Moderator note: split from
www.railforums.co.uk
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
I will answer my own (somewhat rhetorical) question:
It seems that after the very early days UK rails were laid almost exclusively on timber sleepers until part-way through WW2, when timber shortages and the need for pit-props and sleepers for reconstructing continental lines after D-Day put the pressure on. Improvements in reinforced-concrete technology after the war made them a success and the rest is history!
So all our main lines and speed records would have been on conventional timber-sleepered track up to the war - and any worries about the ablity of wooden sleepers to cope with trains at 90 mph are completely without foundation (ouch!)
Transpennine Route Upgrade and Electrification updates
Well it was suggested in the Manchester - Liverpool Electrification thread that we have a seperate Transpennine thread. Now I know that Manchester - Stalybridge is actually part of the Northern Hub project , but to me, haulage bashing Peaks in the 1970s-1980s - Liverpool-Newcastle was classed as...
what sleepers were in use when Mallard set the speed record, or for the LMS attempt (which didn't wreck their loco?)Can it accommodate an increase in linespeed through? 75mph to 90mph I believe is the plan.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
I will answer my own (somewhat rhetorical) question:
It seems that after the very early days UK rails were laid almost exclusively on timber sleepers until part-way through WW2, when timber shortages and the need for pit-props and sleepers for reconstructing continental lines after D-Day put the pressure on. Improvements in reinforced-concrete technology after the war made them a success and the rest is history!
So all our main lines and speed records would have been on conventional timber-sleepered track up to the war - and any worries about the ablity of wooden sleepers to cope with trains at 90 mph are completely without foundation (ouch!)
Last edited: