty fare was issued.
I fully understand the importance of travelling with a valid ticket, and I had every intention to do so — the error was entirely unintentional, and I attempted to resolve it there and then. I respectfully believe that being fined £50 for a genuine mistake on a £4 journey, when I was actively trying to purchase the correct ticket and have a consistent history of buying tickets properly, is disproportionate and unfair.



Please find attached:


  • A screenshot of the incorrectly dated ticket.
  • Screenshots of recent Northern tickets showing my usual travel pattern.
  • Any additional evidence you may require.
I would appreciate it if this penalty could be reviewed, taking into account my willingness to pay, my previous good record, and the mitigating circumstances.
Thank you for your time and understanding. I look forward to your response.
Kind regards, "


They replied this (also attached):
"Dear Ms X, To ensure fairness and consistency in the decision-making process, appeals are considered in conjunction with a code of practice. The statements submitted on behalf of the passenger and the train company will both be taken into account by an experienced assessor to determine the appeal outcome. More information about how appeals are decided is available on our homepage at www.penaltyservices.co.uk.

Many rail users consider penalty fares to be an accusation of fare avoidance but this is not the case at all. A Penalty Fare is simply a higher fare which may be issued under The Penalty Fares Rules and Regulations by a member of staff who is licensed to act on behalf of a train operating company which issues penalty fares. Penalty fare warning posters are on display at every penalty fares station (as required under Regulation 8) advising customers of the consequences for boarding a penalty fares train without a valid ticket or other authority to travel in their possession.

The National Rail Conditions of Travel (NRCoT) advise that where the facility to buy a ticket exists prior to boarding, passengers should pay the correct fare for their entire journey before they travel and produce for inspection a valid ticket as evidence of their right to make a journey on the relevant train, otherwise they may be liable to pay a Penalty Fare Notice.

I understand it was thought the ticket produced for inspection was valid for the journey made, however, that isn’t the case I’m afraid.

It remains the passenger’s responsibility to confirm that their ticket is valid for their entire journey they intend making before boarding the train. This also involves checking the date of travel, that the proposed route between the stations recorded on the ticket is valid, and any other restrictions which may apply to the use of that ticket on the rail network.

As the ticket produced for inspection was not valid for the entire journey recorded on the penalty fare and the facility to check the validity of the ticket existed at the time of travel, regrettably it has been concluded by Penalty Services that the penalty fare should stand. It remains the passenger's responsibility to confirm that they have a ticket and that their ticket is valid for the entire journey they intend to make before boarding the train. This also involves checking the date of travel, that the proposed route between stations recorded on the ticket is valid, and any other restrictions which may apply to the use of that ticket on the rail network.

When a Penalty Fare Notice is issued, the amount of the penalty fare is £100.00 plus the price of the full single fare applicable. If paid before the end of the period of 21 days beginning with the day following the day on which the penalty fare is charged, the amount is £50.00 plus the price of the full single fare applicable. The full single fare applicable takes into account the age of the person in question, the day and time of the journey that person is making has made or intends to make and the train and route that person is using, has used or intends to use. Although your comments about the amount of the Penalty Fare have been noted, the amount of a Penalty Fare is set by the government, not by the rail operator.

Rest assured that Penalty Services is neither judge nor jury and we are not deciding anyone's innocence or guilt when judging appeals so your honesty is not under any scrutiny whatsoever. Similarly, because there is no onus on the train company to prove there was any intention to avoid payment of the correct fare before issuing a penalty fare, the discretion guidelines are not based on intent. Therefore, a passenger's willingness to buy a ticket after their journey had already begun would only have a bearing on their liability to pay a penalty fare if the facility to buy/extend a ticket did not exist at the origin/interchange station.

Train operating companies are not obliged to provide an app; they are obliged to ensure that it is possible to purchase a ticket prior to travel at the station. On this occasion, that facility did exist. In most instances when passengers have difficulty with the app, it is related to the fact that the apps are designed not to sell tickets for trains that are imminently departing (to avoid passengers missing trains). Whilst I don’t know if that was the issue on this occasion, it is something to bear in mind. Also, the National Rail Conditions of Travel (NRCoT) advise that where the facility to buy a ticket exists prior to boarding, passengers should pay the correct fare for their entire journey before they travel and produce for inspection a valid ticket as evidence of their right to make a journey on the relevant train, otherwise they may be liable to pay a Penalty Fare Notice. Tickets purchased after boarding are not valid and cannot be considered.

Whether a rail user is sold a ticket on board the train can depend upon many things, such as where they boarded, whether the train company issues penalty fares at all, and the role of the member of staff. Some conductors or guards are not authorised to issue penalty fares and they may check and sell tickets in transit; however, revenue inspectors are licensed to penalise passengers found to be present on the train without a valid ticket. These members of staff are only obliged to sell tickets in the circumstances set out in the discretion guidelines used by the train operator.

The conductor or guard should only be used as the first viable retail option where the facility to obtain a ticket or other authority to travel did not exist at the origin station, or where the facilities provided were not working properly, or where the queueing standards were breached by the train company.

Please note that Penalty Services is an independent appeals assessment body and carries out no other roles in the penalty fare process. When assessing an appeal, our primary concern is to understand if the penalty fare was issued in accordance with the rules and regulations in place. Penalty Services are bound to assess appeals using the code of practice which does not allow for removal or reduction of a PFN purely due to compassionate / financial reasons given by the appellant nor as a goodwill gesture for a first offence.

Having taken into consideration all the points raised to date, we regret to advise that your appeal has been unsuccessful. It is your right to re-appeal this decision. Any further appeal will be considered by a different appeal assessor. If re-appealing, please give the reason(s) why you are appealing against this decision and also mention any additional circumstances you would like taken into account. A further appeal should be submitted by post to: Penalty Services, 12 Deben Mill Business Centre, Old Maltings Approach, Woodbridge, IP12 1BL. or through our website at www.penaltyservices.co.uk/make-an-appeal/ within 14 days of the date this letter was received.

If you choose not to re-appeal and have not already paid your Penalty Fare Notice, you should pay any outstanding debt. Failure to pay can mean that the time allowed to pay the reduced amount for the Penalty Fare can run out making the amount of the Penalty Fare £100 plus the price of the full single fare applicable and further delays in payment may result in administration fees being added by the train company or its debt recovery agency.

Please also be aware that if you do not re-appeal this decision or pay the penalty fare within 14 days of the date this letter was received, the train operating company will be entitled to commence court proceedings to recover the penalty fare. Where this reply came by post to your address, the date received is assumed to be the second working day after the letter/post date as defined in paragraph 3 of schedule 2 of The Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 2018 as amended from time to time. Where you have been informed by email reply, the date received is the letter date.


"

I hear that apparently they barely even look at the first 2 appeals and I should re-submit until the 3rd appeal... Is there anything I can add so that my appeal is considered and won?

Thanks for the help.
Attached is the Fare Notice
 

Attachments

  • 1000032979.jpg
    1000032979.jpg
    279.1 KB · Views: 79
  • 1000032980.jpg
    1000032980.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 81
  • 1000032981.jpg
    1000032981.jpg
    360.2 KB · Views: 75
  • 1000032982.jpg
    1000032982.jpg
    366.5 KB · Views: 62
  • 1000032983.jpg
    1000032983.jpg
    430.9 KB · Views: 78

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
6,098
The Penalty Fare notice is incorrect in that it states no ticket was held. There was a ticket - just not for the correct date. That could be grounds for appeal?
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
18,121
This is an unfortunate incident.

Legally speaking you must possess a valid ticket before you board the train (there are some exceptions but they're not going to be relevent here). Unfortunately, however inadvertent it was, you were unable to show a valid ticket which is a criminal offence. Northern are entitled to prosecute you in the Magistrates Court if they want to. Instead, Northern have decided to deal with this by charging you a Penalty Fare which is a higher than normal fare charged to people who make an 'honest' mistake.

