There are a heck of a lot of jobs that do require physical presence- research laboratories, manufacturing, medical, care etc. Teaching can be somewhat remotely done for some subjects, but not all, and is generally better with physical presence.
So, we can't all home-work. Further, our internet infrastructure is not high enough capacity and ribust enough to cope with the huge demand than running all those VPN connections would put on it from the security requirments of those jobs that could be done from home.
(I work in a lab, but I do cycle to work. Cycle provision, even in the Cambridge area, is frequently lousy and too-often downright dangerous).
the main barriers though are cultural. Especially in this country, owning a house with a garden is an aspirational thing. Owning a car is seen as a status thing.
I think that's the main point I took from urbandingdong's posts. We need to look at the culture we live in and consider whether we are happier for living the way we do. Yes, it's aspirational to own a house with a garden in aleafy suburb, or more commonly these days in a rural 'idyll'. Mostly, this requires at elast one car per working person, so cars are mostly mor eof a necessity than a symbol of status due to lifestyle choices.
But the price to pay for this lifestyle is pollution, long journey times to and from work, frustration over either traffic jams or delayed and overcrowded trains, and the cost of travelling. whether by road, rail or bus, the cost of travelling can be pretty high and seems likely to only get worse.
Meanwhile, the rural areas suffer a loss of community as the commuters tend not to use the local services so much when they are working in a city every day - a village dweller may not go into the city every day for milk, bread or things like that, but when you are in the city almost every day anyway, it's easy t pick up these things in a supermarket on the way.
I wonder if the price we have paid as a society is worth people chasing the dream, which may not be a dream at all!
