• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Suggestions for Dawlish avoiding route(s)

Status
Not open for further replies.

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,316
Location
Yorks
Thanks for the info, was a bit difficult resolving some of of the detail on the satellite view. Yes agreed just a bit shortsighted along with the council offices too, looks like a CP order necessary if (when) reopening goes ahead.

Might be easier depending of the tenure of these properties. If they are Council or Housing Association owned, it will probably be easier to relocate them. If they're owner occupied then compulsory purchase might take longer.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Ash Bridge

Established Member
Joined
17 Mar 2014
Messages
4,214
Location
Stockport
Might be easier depending of the tenure of these properties. If they are Council or Housing Association owned, it will probably be easier to relocate them. If they're owner occupied then compulsory purchase might take longer.

Ah yes, see your point. If they are privately owned, with a bit of luck hopefully they will be in favour of the railway reopening:)
 

Sir Felix Pole

Established Member
Joined
21 Oct 2012
Messages
2,163
Location
Wilmslow
Quant Park is a mixture of social and private (bought under 'Right to Buy') so it is a bit messy. It's named, incidentally, after the last railman (and local councillor) to serve there - Frank Quant. The station buildings, platforms and canopies are intact, but it became an upscale b&b and self-catering establishment after restoration in 2008. Earlier this year it was up for sale as a whole, but it is now being sold off in separate lots which further complicates the picture. The West Devon Council offices are half-empty as the 'back-office' functions are now shared with South Hams Council in Totnes. In the longer term I can see a full merger of both councils, or even a unitary authority for Devon, so the offices will probably become redundant.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,316
Location
Yorks
Quant Park is a mixture of social and private (bought under 'Right to Buy') so it is a bit messy. It's named, incidentally, after the last railman (and local councillor) to serve there - Frank Quant. The station buildings, platforms and canopies are intact, but it became an upscale b&b and self-catering establishment after restoration in 2008. Earlier this year it was up for sale as a whole, but it is now being sold off in separate lots which further complicates the picture. The West Devon Council offices are half-empty as the 'back-office' functions are now shared with South Hams Council in Totnes. In the longer term I can see a full merger of both councils, or even a unitary authority for Devon, so the offices will probably become redundant.

Thanks for the information. Sounds like bad news about the sale of the station. The local authority should buy it and rent out the properties until such a time as the station reopens.
 

21C101

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2014
Messages
2,559
Thanks for the information. Sounds like bad news about the sale of the station. The local authority should buy it and rent out the properties until such a time as the station reopens.

And continue renting most of them out after that. At most the reopened station would need a small ticket office.

It will be interesting to see who buys them. I would imagine that the potential reopening would show up in a local authority search now.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,316
Location
Yorks
And continue renting most of them out after that. At most the reopened station would need a small ticket office.

It will be interesting to see who buys them. I would imagine that the potential reopening would show up in a local authority search now.

Indeed. Perhaps the station could support some sort of a buffet as well.
 

Ash Bridge

Established Member
Joined
17 Mar 2014
Messages
4,214
Location
Stockport
And continue renting most of them out after that. At most the reopened station would need a small ticket office.

It will be interesting to see who buys them. I would imagine that the potential reopening would show up in a local authority search now.

Indeed. Perhaps the station could support some sort of a buffet as well.

Maybe we should all club together...;)
 

Ash Bridge

Established Member
Joined
17 Mar 2014
Messages
4,214
Location
Stockport
Just a minute, I foresee a problem deciding a name for such an establishment. Would it be Bullieds Tavern or The 6B maybe?
 

34104

Member
Joined
1 Dec 2011
Messages
64
I think there was a buffet at Tavistock North as befitted a station which was busy up until closure. Not sure what to name it should the station reopen and a buffet is required but Mr Hooper, who was the last station master at Tavistock North, certainly got it spot on when he named the station house [where he lived for many years post 1968] "Beechings Folly".
 

Ash Bridge

Established Member
Joined
17 Mar 2014
Messages
4,214
Location
Stockport
I think there was a buffet at Tavistock North as befitted a station which was busy up until closure. Not sure what to name it should the station reopen and a buffet is required but Mr Hooper, who was the last station master at Tavistock North, certainly got it spot on when he named the station house [where he lived for many years post 1968] "Beechings Folly".

Can't imagine what people like himself must have thought when during the bad winter of 1968/69 7/8 months after the lines closure as a through route, that BR Western Region decided to conveniently reopen the line when it suited them, and send a procession of freight trains via Tavistock, because ofcourse the good old mainline at Dawlish was closed due to the weather conditions, despite BR telling the many protesters against closure that it was an unnecessary duplication<(
 
Last edited:
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
989
Location
Blackpool south Shore
Bere Alston is going to need signalling and pointwork along with a bay platform for the Gunnislake branch, so the obvious place to put a loop is there by reinstating the island platform. How far you extend it towards Tavistock to ensure reliability is the key issue I guess.