Ordinarily, a Penalty Fare is an appropriate remedy for this sort of thing and, although you are entirled to appeal up to three times, I would not expect an appeal to succeed. There might be some very technical reasons why the Penalty Fare is invalid, often related to signage or errors in the notice being completed. An appeal for these reasons would normally only succeed at stage 3 and such appeals must be written in very precise, legalistic terms in order to have any chance of success.

I'll let other forum members, who are more expert in this area than me, advise on a 'technical' appeal.
 

furlong

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2013
Messages
5,310
Location
Reading
At which station did you actually board the train?

For the ticket you showed that was the wrong date, what was its price and what were its origin and destination?
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,593
The woman gave me an opportunity to buy a ticket on the app but it wouldn't work because I didn't have signal, so she decided instead to just fine me £50, which seems a bit unfair for a £4 ticket.
No advice as such, but you were given the opportunity to buy a new ticket which you didn’t have to be given, so the treatment looks quite fair to me.
 

soil

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2012
Messages
2,311
£2.70, Origin New Pudsey, Destination Leeds :)
Ah, so you had an Advance ticket valid for a different date and possibly time. Unfortunately, this means a PF can be charged unless you only missed the advance due to a delay (that doesn't seem to apply here)

However, the law states:

(2A) In paragraph (1A), “the full single fare applicable” is the full single fare for the journey in question from the boarding station to the station that the penalty fare authorises the person to travel to under regulation 5(5A).

(3) In paragraph (2) and (2A), “the boarding station” means—

(a)the station at which the person boarded the train; or

(b)where the station mentioned in sub-paragraph (a) is not known to the collector, the station at which the train last made a scheduled call.

The relevant stops are:

New Pudsey - boarding
Bramley - following stop
Leeds - alight

The full single fares are:

New Pudsey - Leeds £4.30
Bramley - Leeds £4.10

So you have the ground of appeal that you quite evidently boarded at New Pudsey, and this information is known to the collector since you presumably stated that and also presented an Advance ticket with that origin.

Therefore they should have charged you a PF of £4.30, not £4.10

Therefore:

(3) The grounds on which an appeal under this regulation may be made are that—

(a)the penalty fare was not charged in accordance with the requirements of these Regulations;
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,593
Bramley - following stop
The PFN states that it was issued at Bramley, so it is reasonable to assume that at the point the next stop was actually Leeds. Essentially, you are suggesting an appeal on the basis of having been undercharged.
 

soil

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2012
Messages
2,311
The PFN states that it was issued at Bramley, so it is reasonable to assume that at the point the next stop was actually Leeds. Essentially, you are suggesting an appeal on the basis of having been undercharged.

The law doesn't make any reference to undercharging or overcharging - it just says that the amount of the PF must be from the boarding station to the next station (or subsequent station at the passenger's request), unless the boarding station isn't known. Obviously "known" is somewhat nebulous, but for a local train where the fares would be £6.50 (Halifax), £5.80 (Bradford), £4.30 (Pudsey) or Bramley (£4.10), then it does seem that the presented Pudsey - Leeds ticket does provided "knowledge" that the passenger boarded at Pudsey.

So the question of whether the fare charged is right or wrong is a matter of compliance with law, not "I have been undercharged" or "I have been overcharged - the fare is either correct, in which case the PF may be valid, or it's incorrect, in which case it is void as per Regulation 16(3)(a).
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,593
The law doesn't make any reference to undercharging or overcharging - it just says that the amount of the PF must be from the boarding station to the next station (or subsequent station at the passenger's request), unless the boarding station isn't known. Obviously "known" is somewhat nebulous, but for a local train where the fares would be £6.50 (Halifax), £5.80 (Bradford), £4.30 (Pudsey) or Bramley (£4.10), then it does seem that the presented Pudsey - Leeds ticket does provided "knowledge" that the passenger boarded at Pudsey.

So the question of whether the fare charged is right or wrong is a matter of compliance with law, not "I have been undercharged" or "I have been overcharged - the fare is either correct, in which case the PF may be valid, or it's incorrect, in which case it is void as per Regulation 16(3)(a).
Whatever, but we have seen a number of appeals rejected when that is the basis of the appeal.
 

soil

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2012
Messages
2,311
Whatever, but we have seen a number of appeals rejected when that is the basis of the appeal.

