Yes, with even more if you can get Luton airport in too!Would GatLink get me your bonus points?
Yes, with even more if you can get Luton airport in too!Would GatLink get me your bonus points?
Any reason why a 700 is missing almost all its white diagonal stripes ?
Network Southeast.
But Peterborough was never part of Network SouthEast...
I don't see what is confusing about 'Thameslink'
'Thameslink' will simply gain more routes and will become a much larger operation than previously with all of the routes going through the core.
Not confusing at all.
But Peterborough was never part of Network SouthEast...

Are all the Blackfriars-Sevenoaks workings still 319s on a Saturday, as I'm hoping to grab one or two on Thameslink this afternoon?![]()
The arguement put forward by BR just prior to the start of the Great Northern
service extension to Peterborough in 1987 was that if Peterborough got NSE fares/railcard to go with the NSE trains then Grantham passengers would want NSE fares/railcard as well.
Bizarre logic as to my knowledge NSE trains have never ran a service to Grantham:roll:
Well how does one account for Exeter Central and Worcester being in the Network Card area?
Well how does one account for Exeter Central and Worcester being in the Network Card area?
Exeter Central certainly didn't have trains to London provided by Intercity, what about Worcester? But having said that, this may have been something which has changed over time, as I'm sure I recall Pinhoe being the boundary at some point.
I presume the situation at Peterborough would have been that Intercity would have objected, being the primary operator.
Were there any "NSE only" type fares from Peterborough to London at the time? Certainly my recollection is the NSE Peterborough service was more aimed at users from the intermediate stations rather than people making Peterborough-London journeys.
It doesn't help with capacity today that WAGN/FCC/GN have all offered cheaper fares for Peterborough-London journeys, taking up capacity on their trains to the detriment of users from intermediate stations, whilst the GNER/NXEC/EC/VTEC services often arrive in London with some free seats. Isn't privatisation wonderful?!
Another 2 x RLU entering service Monday 7th August.
The following diagrams currently worked by 8 377 will become 8 700:
(408)
5H15 06+26 Cauldwell to Luton
2V15 06.50 Luton to Sutton
2V16 08.38 Sutton to Bedford
5G16 10+35 Bedford to Bedford (via North Siding)
1W27 11.10 Bedford to Brighton
1W38 14.05 Brighton to Bedford
1H81 16.50 Bedford to Beckenham Junction
1G63 18.30 Beckenham Junction to Bedford
5G63 20+18 Bedford to Bedford CS
(440)
5G79 03+07 Bedford CS to Bedford
1W79 03.20 Bedford to Brighton
1W08 06.19 Brighton to Bedford
2W25 09.24 Bedford to Three Bridges
2W34 11.59 Three Bridges to Bedford
1W41 14.40 Bedford to Brighton
1W82 17.35 Brighton to Bedford
5U82 20+03 Bedford to Cauldwell
Thanks for the info. How many / what diagrams will that leave as 377? I believe I saw 3 maybe 4 pairs of them out last week.
How many / what diagrams will that leave as 377?
... It doesn't help with capacity today that WAGN/FCC/GN have all offered cheaper fares for Peterborough-London journeys, taking up capacity on their trains to the detriment of users from intermediate stations, whilst the GNER/NXEC/EC/VTEC services often arrive in London with some free seats. Isn't privatisation wonderful?!

Exeter Central certainly didn't have trains to London provided by Intercity, what about Worcester? But having said that, this may have been something which has changed over time, as I'm sure I recall Pinhoe being the boundary at some point...
I remember getting as far as Exeter St Davids on one of the Network Days so it must have been at some time.
Milton Keynes also had IC services but NSE tickets were valid on both unles the trains were specifically marked as U or S in the timetable. MK is of course prime commuter territory, - as Peterborough is now or will be soon!
I recall going to Peterborough on a NSE day.