Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
Last edited by a moderator:
That's as may be, but isn't it true technically that Nottingham was played from Beeston? Surely if play as far as Beeston is void then all subsequent moves are too?Nottingham was valid from Melton Mowbray though - I posted a link to this service (hyperlink on Nottingham in second line) http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/C62770/2018/03/20/advanced
In that case, perhaps it would be wiser to continue with the current adjudication - i.e., that play recommences from Melton Mowbray?I have requested an adjudication, as Beeston was definitely invalid.
Darren R is an adjudicator so please ensure you comply with any adjudications he gives in future. I'm going to strike through all posts after Melton Mowbray so please continue from there; post 112347.I can only find services in the opposite direction.
Melton Mowbray was the last valid post; can I ask all subsequent posts be struck-through.