Anyone who's done decent mileage in an EV probably already knows to just avoid BP Pulse! i don't think i've ever seen any that are decently maintained.
It's more the 92p per kWh that I avoid them for.To be fair the Shell near me has recently installed some decent CCS chargers and they were all in use last Saturday. It's the charger with the four buttons below a non-touch screen if that rings any bells.
To be fair the Shell near me has recently installed some decent CCS chargers and they were all in use last Saturday. It's the charger with the four buttons below a non-touch screen if that rings any bells.
Yes, but a key benefit of a ZEV over an IC, low-cost overnight charging, for long day-time journeys by ZEV the fuel cost is " pocket change".Why?
200 miles on a motorway is almost 3 hours of driving. You should have taken a decent break in that time, at which point you can charge up. Even 180 miles is over 2.5 hours, so I'd still be having a break part way through that drive.
Absolutely but people with no home charging wont leave on 100% and wont want to get home with close to 0% charge. Its not the actual charging time either its the faff of getting to a charger. I agree that for a proportion of the population EVs are ideal but to suggest its a better solution than ICE cars universally is deeply flawed.184 miles easily doable at motorway speeds in many EVs. And even if it did need a charge, it’s 5 minutes not 30 for that sort of distance.
I believe something like two thirds of households have access to off street parking - which most likely means they have access to home charging, even if its just from a 13A socket.Absolutely but people with no home charging wont leave on 100% and wont want to get home with close to 0% charge. Its not the actual charging time either its the faff of getting to a charger. I agree that for a proportion of the population EVs are ideal but to suggest its a better solution than ICE cars universally is deeply flawed.
There will be as much ire amongst those that have opted to pay more for homes with off-road parking and the cost of installation of a charger if they are also subsidising those that didn't (or couldn't) pay for those facilities for their chosen EVs.When petrol cars become unviable because getting the fuel becomes too impractical, charging away from home needs to be a similar price to home charging, otherwise people forced into electric cars will be outraged because of the perceived unfairness, even if they are paying less than they currently pay. Not sure how this can be achieved. Maybe by then technology and market forces will dramatically bring down the cost of EV charging, or there could be price capping, similar to how domestic electricity is capped. Or maybe home charging will be taxed and it will be required to isolate EV charging from other domestic electricity.
It's not a faff. Car drivers you to the exact location.Absolutely but people with no home charging wont leave on 100% and wont want to get home with close to 0% charge. Its not the actual charging time either its the faff of getting to a charger. I agree that for a proportion of the population EVs are ideal but to suggest its a better solution than ICE cars universally is deeply flawed.
Yes, market forces will bring it down. I also don't think these off peak EV tariffs are sustainable long term (they are selling at a loss a lot of the time against wholesale prices). I mean the ones which give you 6p/kwh for a few hours overnight, the wholesale cost of electricity is more than that most of the time. Octopus Intelligent is more sustainable as they move it to the cheaper parts.When petrol cars become unviable because getting the fuel becomes too impractical, charging away from home needs to be a similar price to home charging, otherwise people forced into electric cars will be outraged because of the perceived unfairness, even if they are paying less than they currently pay. Not sure how this can be achieved. Maybe by then technology and market forces will dramatically bring down the cost of EV charging, or there could be price capping, similar to how domestic electricity is capped. Or maybe home charging will be taxed and it will be required to isolate EV charging from other domestic electricity.
Indeed. We've just commissioned a site (not EV charging) connected to 11kV. We have a 2MW import limit.The issue right now is that it costs a fortune to have a grid connection - a 1MW grid connection for a 12 bay ultra charger would cost probably £5,000/month in "standing charges", before you sell any energy. If you have poor utilisation of that it really adds up. But if it was busy most hours of the day, you split that charge AND the fixed costs of the site over far more kWhs.
DUoS = Distribution Use of System, the high voltage network that moves electricity across the country.Indeed. We've just commissioned a site (not EV charging) connected to 11kV. We have a 2MW import limit.
Standing charge £6,500 per month.
TNUoS and DNUoS charges probably £100k per year between them.
That's before we've actually paid for the electricity itself.
There will be as much ire amongst those that have opted to pay more for homes with off-road parking and the cost of installation of a charger if they are also subsidising those that didn't (or couldn't) pay for those facilities for their chosen EVs.
