• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Storm Goretti disruption - 8/9 January 2026

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
17,150
It looks like storm Goretti may cause some disruption tomorrow and Friday.
I'm hearing Northern have already cancelled some services to Hadfield, Buxton and along the Hope Valley from 18.00 tomorrow.
Think I'm right in saying that it's actually going to be slightly earlier than that, as the final Manchester Piccadilly to Hadfield train still running tonight looks to be the 1633 departure (as the 1703 to Hadfield and all those thereafter are now cancelled).

Similarly, the last Manchester Piccadilly to Buxton train is at 1651 (as the 1721 to Buxton + all those thereafter are now cancelled).
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

scrapy

Established Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
2,299
Think I'm right in saying that it's actually going to be slightly earlier than that, as the final Manchester Piccadilly to Hadfield train still running tonight looks to be the 1633 departure (as the 1703 to Hadfield and all those thereafter are now cancelled).

Similarly, the last Manchester Piccadilly to Buxton train is at 1651 (as the 1721 to Buxton + all those thereafter are now cancelled).
The final Piccadilly to Hadfield train is back clear of the line by 1800 when it closes, similarly the Buxtons will be clear of the line by 1800. If the 17.03 Hadfield or 17.21 Buxtons ran they would not be clear of the line when it (and the signalboxes) close. The 17.03 wouldn't leave Dintings boxes control on its return journey until about 18.06, although admittedly it could be run back empty from Hadfield and be there before 18.00.

It is badly worded and should say trains start to.wind down after 16.30 to give clarification I know.
 
Last edited:

Northerngirl

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2023
Messages
481
Location
Wirral
Is there anything concrete for the s&c tomorrow, im supposed to be on the 10am out of Preston, but by the sounds of it a bit of rain is too much for our infrastructure
 

nilvaj395

Member
Joined
11 Oct 2025
Messages
217
Location
Is there not a difference between the Hope Valley and the Netherlands, or are we ignoring the concept of three dimensional space?
I mean that should mean we should be even more extra prepared to deal with it than they are, but we will never will be because funding and can't be bothered attitude of those in charge.

If we stopped running everything the second there was a slight risk, we wouldn't have a functioning rail network at all. We can't run Settle to Carlisle or the WCML through the Lakes because there is a small chance something might go wrong requiring a rescue etc? That's just the nature of running a public transport network you have to be prepared for.

As someone who has seen people stump up expensive prices for taxis the minute rail service has a slight hiccup despite them already paying an arm and a leg for a season ticket, you're turning away anyone who has the luxury of being able to drive, much to the misery of those who can't in higher fares and less bother being given to their journeys.

As the other poster said, those in society who rely more so on public transport as a requirement and have no alternative are those in jobs who won't be forgiving if they are absent. Some employers (especially if they are not in the warning area) would be quick to dismiss a day's pay or worse for someone being unable to turn up due to the trains giving up. Doing this over such a long period of time will push people to the seemingly much more reliable (even if it has it's own problems and costs) form of driving as soon as they can, not just for journeys when the weather is bad, but for every journey. That's the railway losing another paying customer it has to make up for and try to claw back.

The weather event on Wednesday affecting the Netherlands was classed as a Code Orange (or Yellow in the more hilly Limburg regions) for the entire day but everything still ran at a reduced 2 per hour at minimum or at least once they overcame the IT outage and started to run from 10am (the weather warning started at 6am). I did see the other post about trains not running in the Amsterdam region but it seems as soon as they could get it open again they did. This was not due to the threat of the weather but rather switch failures caused by it, arguably a point against NS / ProRail where they could improve in the future by installing more heated switches.
 
Last edited:

Fokx

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2019
Messages
1,590
Location
Liverpool
The below is the guidance from Transpennine Express:

Re-routing via Leeds is permitted

What should I do?

Due to the forecast given, you cannot travel between Manchester Piccadilly and Sheffield in both directions after 18:00 on Thursday 8th January, and all day on Friday 9th January because there will be no trains running and no replacement buses.

