If anyone is ringing 999, could they not ask for BTP rather than just the police? I’m sure the operator could put the call direct through to them in the same way they can the coastguard for example.
No, BTP is not contactable via the 999 system. Evening if asking specifically for British Transport Police you will be routed to the appropriate Home Office force for your telephone.
There are industry internal 999 equivalent numbers for BTP (and emergency service interagency numbers) but no external facing number.
BTP specifically, maybe. A generic Home Office force maybe [likely, IMO] not. Ambulance NHS Trusts also have very differing policies between them and I would not be surprised if they’re scratching around for a telephone number for Network Rail, or if they’d default to asking BTP to help play Chinese whispers.
I find this to not match my admittedly one experience of calling 999 to report a sheep which had wandered onto the tracks. I don't actually recall if it was BTP I spoke to, but it was a BTP panda car which turned up a few minutes later! This was admittedly over a decade ago so maybe the policy or procedure has changed?
It is possibly worth noting this from the BTP's
website:
BTP said:
Contact us
By phone
Emergency 999
And from the British Transport Police Authority
website:
BTPA said:
British Transport Police (BTP) – 0800 40 50 40 or visit BTP’s website or dial 999 in an emergency
It may be true that by calling 999 and asking for the police you'll be initially routed through to the local constab, but I'd stop short of saying that BTP is not contactable via the 999 system. Even if there's a "middle man" involved, or an extra call step, BTP can be contacted by 999, and the only reason I really raise this point is that members of the public who find this post should feel confident that in an emergency on the railways they can call 999 and the police will respond, instead of potentially taking time to Google a BTP or Network Rail emergency number.
There's some good advice in this thread about what people
should do to get help in an emergency, but I think the average passenger is unlikely to look up the Network Rail emergency number or know what sort of light signal to make with the torch on their phone, nor trust the public to be able to recall and do this under the pressure of an emergency really. I expect the vast majority of people would do one of three things - use a passenger emergency alarm on a train or at a station, call 999, or wave frantically at the train if it's approaching. All of these would be acceptable really, and while a driver may know that two hands raised in the air is an emergency stop signal, I'm pretty sure drivers would take something like a frantic waving of arms to also be a signal to stop (assuming it didn't look like a child waving at a train to toot their horn!)
In some countries the hand gesture is hands held steady above the head, others it's flashing a lamp with an arm into and out of the torso gesture, and in others it's an arm making and up and down gesture. In some cases these signals actually mean completely different things in different countries, so I really wouldn't rely on passengers knowing this and I probably wouldn't invest money into signage trying to educate them of it either. It would probably just be safer to install passenger assistance points with [functional] emergency comms, and encourage 999 handlers to route to BTP for reports of things on the railways.
For those reasons, my advice to members of the public would be to use an emergency alarm on a train or at a station, dial 999, or make a gesture which looks like distress. I personally wouldn't even bother trying things like the Network Rail emergency number or the BTP's non-emergency numbers or even trying to remember which hand/lamp signal the UK uses.