The only sensible approach is to appeal, and appeal all three times if necessary.

That is because the OP has a valid ground of appeal and during appeals the PF remains frozen at £50.

If the third appeal is unsuccessful then it might well be worth paying up, but it's unwise to do so at this point.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,343
Location
LBK
The only sensible approach is to appeal, and appeal all three times if necessary.

That is because the OP has a valid ground of appeal and during appeals the PF remains frozen at £50.

If the third appeal is unsuccessful then it might well be worth paying up, but it's unwise to do so at this point.
Agreed. Always use the appeals. I’m reasonably sure this one won’t be upheld, but the only way we can be certain is by appealing. You never know.
 

furlong

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2013
Messages
5,310
Location
Reading
Whatever, but we have seen a number of appeals rejected when that is the basis of the appeal.
We've seen all manner of valid appeals rejected!

This one though looks clear-cut as an obviously unenforceable penalty and we have seen examples where similar appeals were upheld on this basis.
 

Flangle045

Member
Joined
22 Jul 2025
Messages
7
Location
Leeds
Ah, so you had an Advance ticket valid for a different date and possibly time. Unfortunately, this means a PF can be charged unless you only missed the advance due to a delay (that doesn't seem to apply here)

However, the law states:

(2A) In paragraph (1A), “the full single fare applicable” is the full single fare for the journey in question from the boarding station to the station that the penalty fare authorises the person to travel to under regulation 5(5A).

(3) In paragraph (2) and (2A), “the boarding station” means—

(a)the station at which the person boarded the train; or

(b)where the station mentioned in sub-paragraph (a) is not known to the collector, the station at which the train last made a scheduled call.

The relevant stops are:

New Pudsey - boarding
Bramley - following stop
Leeds - alight

The full single fares are:

New Pudsey - Leeds £4.30
Bramley - Leeds £4.10

So you have the ground of appeal that you quite evidently boarded at New Pudsey, and this information is known to the collector since you presumably stated that and also presented an Advance ticket with that origin.

Therefore they should have charged you a PF of £4.30, not £4.10

Therefore:

(3) The grounds on which an appeal under this regulation may be made are that—

(a)the penalty fare was not charged in accordance with the requirements of these Regulations;
This may be completely useless to you, but the Ticket I bought for Friday was for the 16.40 train to (NPS to LDS), but the train I boarded on Thursday was the late 16.29 (NPS to LDS), I boarded it at 16.43... The 16.40 train was late, due to arrive at NPS at 16.44... Pretty sure that's unimportant or making my case worse
 

fandroid

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2014
Messages
2,561
Location
Hampshire
This may be completely useless to you, but the Ticket I bought for Friday was for the 16.40 train to (NPS to LDS), but the train I boarded on Thursday was the late 16.29 (NPS to LDS), I boarded it at 16.43... The 16.40 train was late, due to arrive at NPS at 16.44... Pretty sure that's unimportant or making my case worse
It won't make any difference. You had an Advance ticket for the wrong train, as defined by both date and time. It's as simple as that. Therefore that ticket was not valid for the train you were on.
 

soil

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2012
Messages
2,311
This may be completely useless to you, but the Ticket I bought for Friday was for the 16.40 train to (NPS to LDS), but the train I boarded on Thursday was the late 16.29 (NPS to LDS), I boarded it at 16.43... The 16.40 train was late, due to arrive at NPS at 16.44... Pretty sure that's unimportant or making my case worse

New Pudsey is NPD.
It might have some relevance

The timetable (calling at Bramley) is:

1603 (Manchester to Leeds) - departed 1604, called Bramley 1607, arrived Leeds 1616
1617 (Blackpool to York) - doesn't call at Bramley
1629 (Chester to Leeds) - arrived 1634, departed 1635 (+6), arrived &departed Bramley 1638 (+6), arrived Leeds 1645 (+4) https://www.opentraintimes.com/schedule/Y00971/2025-07-10
1640 (Halifax to Hull) - arrived 1638 departed 1639 (-1), a/d Bramley 1642/1643 (-1), arrived Leeds 1651 (-1) https://www.opentraintimes.com/schedule/Y05232/2025-07-10
1707 - (Manchester to Leeds) - too late

So it does appear that you in fact boarded the 'right' train, on the wrong day, the 1640, noting that the 1629 was already in Leeds by the 1646 issue time.

Give that is so, it would appear to be a simple mistake of having purchased the ticket for the wrong date, which you didn't notice, but the inspector did, and you boarded the 1640 train entirely unaware. As such, I can't really see any justification for them not issuing a penalty fare for the wrong amount - you clearly travelled from Pudsey, not from Bramley.
 

Flangle045

Member
Joined
22 Jul 2025
Messages
7
Location
Leeds
Forgive my cluelessness, but would I be right to think that as the 21 original days before the fare increases are 'frozen' when an appeal is being submitted?
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,091
Location
Wilmslow
Forgive my cluelessness, but would I be right to think that as the 21 original days before the fare increases are 'frozen' when an appeal is being submitted?
Yes.
(b)where that person does not intend to board a train for the purpose of travel—

(i)£100, or

(ii)if paid before the end of the period of 21 days beginning with the day following the day on which the penalty fare is charged, £50.

(4B) In calculating the period referred to in paragraph (4A)(a)(ii) or (b)(ii) no account is to be taken of any time on appeal.
 

enyoueffsea

On Moderation
Joined
26 Mar 2025
Messages
236
Location
East Midlands
I’d suggest the obvious defence from Northern would be the PFN was issued by the RPI correctly as they did not know where the passenger boarded the train and therefore it was issued at which the train last made a scheduled call.

(b)where the station mentioned in sub-paragraph (a) is not known to the collector, the station at which the train last made a scheduled call.

Whilst the OP may hold a ticket from Pudsey and state they boarded the train from there, the RPI could easily state it is unclear unless they personally witnessed the OP boarding at any particular station.

After all, the OP is on the train with a ticket for the incorrect day so the RPI may be within their rights to question their version of events.

I’ve seen this play out myself where the RPI told the person they were issuing it from x station as they cannot be sure where they entered the train.
 

furlong

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2013
Messages
5,310
Location
Reading
We already covered that higher up - it doesn't seem to be a plausible argument.
 

Flangle045

Member
Joined
22 Jul 2025
Messages
7
Location
Leeds
I know I'm bound to lose the 3rd appeal, but maybe the documentation of my case will help someone else..

Second appeal (failed) reply:
I understand you are unhappy with the outcome of your appeal and would advise that where a case
review is requested, the paperwork is passed to a different assessor and the appeal is judged again from
the beginning.

We acknowledge receipt of your recent correspondence concerning the Penalty fare issue. We have
conducted a thorough review of all relevant information at our disposal, including your previous
correspondence, and evaluated the situation carefully. Please be assured that your concerns have been
taken into account in our assessment.

Firstly, I would like to advise that I understand the journey recorded on the notice is being contested.
The first thing an assessor will judge when handling an appeal is the train company's compliance with The
Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 2018 - amended in 2022.

Failure to comply may result in the appeal being won by default, even where the circumstances presented
by the passenger wouldn't naturally lead to a successful outcome.

A Penalty Fare Notice is a legal document which Penalty Services has the right to assume is correct and
has no authority to alter. Any incorrect information recorded on a notice should be brought to the attention
of the authorised collector at the time of issue.

To determine liability, therefore, the appeal has been judged in accordance with the origin station stated on
the notice.

It is crucial to note that advance fares are only valid for the specific train and date indicated on the
ticket.

Regrettably, these fares cannot be refunded. If you require changing your travel time or date, please
ensure that you do so before the departure of the first reserved train listed on your ticket. After that point,
the ticket will no longer be valid, and you will be required to purchase a new one.

Regrettably, this situation typically does not result in a favourable outcome.