If your ticket is dated for travel on Thursday 8th January or Friday 9th January, you may instead use it on any TransPennine Express service on:

  • Thursday 8th January (before 18:00), or
  • Saturday 10th January, or
  • Sunday 11th January
We have also arranged for you to use your TransPennine Express ticket to travel on East Midlands Railway and Northern services between Manchester and Sheffield, in both directions, at no extra cost on Thursday 8th January until 18:00.


While this disruption is ongoing, you may use your ticket at no extra cost on the following alternative routes, in either direction, from 16:00 on 08/01/26 -

  • From Manchester Piccadilly you can use your ticket to travel on any alternative TransPennine Express service towards Huddersfield, Leeds and York
  • LNER services between York/Leeds and Doncaster
  • CrossCountry services between York and Doncaster
  • Northern services Huddersfield/Leeds and Sheffield
  • Northern services from Leeds and Doncaster

Please note that these alternative routes are likely to be busy and may experience overcrowding.

We are also strongly recommending customers to check their journey before they travel for all other routes across the network.

Alternatively, if the train you intended to travel on is cancelled or you are unable to complete your journey then you can apply for a fee free refund from your point of purchase.

We apologise for any inconvenience caused to your journey
 

TPO

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2018
Messages
401
Here we go again, Northern and TPE throwing in the towel at the mere possibility of severe weather. According to the current Met Office forecast, Edale (normally the worst affected station) can expect light snow overnight Thursday then a mainly dry albeit cold day on Friday. Hardly extreme weather!

Depends on which forecast you look at. If you subscribe to Windy.com, you can run all the main models- ECMWF, Met Office, GFS, Arome, Icon etc. The more they agree, the higher the likelihood that conditions will be as forecast.... as they all represent different models.

Whereas if the models don't agree, it indicates that the conditions are very difficult and dynamic, and so the outcome could be very different. They are not in agreement betwene rain or snow at the moment.

If you watch the Met Office Deep Dives on you-tube, they often explain the different model run results and the probability of each one being "the one" which happens.

Network Rail have access to detailed forcasts from multiple models and the probabilities. They will then make decisions which reflect both the probabilities of the weather and the potential consequence. In the light of recent cases (e.g. Carmont) and the general intolerance of the public to anything not resembling perfection, it's not surprising if they err on the more cautions side of the options. Certainly they would be castigated (and possibly individuals prosecuted) if the aftermath of an incident they did not......


The thing is, though, that trains will run. You can guarantee freight will run, possibly with diversions in place.

The reality is that, time and again, this approach taken by TOCs is less about safety and more about the inconvenience of trying to move people when the advertised timetable can't be delivered, reflecting the operational inflexibility of the railway in 2025 (eg: incompatible coupling of rolling stock, limited crew route knowledge restricting options to divert, overly rigid unit plans giving little scope to recover the following days schedule if units are out of place).

Employers wouldn't expect people not to turn in because of an amber weather warning, the railway shouldn't use this as an excuse to stop delivering.

Not necesssarily...... you cannot guarantee freight will run..... FOCs will also be making arrangements to change/reschedule services in line with the weather.

No, that’s not what it means. From the Met Office:



The last 6 words being key.

Weather warnings such as this by their nature have to cover a wide area, and can’t deal with the intircacies of very local affects.

The weather forecast supplied to the Railway today shows potentially 30-40cm of snow, locally, in the area of the Hope Valley line between 1200 tomorrow and 0600 Friday, with most of that falling overnight. This is the worst weather in the whole country, equalled only by parts of mid-Wales. Clearly the forecast could be wrong. But given that is the best forecast available, from the professionals; it is wise to take heed.

Indeed, as I indicate above, forecasting is an inexact thing and the specific boundaries between what falls as rain or snow is a particular challenge as it's effected by so many variables.

I'd put money on my Tesco and Amazon order still turning up tomorrow!

I wouldn't be so sure. We had a dump of snow last week, 4 inches or so. Amazon and Royal Mail gave up until the road was finally gritted and clear- yesterday. Refuse collection ditto. Couldn't get up the hill without 4x4 and winter tyres until Tuesday so no, Tesco wouldn't have been out either.

