Busaholic
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2014
- Messages
- 14,671
For 'evil' read 'entitled and narcissistic'?An independent candidate not having much policy substance meaning he is evil is quite a jump
For 'evil' read 'entitled and narcissistic'?An independent candidate not having much policy substance meaning he is evil is quite a jump
Yes, one less path / garden gate / letter box / saved bit of paper to do!Just had a Lib-Dem leaflet dropped through the door with the post. First communication since the election was called....although the new Tory candidate put out a very impressive illustrated leaflet soon after her candidacy was announced back in February. Nothing from any other parties....but local Labour canvassers may have swerved us as we have several Labour posters in the windows, as my wife is a party member.
Yeah, it was more facetious really. I just find the whole thing deeply weird. If the only reason you're providing for people to vote for you is that you're local and not a career politician, then really you need to both be local, and be standing against a career politician.
From https://edinburghpeople.org/I have goose bumps when I explain that I have realised the single lynch-pin flaw in our system of politics. The reason being is that I have also realised the solution.
The curse is career politicians…
Sitting MP Joanna Cherry (SNP) has a small strapline SNP - for Scotland, but otherwise doesn't mention the party or its policies and boasts of being a thorn in their side. Pushing herself as independent. Opposes 'top-down' climate crisis policies and supports 'rights of women and girls'. Picture of candidate.
Don’t mention that foreigner Jules Rimet (still gleaming), though.
Maybe if other parties are scared of not getting in to power again because they're unattractive to 16-17 year-olds and foreign residents of the UK then they should try and be more attractive to those groups?
Radical thinking I know.
From https://edinburghpeople.org/
If I used the first person that much to convince others to vote for me, please call me too self interested.
His Twitter has pro ceasefire and anti ulez tweets/retweets, but no clarification on policy, that’s at https://edinburghpeople.org/policies/. It seems like standard populist form. I think he wants them to become the biggest party in Edinburgh before they form opinions. “Career politicians are ok” will be one of them.
The Net Zero targets are too ambitious and are coming at too great a cost. It is important to evaluate which policies are working and which are not before they are rolled out. It has been calculated that the cost of adapting to climate change is estimated at being less than 10% of the cost of stopping climate change. It is important to consider that the climate has always changed because of cyclical factors. The constantly changing angle of tilt of the earth’s axis and the constantly changing shape of the earth’s elliptical orbit around the sun have forever caused our climate to change.
The definition of a woman must not be changed to include men who have transitioned to becoming woman-like. Men who have transitioned to become woman-like should not be allowed to compete in women’s sport.
They sound no different to ukip/reform or any other right wing populist nonsense. Anti science, anti equality, anti environment, anti vax, anti 5g, anti cycle paths, anti trans. But with a token bit of leftism (no NHS privitisation)Re-reading the
They sound a bit like the SDP (version 2.0). Leftish on some issues but full on populist right on others. For example (from https://edinburghpeople.org/policies/):
and
Galloway's party was my thought. Or Rahman's tower hamlets first. Localist , with some populist right causes , but also pro Palestine, unlike the others he doesn't seem to be chasing the Muslim vote though.They sound a bit like the SDP (version 2.0). Leftish on some issues but full on populist right on others. For example (from https://edinburghpeople.org/policies/):
and
I'm glad somebody could be bothered to find the policy section. I was struggling with the intense wall of nonsense in the candidate profiles.They sound no different to ukip/reform or any other right wing populist nonsense. Anti science, anti equality, anti environment, anti vax, anti 5g, anti cycle paths, anti trans. But with a token bit of leftism (no NHS privitisation)
Nothing about immigration, asylum or Europe, which seems a strange ommission considering the rest of their platform.
Before the dissolution Brock was Edinburgh North and Leith, Cherry Edinburgh Southwest.She was MP up until 3 years ago and now we're under the equally dreadful (although her heart is in the right place and she's actually a rather nice lady) Deirdre Brock
There also wasn't an election 3 years ago, so I'd guess the poster moved.Before the dissolution Brock was Edinburgh North and Leith, Cherry Edinburgh Southwest.
Given the performance of the 'government' over the last five years, I suspect that they will be having severe difficulties recruiting many volunteers to go canvassing.Labour party people round again yesterday afternoon. No sign of the incumbent Tories. Have they given up?
You could have put in the recycling!When the Scottish Greens leaflet came through the post last week, I just ripped it up.
Seriously, don't bother your backside about that lot - it's a guaranteed lost deposit!Just reading the Scottish Family Party manifesto now, its horrible. Don't know how anyone could feel comfortable voting for these, its sexist, hypocritical, and transphobic among others. Also them wanting to defund any organisation, that promotes equality, I also get the impression from their manifesto, that they think the parents are always right and if a child comes into school saying they're being abused by the parents, that the party won't believe the child, as issues like that should be kept away from school according to them.
Horrible manifesto.
I don't know if my anxiety/depression is worsening or whether it’s because I’ve been off work for so long… my sleep has been horrific the past four days. It’s 2am and the smallest things are setting me up to fail. It’s like I’ve got a bout of existential dread over politics - right now I’m not sure I can deal with another 5 years of Tories!. I’m constantly questioning myself that Sunak has either:
Is it just me?
- Asked the party faithful to vote Labour in opinion polls to skew the result so it looks like Labour are winning when they’re not,
- Paid off the various companies with his many millions to skew the polls,
- Will launch an all out offensive this week as seen by the united front of the various right leaning tabloids today.
Indeed, I think "the shires" is where they will cling on, with huge majorities still. No chance of Truss going, for example, sadly. And Hancock's old seat will surely remain true blue, even if he himself has gone.I think the Tories will cling onto 100+ seats rather than the various projections of under 100. The tactical anti Tory vote isn't obvious in some seats, and they still have deeper roots in the shires compared the new arrival Reform UK.
Do you think that these chancers have got the intelligence or ability to run such an involved conspiracy? They cant even work out if Wales have qualified for the Euros!
- Asked the party faithful to vote Labour in opinion polls to skew the result so it looks like Labour are winning when they’re not,
- Paid off the various companies with his many millions to skew the polls,
- Will launch an all out offensive this week as seen by the united front of the various right leaning tabloids today.