I just can’t believe the railway is so reliant on overtime that without it they can only run 0600 to 1800, with significant parts of the network being closed.
I would have expected an overtime ban to result in something like services be restricted to 06:00 to 22:00 with some of the quieter lines not operating, disruptive yes, but not so much so that it makes the railway essentially useable for most commuters.
I agree. On lines with manual signalboxes, such as the Glasgow & South Western line as I mentioned earlier, being unable to staff even just one box could shut the route. However the same does not apply to signalling centres, staff rostered night shift will surely still be nightshift during the overtime ban and cannot simply be moved off their booked hours? And key panels/workstations can be kept going by reallocating qualified Signallers, if necessary?
This whole episode will be a thick chapter in my book. No doubt i will need to engage lawyers.
I look forward to your book, if you ever get time (and the lawyers' say-so) to write it.....
One of the reasons I retired in 2016 was the excessive overtime (including 7-turn nightshifts with the first and last shifts being 12 hours) needed to keep the job going, and staff reductions putting increasing pressure on those remaining. However, the situation has improved since then, the staffing reduction has been reversed, and the staff shortages, some within and some without management's control, have been addressed (it should be noted that I was not in a signalling role, however). But if the railway really is in such a desperate situation that 24 hour working is only achievable through overtime, NR has allowed its Signaller staffing position to deteriorate way beyond any reasonable or sensible level.
BTW thanks to all those still on the railway, in all roles, who are keeping the service going, despite the many issues.