I don't think you understand the nature of the Hope Valley. Once the roads close they are closed, snow chains or otherwise.

Snake Pass (A57) was closed yesterday by Derbyshire Police due to (separate) poor weather conditions.

Indeed. Once the snow is more than about 6 inches or so, you are not getting through without ploughing (or in a tractor). If there is also wind and the snow drifts- not a chance until the plough has cleared the drifts.

In the north Pennines in the 1980's, drifting snow was regular, so there was a fleet of snow ploughs (including some big v-shovel jobs) and snow blowers which went out to clear the roads. Along the side of the road were black and which striped poles a couple of metres high- these were to assist clearing the roads in winter- helped the clearance crews know they were clearign in the correct place becasue in drifting snow it can be difficult.

I was just listening to a meteorological expert on the radio and they were quite clear that predicting snowfall when rain hits cold fronts (as in this case) is such an inexact science, even a few hours beforehand, that people in the Potteries could wake up to a foot of snow tomorrow, a big pile of slush., or anything in between.

Around this time last year (when we had a decent dumping of snow here in North Yorkshire) I remember a Met Office bod saying quite candidly that anyone who predicts heavy snow in low-lying areas with 100% certainty more than 24 hours ahead is simply guessing.

Indeed, the Met Office Deep Dive on You-tube yesterday was saying the same thing, explaining how the weather system will cross over between the warm and cold sides of the jet stream and the warm and cold air wrap around each other making the end result extremely unpredictable, especailly as in these conditions, 1 or 2 degrees Celcius is the difference between rain or snow falling.

Such is life.

TPO
 

SteveHFC

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2014
Messages
262
Red weather warning issued at 13:58 for Cornwall and Isles of Scilly for wind between 16:00 and 23:00.
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,930
Location
Ely
Red weather warning issued at 13:58 for Cornwall and Isles of Scilly for wind between 16:00 and 23:00.

Fairly obvious that was going to happen last night. Seems odd to me that they concentrated on closing lines related to rather unpredictable snowfall significantly earlier than they decided to close Cornwall, when the latter was clearly more dangerous,
 

sheff1

Established Member
Joined
24 Dec 2009
Messages
6,059
Location
Sheffield
Is there not a difference between the Hope Valley and the Netherlands, or are we ignoring the concept of three dimensional space?
Snow being forecast for the Hope Valley during winter is normal. Snow being forecast in the Netherlands during the winter is normal.

Communications here are referring to “extreme weather”, there to “winter weather”.

The below is the guidance from Transpennine Express:

Re-routing via Leeds is permitted
Good. Pity EMR make no mention of that.
 

James H

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2014
Messages
1,530
I have a ticket for the 2135 from Waterloo to Bournemouth which as it stands is the final train (and is cancelled beyond Bournemouth)

Tempted to travel earlier if possible to reduce risk of being stuck, but SWR has just told someone else who asked on X that there's no flexibility unless your train has been cancelled.
 

CaptainHaddock

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,708
So you'd be happy to put staff and passengers at risk with a red weather warning out then? I have to say this is a very strange attitude.
Look at his location and stop overreacting, there isn't a red weather warning for London!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
112,941
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
So you'd be happy to put staff and passengers at risk with a red weather warning out then? I have to say this is a very strange attitude.

I think it is fair to withdraw service in case of a red warning (and only a red warning) on a blanket and automatic basis.

A yellow warning means you need your big coat. Nothing should be withdrawn if that is all there is in a given area.
 

liamf656

Established Member
Joined
2 Aug 2020
Messages
1,691
Location
Derby
Oh no. More excuses for trains not to train again.
This gets done to death every time the railway takes precautionary measures for anything. If they do people complain, if they don't and people get stranded, people complain!!!
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
3,395
Look at his location and stop overreacting, there isn't a red weather warning for London!
But the final destination of many of the trains is in a weather warning area. Trees will be down. It's not an unreasonable attitude to minimise the risks to the drivers surely?
 

liamf656

Established Member
Joined
2 Aug 2020
Messages
1,691
Location
Derby
I think it is fair to withdraw service in case of a red warning (and only a red warning) on a blanket and automatic basis.

