• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Why have 350110, 350111 and 350115 been denamed?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Charjabugz

Member
Joined
24 Nov 2024
Messages
6
Location
Walsall
I checked on the wikipedia page for the Class 350s today and saw that 350110's name (Project 110) isnt mentioned and 350111 (Apollo) and 350115 (Archimedes) have been denamed. Can anyone tell me why this is?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Charjabugz

Member
Joined
24 Nov 2024
Messages
6
Location
Walsall
Project 110 completed about 110 years ago so is meaningless.


were they official names and if so for what purpose?
Yes, they were official names and what do you mean by "what purpose"

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Project 110 completed about 110 years ago so is meaningless.


were they official names and if so for what purpose?
Forgot to add this to the previous message, what do you mean by "Project 110 completed about 110 years ago"? Project 110 was when they upgraded the top speed of the Class 350 to 110mph in 2013. (I think 2013)
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,939
Location
Fenny Stratford
Yes, they were official names and what do you mean by "what purpose"
Sorry - I meant was it for a competition or to commemorate something specific or some kind of project or something else? They seems 2 odd names for WCML commuter units!

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Forgot to add this to the previous message, what do you mean by "Project 110 completed about 110 years ago"? Project 110 was when they upgraded the top speed of the Class 350 to 110mph in 2013.
i was being silly. i simply meant that P110 is so long ago that it means nothing to most people now, if it ever did
 

Charjabugz

Member
Joined
24 Nov 2024
Messages
6
Location
Walsall
Sorry - I meant was it for a competition or to commemorate something specific or some kind of project or something else? They seems 2 odd names for WCML commuter units!

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


i was being silly. i simply meant that P110 is so long ago that it means nothing to most people now, if it ever did
It does not say why the two units were named and nor does it give a reference to anything i can read.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Not always very reliable though. GWR class 802 wikipedia name table being one example.
I trust wikipedia, some might say a bit too much
 

GatwickDepress

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Messages
2,588
Location
Leeds
'Apollo' and 'Archimedes' were named by Silverlink back in 2005 and denamed by London Midland shortly after taking over the franchise. Nameplates were yellow with 'West Coast Desiro' on them and presumably ended up in a depot office somewhere?

Sorry - I meant was it for a competition or to commemorate something specific or some kind of project or something else? They seems 2 odd names for WCML commuter units!

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


i was being silly. i simply meant that P110 is so long ago that it means nothing to most people now, if it ever did
Believe they were chosen by the London & North Western Railway Society and were names carried by LNWR locomotives.
 

diligentdave

Member
Joined
20 Oct 2007
Messages
443
It is common to remove decals and names from units when they are due to be handed back to the owning company.
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,905
I'm not aware that any 350/1s are to be handed back to Angel Trains.
No but also it wouldn't be surprising if the names were lost when refurbished by the subsequent operator.

Such as project 110 livery from part of 350110 which i assume was removed after going for refurbishment during the LNR programme
 

tfw756rider

On Moderation
Joined
30 Nov 2024
Messages
1,995
Location
Wales (sometimes in England), thanks for replying!
No but also it wouldn't be surprising if the names were lost when refurbished by the subsequent operator.

Such as project 110 livery from part of 350110 which i assume was removed after going for refurbishment during the LNR programme
There isn't planned to be a subsequent operator of the 350/1s for the foreseeable future. The 350/1s are staying as part of London Northwestern Railway (LNR's) electric fleet, alongside the 350/3s, 350/4s and 730/2s (and maybe some of the 350/2s, from what an LNR staff user has said).
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,878
There isn't planned to be a subsequent operator of the 350/1s for the foreseeable future. The 350/1s are staying as part of London Northwestern Railway (LNR's) electric fleet, alongside the 350/3s, 350/4s and 730/2s (and maybe some of the 350/2s, from what an LNR staff user has said).
No idea why the combined West Mids/LNR operation would need to keep any 350/2s - they're losing 78 x 323 cars and 148 x 350/2 cars but gaining 144 730/0 and 180 730/2 vehicles. That's a capacity increase of nearly 100 vehicles.
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,905
There isn't planned to be a subsequent operator of the 350/1s for the foreseeable future. The 350/1s are staying as part of London Northwestern Railway (LNR's) electric fleet, alongside the 350/3s, 350/4s and 730/2s (and maybe some of the 350/2s, from what an LNR staff user has said).
That wasnt what i was saying but i can see where you got confused.

I was referring to the transition from Silverlink to London Midland branding and then from LM to LNR branding

The refurbishments by LM and then LNR are probably why the names on those 350s were lost.

I wasn't referring to future beyond LNR
 

Defiance149

Member
Joined
30 Dec 2013
Messages
497
I checked on the wikipedia page for the Class 350s today and saw that 350110's name (Project 110) isnt mentioned and 350111 (Apollo) and 350115 (Archimedes) have been denamed. Can anyone tell me why this is?

The names on 350111 and 350115 were just vinyls, not metal. Removed in 2008 upon London Midland rebranding. Its very rare for a vinyl name to survive a livery change unsurprisingly.
 

Flange Squeal

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2012
Messages
1,861
It does not say why the two units were named and nor does it give a reference to anything i can read.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


I trust wikipedia, some might say a bit too much
Wikipedia is not always going to be reliable. For example, the Class 450 page shows a number of named units. It correctly mentions one that was named during the South West Trains era that was de-named during the South Western Railway (SWR) refurbishment/relivery process, but still lists two that also lost their names during that same process.

In fact, only one SWT naming was carried over to SWR, which was 450127 ‘Dave Gunson’ - presumably because it had only received its name the month before SWR took over, and because it was in memory of a Guard recently killed in a hit and run. Yet that unit doesn’t even get mentioned on the Wikipedia page, despite it mentioning some later SWR era namings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top