• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

third rail in depots

Status
Not open for further replies.

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
Shed based isolations that are designed to be switched on and off regularly will have some kind of control on the individual road which won't need contact with the the ECRO.

Will that be a switch/breaker with a cover over it that can be padlocked shut?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

dgl

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2014
Messages
3,062
Will that be a switch/breaker with a cover over it that can be padlocked shut?

If it's anything like the video on youtube for shed protection that deals with a shed with 25kv electrification and there are lock off boxes covering the isolation switch designed to be used with multiple padlocks.
 

Bigfoot

Established Member
Joined
2 Dec 2013
Messages
1,419
Will that be a switch/breaker with a cover over it that can be padlocked shut?

Having worked only in sheds with overhead trolley supplies (shore supply) I can't comment on railed sheds, though they are rare I believe especially when it comes to maintenence sheds.

But yes shore supplies can be individually locked off. Though not so much cover over a breaker more just a key switch on the shore supply.
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
Having worked only in sheds with overhead trolley supplies (shore supply) I can't comment on railed sheds, though they are rare I believe especially when it comes to maintenence sheds.

But yes shore supplies can be individually locked off. Though not so much cover over a breaker more just a key switch on the shore supply.

I was thinking it might have been done with a lockable cover over a breaker to allow multiple people to work on different aspects of a unit so that the 3rd rail can't be powered up again whilst someone is too close to it working on some aspect of a unit
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,685
Location
Scotland
I was thinking it might have been done with a lockable cover over a breaker to allow multiple people to work on different aspects of a unit so that the 3rd rail can't be powered up again whilst someone is too close to it working on some aspect of a unit
That's the system I've seen used for 25kV supplies. Each person working on the unit attaches their own padlock meaning the breaker can't be switched back on until everyone has finished working and taken their padlock back off.
 

R4_GRN

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2012
Messages
135
I am a big fan of the H And S act but not how it is applied by some over zealous people who are more interested in protecting their pensions. However surely to remove the slightest chance of someone being killed it should have been made the law that the power is not available in a maintenance shed? The obvious way is to have diesel shunters only moving units completely removes the risk, never mind the cost. It is no consolation if you are killed by a million to one chance. Why do the unions not fight this case I can see the point of this to protect people
 

Elecman

Established Member
Joined
31 Dec 2013
Messages
3,577
Location
Lancashire
I am a big fan of the H And S act but not how it is applied by some over zealous people who are more interested in protecting their pensions. However surely to remove the slightest chance of someone being killed it should have been made the law that the power is not available in a maintenance shed? The obvious way is to have diesel shunters only moving units completely removes the risk, never mind the cost. It is no consolation if you are killed by a million to one chance. Why do the unions not fight this case I can see the point of this to protect people

And how do you propose to power units up for testing during maintenance if you don't have any power available in the shed?
 

R4_GRN

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2012
Messages
135
Good point elecman, but still up to the designer of the shed to ensure the safety of all the people working inside. I am not in the industry so maybe blinkered but as an engineer responsible for others safety I always completely removed the risk of danger
 

R4_GRN

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2012
Messages
135
Is that similar to the system I saw on an episode of salvage squad repairing a Blackpool tram? There was an isolator switch with a bracket fitted which had holes for a number of padlocks, each operator had the only key so one person not removing his padlock effectively isolated the tram.
Having said that power was overhead not at ground level so less of a risk neverless the risk should be completely removed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top