A passing loop at Bere Alston would be good. Preferably bidirectional, allowing overtaking, and a down train from Exeter to pass the Gunnislake train using the 'up' platform etc.
Not sure if a bay platform is that essential. (Bere Alston to Gunnislake is only 20 minutes)
Probably preferable for most Gunnislake trains to go to Plymouth as at present.
Coleford Junction to Exeter would need double track, this would improve Barnstaple services, rather than delays / not so popular changes to their timetables.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,316
Location
Yorks
I note that according to the news, we'll be getting £15 billion worth of road building spend.

In this context, the reinstatement costs for the additional route to the West Country via Okehampton seem extremely reasonable.
 

D1009

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2012
Messages
3,166
Location
Stoke Gifford
I note that according to the news, we'll be getting £15 billion worth of road building spend.

In this context, the reinstatement costs for the additional route to the West Country via Okehampton seem extremely reasonable.
As do the costs of building a Dawlish avoiding line.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,088
Location
Redcar
I note that according to the news, we'll be getting £15 billion worth of road building spend.

In this context, the reinstatement costs for the additional route to the West Country via Okehampton seem extremely reasonable.

To be fair that £15bn is spread all over the country not just for one singular project.
 

gareth950

Member
Joined
3 Nov 2013
Messages
1,009
I think the point is that £15 bn can be found in the run up to a general election to improve roads going through marginal constituencies in England (not Scotland or Wales), but what is an arguably more important and urgent infrastructure issue is the need for a diversionary rail route for Dawlish.

All it will take is another succession of severe, ferocious winter storms to cut off the South West by rail again. With climate change that could happen in the next few months rather than decades as before.

When watching the evening news earlier, my first thought when they illustrated the route of the road (the A303?) to be 'improved' in the South West was 'that's right where the Dawlish diversion rail route needs to be built surely?'
So much for David Cameron creating a new 'green' Tory party.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,316
Location
Yorks
To be fair that £15bn is spread all over the country not just for one singular project.

Fair point, although the budget for seven projects in the SouthWest comes to £2bn, which seems to be roughly £300 million each. That would go a fair whack towards the reinstatement costs.
 

21C101

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2014
Messages
2,559
Fair point, although the budget for seven projects in the SouthWest comes to £2bn, which seems to be roughly £300 million each. That would go a fair whack towards the reinstatement costs.

The Stonehenge Tunnel at £1.3 billion would pay for the Okehampton Route three times over on its own.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,316
Location
Yorks
The Stonehenge Tunnel at £1.3 billion would pay for the Okehampton Route three times over on its own.

Quite.

Preserving the world heritage site is important, but surely a decent and resilient railway network for Devon and Cornwall is just as important.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
But what how many would benefit from each?

With the railway, the populations of Okehampton, Tavistock, Crediton, Exeter, Plymouth (and to an extent, probably Launceston as well) all year round, and the population of the whole far South West in times of disruption. Then there are the potential visitors in to the area.
 

21C101

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2014
Messages
2,559
If you just ran a surface level on line dual carriageway past the stones with a Winterbourne Stoke bypass you could do it for about £300m, £1 billion less and pay for both reopening Okehampton and a Dawlish diversion with the money saved.

Even cheaper if you use the stones as flyover supports <D
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,729
With the railway, the populations of Okehampton, Tavistock, Crediton, Exeter, Plymouth (and to an extent, probably Launceston as well) all year round, and the population of the whole far South West in times of disruption. Then there are the potential visitors in to the area.

The whole population of each of those places doesn't benefit, just those who use the trains and or benefit indirectly through the multiplier effect. It is not the whole population or anything close to it. And some will benefit more than others.

Meanwhile on the A303, every single person who uses it (and I think there is something like 40,000 vehicles every day past Stonehenge) will benefit to the tune of quicker journeys and lower fuel consumption. Speaking very personally, I never consider going to Devon or Cornwall for a holiday as the traffic is so bad en route, with Stonehenge at #1 on that list. With that sorted I may well reconsider.

I would be willing to bet that if you surveyed the population of Exeter, Plymouth, Crediton, Okehampton and Launceston what they would rather have; an improved A303 or a second rail route from Plymouth to Exeter, a very significant majority would pick the former. You'll be hard pressed to find someone in Devon who hasn't been stuck in A303 traffic.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top