There will be as much ire amongst those that have opted to pay more for homes with off-road parking and the cost of installation of a charger if they are also subsidising those that didn't (or couldn't) pay for those facilities for their chosen EVs.
I see your point, however there is still the convenience of being able to charge at home and not to make a special trip to an EV charging site. Maybe in the future EV charging away from home will be so quick and affordable that people won't be that bothered about home charging.
You are assuming that all that off-street parking is adjacent to where the driver lives. A lot of off-street space is in communal areas, and even if you have a designated parking bay in that space it may be too far away from your residence to run a cable across.I believe something like two thirds of households have access to off street parking - which most likely means they have access to home charging, even if its just from a 13A socket.
On the other hand, substantial numbers of people with on street parking will be able to obtain home charging through use of cross-pavement gullies and similar methods for carrying cables across the footway.You are assuming that all that off-street parking is adjacent to where the driver lives. A lot of off-street space is in communal areas, and even if you have a designated parking bay in that space it may be too far away from your residence to run a cable across.
Car pooling only works if enough people living in the same area travel to/from the same work area, and pretty much have the same working hours all the time.We could also minimise the home charging infrastructure needed by having more car pooling. RAC Research suggest cars spend 95% of their time parked, split roughly 75% spent at home and 20% elsewhere. Obviously you need to account for peak flow times like commuting hours when you calculate demand for pooling, but certainly where I live most cars are just sat there all day with the occasional use. If people were willing to pool car more, not only could they save money, but the number of chargers would be reduced.
Apologies, by pool cars I meant car-sharing schemes like ZipCar or Enterprise Rent-A-Car, where anyone can sign up and rent a car by the hour.Car pooling only works if enough people living in the same area travel to/from the same work area, and pretty much have the same working hours all the time.
With the increase of suburbs, edge of town commercial/industrial areas, shift working and flexible working; the chances of a near neighbour having the same travel needs is unlikely.
That will be the ZipCar that ceased its UK operations at the end of 2025 because it was losing money.Apologies, by pool cars I meant car-sharing schemes like ZipCar or Enterprise Rent-A-Car, where anyone can sign up and rent a car by the hour.
ZipCar was one example.That will be the ZipCar that ceased its UK operations at the end of 2025 because it was losing money.
People want door to door journeys, they don't want to travel to wherever the nearest pool car is parked. Especially true if the journey involves luggage.
And what is the optimal number of pool cars that need to be available per 100 households, to ensure that everybody's need can be met without undue delay? Whilst many journeys (especially long ones) are pre-planned, so many are undertaken at short notice. It's the latter that prompts many people to own their own transport.ZipCar was one example.
Currently operating in London, unless they've also all halted, are Hiyacar, Turo, Co-Wheels, and Enterprise Car Club.
There's clearly some demand for it still. Obviously not everybody is going to sell their car and use car sharing schemes, but it works for many and could work for more if rolled out further, especially like the apartment blocks example.
6,471?And what is the optimal number of pool cars that need to be available per 100 households, to ensure that everybody's need can be met without undue delay? Whilst many journeys (especially long ones) are pre-planned, so many are undertaken at short notice. It's the latter that prompts many people to own their own transport.
A minicab driver, running a ZEV told me a failure of running out of battery charge is not a free recovery by breakdown services, he said the towing fee for recovery from a motorway is £350, is he correct?To be fair, you’d have to be out of your tree to drive 100 to 0% on a motorway in a short(er) range EV. You’d want atleast 10 or 20 miles buffer so there’s no risk of power output dropping, so that takes you to 160 miles of range. Then say it’s cold in the winter and you can shave another 10-20 miles off that. Then if you don’t leave the house on 100% charge you’re lopping off another chunk of miles.
A 200 mile range EV is nice (and significantly better than what my own 150 mile EV can do!), but it’s not difficult for such a car to end up with a fairly paltry range, and needing a 30 minute charge every 90 minutes to keep it going at motorway speed
Might as well ask a breakdown company:A minicab driver, running a ZEV told me a failure of running out of battery charge is not a free recovery by breakdown services, he said the towing fee for recovery from a motorway is £350, is he correct?
RAC said:What does RAC Breakdown Cover include?
EV experts
Our patrols know electric cars inside out – and our award‑winning EV Boost vans can give you up to 10 miles to reach the nearest charge point.

AA said:What does breakdown cover include?
Running out of fuel or charge
Fuel or charge may be given or your vehicle towed to a petrol station or charging point.