bramling
Veteran Member
Hmm - I was in a restaurant in Oxford a month or so back and overheard one of the waitresses saying she “couldn’t wait for the next lockdown”. I think you may underestimate how many people are benefiting from furlough and lockdown in various ways, even with the 80% hit.
Then there are many of my office-based colleagues who, while not furloughed, love working from home during Covid (which has been the case since March, in the company I work for), don’t do the sorts of things lockdowns forcibly restrict anyway (like shopping / restaurants / events), and who can ignore rules about socialising and other gatherings - and who are therefore of the view that measures should continue as long as possible as they directly benefit from them.
Yes I think the work from homes are a *big* driver of all this - they're loving it, especially those with a house/garden/family setup. I definitely sense some of the furloughs are starting to tire of it. Someone whose furlough is a second income may relish it, but for those whom it's the sole income it must really be starting to bite now. Of course there are presumably some companies who are topping up the 80%.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Very true indeed. Some people just don't realise the importance of people going out there and doing stuff. It's an eye opener really.
It's no different to the "I'm not leaving my house until I'm vaccinated" mentality. As I said elsewhere, if everyone took that line then there'd be no vaccine, along with no quite a few other things. I can't see such people living indefinitely on their cabbage patch!
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
It'll inevitably be a khan win. He may be absolutely useless and the city very much not in a good way, but given the calibre (or lack thereof) of the main candidate running against him it's difficult to see him losing.
I just wish they'd abolish the London mayor post completely. What is it now actually achieving?