feline1
Member
I already know what the official answer to this scenario is - but am intrigued to hear views on how reasonable people think it is.
Many TOC these days offer ITSO smartcards that you can put eTickets on, and swipe through the barriers.
I usually commute to work on one of Southern's "Key" smartcards with a monthly season ticket.
I've frequently had a problem where, on the first day of a new monthly season, the eTicket fails to "load onto" or "activate" on my card.
You're supposed to name a station to activate it at, and when you swipe through initially, it's mean to go live on your card.
Typically I'd do this at Brighton: I lay the card on the reader, it goes green, it beeps, the barrier opens: there's no indication it's failed to load...
...until I get to Victoria, and the Tube, and it's SEEK ASSISTANCE: it didn't load in Brighton after all.
What the NRCoC says here is that, to get home again, I have to buy a paper ticket and then claim a refund on it.
(You can only activate the eTicket at your designated station).
But my Key smartcard has a serial number on it, I have a printout of my confirmation of purchasing the season ticket, and I can log in to my Southern account on my phone and it shows I've bought the season there (for the given smartcard number).... ample proof that I've paid half a grand for a ticket and the only thing that's gone wrong is that Southern's IT infrastructure has failed again...
I don't understand why I should be forced to buy an additional paper ticket in these circumstances. I can prove my purchase, I have the smartcard in my hand and so nobody else can be using it in my stead.
I can't think of any other circumstance where the customer is legally obliged to pay extra if they've bought faulty goods or services!
I've never yet gotten so annoyed by this that I refused to buy the extra paper ticket, but one of these days I fear I will just loose it and tell them to get stuffed.
I'm wondering how many prosecutions TOC have tried to bring in these circumstances, and what a magistrate would say?
I fully get the concept that proof of purchase doesn't obviate the need to be able to show a valid *paper* ticket and/or railcard, because you could've given the physical ticket to someone else to use.
But that's not the case with an eTicket - if I have the card in my hand and can show the receipt, what loss can their be to the TOC?
Many TOC these days offer ITSO smartcards that you can put eTickets on, and swipe through the barriers.
I usually commute to work on one of Southern's "Key" smartcards with a monthly season ticket.
I've frequently had a problem where, on the first day of a new monthly season, the eTicket fails to "load onto" or "activate" on my card.
You're supposed to name a station to activate it at, and when you swipe through initially, it's mean to go live on your card.
Typically I'd do this at Brighton: I lay the card on the reader, it goes green, it beeps, the barrier opens: there's no indication it's failed to load...
...until I get to Victoria, and the Tube, and it's SEEK ASSISTANCE: it didn't load in Brighton after all.
What the NRCoC says here is that, to get home again, I have to buy a paper ticket and then claim a refund on it.
(You can only activate the eTicket at your designated station).
But my Key smartcard has a serial number on it, I have a printout of my confirmation of purchasing the season ticket, and I can log in to my Southern account on my phone and it shows I've bought the season there (for the given smartcard number).... ample proof that I've paid half a grand for a ticket and the only thing that's gone wrong is that Southern's IT infrastructure has failed again...
I don't understand why I should be forced to buy an additional paper ticket in these circumstances. I can prove my purchase, I have the smartcard in my hand and so nobody else can be using it in my stead.
I can't think of any other circumstance where the customer is legally obliged to pay extra if they've bought faulty goods or services!
I've never yet gotten so annoyed by this that I refused to buy the extra paper ticket, but one of these days I fear I will just loose it and tell them to get stuffed.
I'm wondering how many prosecutions TOC have tried to bring in these circumstances, and what a magistrate would say?
I fully get the concept that proof of purchase doesn't obviate the need to be able to show a valid *paper* ticket and/or railcard, because you could've given the physical ticket to someone else to use.
But that's not the case with an eTicket - if I have the card in my hand and can show the receipt, what loss can their be to the TOC?
,