Is there a trolley?
Some of us are old enough to remember this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/south_yorkshire/5036530.stm
It is believed the two youths arrived on BMX bikes and entered the yard next to Sheffield airport unnoticed.
![]()
The suspects were captured on CCTV as they entered the yard
I thought the engine stop button in the back cab of a 156 would shut down both engines it wouldnt bring about a quick stop like applying brakes would butIt all depends on what type of train we're talking about. On a loco hauled or HST, ie something with a brake pipe running the length of the train, any breach of this pipe would result in the brakes being applied. This could be passenger communication apparatus, Guards emergency valve, Emergency brake plunger in rear cab.
On a DMU with EBS/TPWS isolated the pass-comm and other systems will be by-passed, but it would still be possible to stop the train, albeit not as quickly as desired.
If I were in the situation (On say a 2 car 156) I would apply the Parking Brake IC which would apply the parking brake and start to retard the train speed, although it would take a long time to bring the train to a stand. My next step would be to trip the Local Control CB in the rear cab which would shut an engine down along with it's associated compressor. It may help to "toggle" the Low Main Air Governor in the cab, which would fool the system into thinking there was insufficient air in the Main Res and apply the brakes. I think that should work even if the EBS was raised, but have never actually tried it funnily enough!
Nobody said it had to be stopped quickly , decide stealing one that is about to go off to the MDD to get fueled up could actually mean it stops pretty quickly .That sounds even less useful than turning off the electricity!
Stingers on the line! Call in the army, Chally 2 across the tracks! Have NASA crash a rocket into it!
CALL DOCTOR WHO!
I thought the engine stop button in the back cab of a 156 would shut down both engines
There was a picture... does this look like anyone we know from 2006?Actually, it looks like a lot of people I know from 2006
![]()
Whats to stop a lorry driver going on the rampage?
I bet that would make quite a mess!
Jesus Christ grow a pair!! And if you read this thread, you read the comm cord might not exactly work!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In many (most?) modern trains the communication cord (or passenger alarm) is in no way connected to the brakes. So all you would do is make the driver more angry.All I have to add is that, were I on a train, as soon as I was convinced that something was very wrong (eg not slowing down where it should be slowing down) I would have no hesitation in activating the communication cord and bringing it to an abrupt halt.
The problem is that certain very unsavoury people might get ideas from reading this sort of thing. I just think it is unwise.
The problem is that certain very unsavoury people might get ideas from reading this sort of thing. I just think it is unwise.
certainly the few incidents I have seen in the press of lorry drivers falling asleep at the wheel and ploughing into traffic have resulted in fatalities .
I could imagine in a targeted way that would cause some damage
I personally would go with a 185As an unsavoury person I'm now revising my plans so as not to hijack a class 156.

I'm not sure this thread and some of the information provided on it is a very wise thing to do on a publically viewable forum in the current climate, and to be honest I'm a little uncomfortable that it is still here.
All I have to add is that, were I on a train, as soon as I was convinced that something was very wrong (eg not slowing down where it should be slowing down) I would have no hesitation in activating the communication cord and bringing it to an abrupt halt.
The fitter who checked the train soon after stabling just signed off the fault on the rear handbrake as NDF (No Defect Found). About 2 or 3 hours later the train went for a roll from Queens Park heading South and made it as far as Oxford Circus before rolling back down to Regents Park. There were supposed to be staff working on the track who cut away early - had they not they would have been killed by the runaway. Doesn't really matter what powers the train but more how the braking systems work. Would imagine today they are far more failsafe but not necessarily so.
In a few months time I might see how far West of Worting jn a 455 can get!![]()
Whats to stop a lorry driver going on the rampage?
I bet that would make quite a mess!
I remember the 08 joyriders after that event they had to chain and lock the cab doors.
A signalman working in Carlisle Panel had to divert a runaway freight in 1984, where by the diverted runaway demolished a bridge over the River Caldew just passed the old junction of, bog junction and Rome street junction on the old freight avoildings lines in Carlisle.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cumbria/8417743.stm
http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/m...evented-major-rail-crash-in-carlisle-1.647845
In a few months time I might see how far West of Worting jn a 455 can get!![]()

Maybe that's really what happened to 455743 to 455749 - someone drove them off the 3rd rail and they disappeared off TOPS for ever![]()
Wouldn't the possession have been protected with dets that would have given the p-way gang some warning of the train heading their way?
Wouldn't the possession have been protected with dets that would have given the p-way gang some warning of the train heading their way?