Having taken into consideration all the points raised to date, we regret to advise that your appeal has been
unsuccessful. It is your right to re-appeal this decision to the final and Independent Appeal Panel. If doing
so, please give the reason(s) why you are appealing against this decision and also mention any additional
circumstances you would like taken into account. A further appeal should be submitted by post to:


12 Deben Mill Business Centre
Old Maltings Approach
Woodbridge
IP12 1BL
www.penaltyservices.co.uk
Appeal Number:
Date: 29 July 2025

Services, 12 Deben Mill Business Centre, Old Maltings Approach, Woodbridge, IP12 1BL., or through our
website at www.penaltyservices.co.uk/make-an-appeal/ within 14 days of the date this letter was received.

If you choose not to re-appeal and have not already paid your Penalty Fare Notice, you should pay any
outstanding debt. Failure to pay can mean that the time allowed to pay the reduced amount for the Penalty

Fare can run out making the amount of the Penalty Fare £100 plus the price of the full single fare
applicable and further delays in payment may result in administration fees being added by the train
company or its debt recovery agency.

Please also be aware that if you do not re-appeal this decision or pay the penalty fare within 14 days of the
date this letter was received, the train operating company will be entitled to commence court proceedings to
recover the penalty fare.

Where this reply came by post to your address, the date received is assumed to be the second working day
after the letter/post date as defined in paragraph 3 of schedule 2 of The Railways (Penalty Fares)
Regulations 2018 as amended from time to time. Where you have been informed by email reply, the date
received is the letter date.

HOW TO PAY

You can pay in any of the following ways:
• By Card at: www.northernrailway.co.uk/paymynotice
• By Phone at 0330 022 1661.
• By Post with a Postal Order payable to: Northern Trains Limited, and posted to: Debt Recovery and
Prosecutions Unit, Northern Trains Limited, FREEPOST NEA 3188, BRADFORD, BD1 1BR.
Thank you for using Penalty Services.
 

furlong

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2013
Messages
5,310
Location
Reading
A Penalty Fare Notice is a legal document which Penalty Services has the right to assume is correct
Isn't that wrong in law?

16(3) The grounds on which an appeal under this regulation may be made are that—
(a) the penalty fare was not charged in accordance with the requirements of these Regulations;

There can be no "right" to "assume" a notice is correct when considering an appeal that it was not!

Further the regulations set out how such a disputed fact must be handled:
(4) Where the appellant makes representations as part of an appeal under this regulation in relation to any of the matters specified in paragraph (5), it is for the operator on whose behalf the penalty fare was charged to provide evidence that reasonably demonstrates that any fact described by the appellant in relation to any of those matters is not true.
(5) The matters referred to in paragraph (4) are—
(a) in circumstances where the appellant was charged a penalty fare in relation to travelling by, being present on, or leaving a train—
(i) by which train and preceding train or trains, if any, the appellant was travelling or had travelled or on which train the appellant was present or had been present;
(ii) at which station the appellant boarded the train and any preceding train or trains and at which station the appellant intended to leave that train;
(iii) whether any of the circumstances mentioned in regulations 6(2) applied;

That response might be one to take up with Transport Focus. (But do the 3rd appeal first.)
Simply assuming the notice is correct must surely breach 16(4), mustn't it?
 

enyoueffsea

On Moderation
Joined
26 Mar 2025
Messages
236
Location
East Midlands
We already covered that higher up - it doesn't seem to be a plausible argument.

In which case, what prevents a passenger saying they boarded at a different station to invalidate the PFN as soon as it’s issued?

The OP could have held a ticket from one station but said they got on at a station further down the line due to a change in plans.

Unless the RPI observes the passenger boarding at any particular station, I’m not sure how they can be held responsible for which station is recorded on the PFN and the last stop serves as a ‘catch all’ to prevent any disagreement or confusion about where a passenger boarded.
 

furlong

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2013
Messages
5,310
Location
Reading
In which case, what prevents a passenger saying they boarded at a different station to invalidate the PFN as soon as it’s issued?

The OP could have held a ticket from one station but said they got on at a station further down the line due to a change in plans.

