4-SUB 4732
Established Member
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2018
- Messages
- 2,150
Yes I agree with you, high speed services should definitely be a separate franchise run by a completely different TOC to the mainline services. It would be even better if they made it a condition that applicants could only apply for either the mainline or high speeds franchise but not both. The competition would definitely lead to better offers.
No I don't think that is right at all. Where did this "need" for more stopping services come from? A village such as Plucky or Marden although very nice, does not require 2+ trains an hour. This is evidenced by the fact that Southeastern used to skip them pre-HS1 days and still drops these from the calling pattern sometimes today. However much busier towns such as Ramsgate, Sandwich, Deal, Dover, Faversham - Rochester inclusive have much more demand but have suffered by having their services cut and journey times increased to serve smaller towns and villages with increased services and frequencies.
Shifting the demand from these places onto a different line and charging them a fortune to use it , just so that a few quiet towns and villages can have more services than necessary is absolutely absurd. The Ashford - Tonbridge line had so much investment put into it for Eurostar services which is now completely going to waste. A perfectly good mainline has become a giant metro service for the rural locations it used to run through.
Villages and rural locations are not meant for hundreds of people to commute to London quickly from, the same as cities are not meant for those wanting a quiet life, big house, a large garden and nice scenery.
Had you asked passengers at the time, nobody in this part of Kent would have agreed to their mainline being slowed down in exchange for a high speed line to the other side of London they wish to travel to, for which they had to pay a premium to use.
As for being "financially unbalanced", if the HS premium is required to subside these unneeded metro stopping services in order for them to be affordable to run, then the answer is obviously that they should scrap them to reduce costs. It is not fair that we are made to pay for them just so that the books are kept balanced.
What would happen if HS fare became so high that passengers decided to wake up early in the morning and swapped to the classic lines? I doubt Southeastern would struggle to run services as normal.
And amazingly in the new Invitation to Tender whilst they drop the Chatham Main Line to a rubbish, half-hourly frequency calling all stations they are bringing back express services on the South Eastern Main Line with 8tph leaving Charing Cross.
2tph Hastings express calling Waterloo East, London Bridge, Tonbridge and then relevant stops down towards the Coast
2tph Tunbridge Wells semi-fast calling Waterloo East, London Bridge, Orpington, Sevenoaks, Tonbridge etc.
2tph East Kent fast calling Waterloo East, London Bridge, Sevenoaks, Tonbridge, Ashford etc.
2tph Ashford slow calling Waterloo East, London Bridge, Orpington, Sevenoaks, Hildenborough Tonbridge etc.
So if the demand exists for fast trains from Ashford to London Bridge, are we likely to see re-appropriation of paths to force more Medway and Kent Coast passengers onto HS units whilst the East Kent crowd are offered more fast trains via Tonbridge? Very interesting times ahead.

