82126 will stay with the Pretendalino at WB as spare/charter rake. 82101 and the spare RFM are being returned to Porterbrook.
Nothing is going to be scrapped.
I would assume that they will be returned to the leasing company on the day that the new franchise was meant to commence, December 9th; the same date that the Pretendolino rake will be stood down onto standby and charter use only.So DVT 82101 and RFM 10217 are going to be returned to Porterbrook. TBH, this doesn't surprise me as I don't think they have ever been used in revenue earning service. Hell, 82101 hasn't even been repainted. Any word on when they will be returned? Is there a source?
I would assume that they will be returned to the leasing company on the day that the new franchise was meant to commence, December 9th; the same date that the Pretendolino rake will be stood down onto standby and charter use only.
was looking on a photo site and there is two 82101 and 82126 and it say there put on the scrap line thats why i asked the site is carl watson i may be wrong but wanted too know if anyone had an idea could it be related too the pretendolino not being used after dec
Yeah both 82101 and 82126 were down there recently for a bogie swap. This might just have meant swapping the worn bogies on 82126 for those on 82101 if they were in better condition, I don't know.has it not just had some work done on it at Eastleigh?
Those photos are of the two DVTs on their recent visit to Eastleigh for a bogie swap. There is no mention of them being "put on the scrap line". It is the "Niteq", Eastleigh's battery powered shunter, photos of which are contained in the same album, that has been moved onto the scrap line.was looking on a photo site and there is two 82101 and 82126 and it say there put on the scrap line thats why i asked the site is carl watson i may be wrong but wanted too know if anyone had an idea could it be related too the pretendolino not being used after dec
Yeah both 82101 and 82126 were down there recently for a bogie swap. This might just have meant swapping the worn bogies on 82126 for those on 82101 if they were in better condition, I don't know.
On the description of the pics it says the nites is shunted onto the scrap line that's why I asked if anyone knew I thought they would be too good to scrap
These ones:Which pictures? (Unless I'm being blind), nobody has linked any here...
30th October 2012 - Eastleigh Works
DVTs 82101 and 82126 arrive behind 47802 and 47501
The Niteq is shunted onto the scrap line
82101 and 82126 were sent to Eastleigh for bogie swap as stated above. 82101 had previously received new wheelsets after an incident left it with severe falts. 82126 now sports almost full sized wheels.
82101 will be returned to PB at the franchise change and is likely to be put into storage.
I would have thought that DB would have used another DVT that they already owned for such a task. As far as I know, 82128 was still owned by Porterbrook.It was also probably used as a Christmas tree to help with the 82/3 rebuilds.
Adam![]()
I would have thought that DB would have used another DVT that they already owned for such a task. As far as I know, 82128 was still owned by Porterbrook.
82101 and 82126 were sent to Eastleigh for bogie swap as stated above. 82101 had previously received new wheelsets after an incident left it with severe falts. 82126 now sports almost full sized wheels.
82101 will be returned to PB at the franchise change and is likely to be put into storage.