Unless the RPI observes the passenger boarding at any particular station, I’m not sure how they can be held responsible for which station is recorded on the PFN and the last stop serves as a ‘catch all’ to prevent any disagreement or confusion about where a passenger boarded.
There is no evidence that any of this happened here so this is just introducing confusion. The regulations are clear and specific. This is an appeal - not a matter involving anyone being "held responsible".

The operator doesn't appear to have provided the information required of it by 16(4) and therefore the appeal was supposed to have been upheld by default as the operator failed to oppose it. (And if the Appeals Panel failed to ask the operator so it never knew it needed to provide this evidence, then the PF also falls away on the grounds of its being issued without the operator satisfying the appeals requirements.)
 
Last edited:

soil

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2012
Messages
2,311
In which case, what prevents a passenger saying they boarded at a different station to invalidate the PFN as soon as it’s issued?

The OP could have held a ticket from one station but said they got on at a station further down the line due to a change in plans.

Unless the RPI observes the passenger boarding at any particular station, I’m not sure how they can be held responsible for which station is recorded on the PFN and the last stop serves as a ‘catch all’ to prevent any disagreement or confusion about where a passenger boarded.

Not sure how Northern does ticket checks - this is a 3-coach train, so it wouldn't take much time to walk from one end to the other.

The schedule is

Halifax 1618
Bradford 1631
New Pudsey 1639
Bramley 1643
Leeds 1651

The PF was issued between Bramley & Leeds, at 1646.

It might well be possible for the RPI to know with certainty where the passenger boarded, simply by walking up and down the train between stops. Not sure how long it takes to issue a a penalty fare, but the PF was issued about 3 minutes after leaving Bramley, so the process might have started between Pudsey & Bramley?

In addition, as per the above:

(3) In paragraph (2) and (2A), “the boarding station” means—

(a)the station at which the person boarded the train; or

(b)where the station mentioned in sub-paragraph (a) is not known to the collector, the station at which the train last made a scheduled call.


That does suggest that the collector should find out where the passenger boarded the train, which they could do by asking the passenger. The passenger choosing to lie would not be a "get out of jail free" card - if the RPI says where did you board, and the passenger says "Pudsey", this would obviously not invalidate the PF if in fact he boarded at Braford.

The OP in this case can try and build up the evidence that the RPI knew where he boarded - firstly by reference to the ticket, and then to any other relevant facts, such as for example the process starting before reaching Bramley (if that is what happened).

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Isn't that wrong in law?

(4) Where the appellant makes representations as part of an appeal under this regulation in relation to any of the matters specified in paragraph (5), it is for the operator on whose behalf the penalty fare was charged to provide evidence that reasonably demonstrates that any fact described by the appellant in relation to any of those matters is not true.
(5) The matters referred to in paragraph (4) are—
(a) in circumstances where the appellant was charged a penalty fare in relation to travelling by, being present on, or leaving a train—
(i) by which train and preceding train or trains, if any, the appellant was travelling or had travelled or on which train the appellant was present or had been present;
(ii) at which station the appellant boarded the train and any preceding train or trains and at which station the appellant intended to leave that train;

Yes it's wrong.

The passenger has made the representation that he boarded at Pudsey.

This is an idiotic statement:

A Penalty Fare Notice is a legal document which Penalty Services has the right to assume is correct and has no authority to alter.

A PFN is a legal document - yes
no authority to alter - true, but irrelevant. it's either void or valid. altering it is not what an appeal aims to do.
has the right to assume is correct - assumed to be correct only insofar as the appellant has not challenged them. But they have, so they have lost that right.

Any incorrect information recorded on a notice should be brought to the attention of the authorised collector at the time of issue.

Lol, no, idiotic again. It's the RPI's job to collect the necessary information to issue the PF correctly, and then to issue it correctly. The PF says "from", it does not say "boarding station", so the passenger would have no reason to suspect that the information is 'incorrect' - they would assume that the RPI has got things right, because the RPI is the one who does this for a living, and they are someone who has never seen a PF before in their life.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top