alwaystouchout
Member
What sort of services would this line be seeing after 'significant' doubling?
The benefits are being presented entirely in terms of improvements to the service between Holyhead and Cardiff:What sort of services would this line be seeing after 'significant' doubling?
Note that the redoubling will provide the ability to run an additional train - no firm promise of actual additional services.As a result of these enhancements there will be:
- an ability to run an extra train every two hours between Holyhead and Cardiff via Wrexham in both directions
- a reduction of 16 minutes journey time between Holyhead and Cardiff.
What sort of services would this line be seeing after 'significant' doubling?
Probably not.NR's biggest pinch point?
Probably not.![]()
NR's biggest pinch point?
Probably in Wales.
I think Cardiff Queen Street (to give an example off the top off my head) might be a bigger pinch point.I should add,NRs(Wales) biggest pinch point I forget Network Rail is also devolved in Wales.
Hourly service from Cardiff to Holyhead has been seen on Welsh Government documents, a recent reply from the WG transport Minister to one of Merodlliw's local politicians seems to hint that this is what the re double will allow.
They have essentially deleted all the changes at the Wrexham end, meaning no alterations at Croes Newydd NF box (it will all be at Chester PSB).
A 4-mile single track is better than 9.5 but will mean about a 10-minute headway where maybe 5 would have been possible with the full scheme.
It probably means the current layout and 40mph limit at Wrexham North will stay.
Hopefully the other proposed line speeds (90 north of Rossett, 75 south) will be implemented (currently 60 throughout).
I think Cardiff Queen Street (to give an example off the top off my head) might be a bigger pinch point.
Please do not drop your aches!

Travelling Wrexham-Shrewsbury yesterday, it's evident that the remaining jointed sections of track (about 5 stretches from memory) have now all been replaced with welded rail.
However, all the old track panels are still littering the embankments :cry:.
I didn't see any sign of line speed increases, new signs etc.
In fact, because of leaf fall, the journey was punctuated with very slow approaches to places like Ruabon and Chirk.
It was also quite difficult getting going from the stop at both stations, lots of slipping evident.
Yes the Bridge over Newport Road just north of Queen Street station is another major pinch point along with the line between Queen Street and Cardiff Central stations.
If all the extra services proposed do happen then the Bridge will need to be replaced by one which can accomodate 4 tracks
We gogs have a problem with translation
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Agree its like a junk yard,one of the problems left over,due to Political interference with the redouble, I understand the old line was due to be removed when the Saltney/Wrexham line redouble was to commence in October,but WG stopped it for alleged" Value for money" so removal equipment was removed, now all the alleged saving will disappear to remove the old old junk.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Not a problem,anything Cardiff wants Cardiff gets,in my opinion.With all respect Thats how I see it.
Not quite NR have scoped it out and the answer it adds a lot of cost - which can be overcome- but perhaps more importantly it would mean closing a main artery into Cardiff city centre (Newport Road) for a couple of Months.

Agree its like closing the Wrexham Expressway to remove the single track bridge that caused us all these problems up here.But I can guess which will come first in priority, not Wrexham![]()
The bridge at Cardiff Queen Street, or Fitzalan Bridge as it used to be called, is a bottleneck after being narrowed in the Seventies. Considering the sheer volume of traffic, I guess it would be a priority over Wrexham but I doubt that anything will happen for the foreseeable future.
Apart from the side issue of stock, why can't that be accommodated by longer trains?
I agree the Rail Bridge over the Wrexham Expressway cannot compare with the Queen Street bridge with volume of rail traffic, it does however show how planning was carried out in the 70s & 80s with little or no consideration of future rail needs.
My current concern is,it appears the Wrexham General area requirements are being ignored by WG, the Network Rail drawings submitted showed an extension of dual track of under two miles from General to Wrexham North(Gresford) junction to allow a five minute headway,if this cutback goes ahead and it looks like it, an opportunity to relay the dual track I mention will be lost while equipment is on site, future requirements of growth in passenger numbers at Wrexham General need immediate attention now with the arrival of the Super Prison in 2017, this alone will generate enormous passenger footfall.
I thought the proposed Wrexham North station was going to be located closer to Rossett/Station Road?
Wrexham North Junction is just before the single track bridge at Gresford heading North, its about two miles from Wrexham General,.nothing to do with the proposed station to be Called Wrexham North which is at Rossett..
Bob
It was called Rossett when there was a station there before in pre-Beeching days. Why call it something else ?I wonder how the people of Rossett feel about their station being called Wrexham North?!! Although over the border I'm surprised there's no campaign to call it Chester South!
I wonder how the people of Rossett feel about their station being called Wrexham North?!! Although over the border I'm surprised there's no campaign to call it Chester South!