A yellow warning means you need your big coat. Nothing should be withdrawn if that is all there is in a given area.
If the forecast said it were snowing without a weather warning, then yes I'll wear my big coat. However the Met Office themselves say:

What should I expect?
Travel delays on roads are likely, stranding some vehicles and passengers
Some delays and cancellations to rail and air travel are likely
There is a good chance that some rural communities could become cut off
Power cuts are likely and other services, such as mobile phone coverage, may be affected

It's better to be safe than sorry. If the trains still ran, people would still try and travel, then complain that they're stuck onboard for hours. If you take away the trains, you take away the risk of people getting stranded
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
3,395
I think it is fair to withdraw service in case of a red warning (and only a red warning) on a blanket and automatic basis.

A yellow warning means you need your big coat. Nothing should be withdrawn if that is all there is in a given area.
Yellow weather warnings are too wishy washy. You need to look at the risk matrix, yellow can equally be high impact low probability or low impact high probability.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
112,941
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Yellow weather warnings are too wishy washy. You need to look at the risk matrix, yellow can equally be high impact low probability or low impact high probability.

Low impact high probability is just a bad weather forecast. That should not be subject to any kind of warning.

If yellow was just "high impact low probability" that might work better, though because most people see yellow and amber as the same colour perhaps it should be called something else, or switch to yellow-orange-red.
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
3,395
If the forecast said it were snowing without a weather warning, then yes I'll wear my big coat. However the Met Office themselves say:



It's better to be safe than sorry. If the trains still ran, people would still try and travel, then complain that they're stuck onboard for hours. If you take away the trains, you take away the risk of people getting stranded
I'm sure the snow incident at Ashurst New Forest a while back still sits on the mind of railway planners, and helps to inform their decision making.
 

coach fan

On Moderation
Joined
7 Nov 2025
Messages
105
This gets done to death every time the railway takes precautionary measures for anything. If they do people complain, if they don't and people get stranded, people complain!!!
Nope. That’s why the majority of people in this country drive. Far far more reliable and probably cheaper too in the long run.
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,930
Location
Ely
I think it is fair to withdraw service in case of a red warning (and only a red warning) on a blanket and automatic basis.

A yellow warning means you need your big coat. Nothing should be withdrawn if that is all there is in a given area.

Agreed. It is easy to say this from the comfort of my chair at home, but I don't understand why the message wasn't put out last night that Cornwall would be closed this evening (as a red was pretty inevitable given the wide agreement across the weather models of the wind speeds), and conversely that while services across the Pennines 'will be likely to be disrupted or eventually stopped' it was very premature to put out a blanket withdrawal. It's been done the wrong way around, and I'm no expert but that was pretty obvious to me yesterday evening.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
112,941
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I'm sure the snow incident at Ashurst New Forest a while back still sits on the mind of railway planners, and helps to inform their decision making.

That was a non-incident. Some people chose to remain on a train they had the opportunity to leave and go to local hospitality businesses instead if they wanted, or to walk to their destination. They chose to sleep on board the train as it was the better option. Nobody was in serious danger at any point.
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
3,395
Low impact high probability is just a bad weather forecast. That should not be subject to any kind of warning.

If yellow was just "high impact low probability" that might work better, though because most people see yellow and amber as the same colour perhaps it should be called something else, or switch to yellow-orange-red.
Agreed, there needs to be further banding of weather warnings. 3 levels isn't enough. Or perhaps have the lower levels of yellow rebranded as a "weather watch"

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Nope. That’s why the majority of people in this country drive. Far far more reliable and probably cheaper too in the long run.
Good luck on the roads tonight.
 

CaptainHaddock

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,708
Agreed, there needs to be further banding of weather warnings. 3 levels isn't enough. Or perhaps have the lower levels of yellow rebranded as a "weather watch"

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

No, there needs to be just one; a "danger to life" one , the equivalent of the current red weather warning. Scrap the yellow and amber ones. As for adding further levels that would only create even more confusion!
 

BAFRA77

Member
Joined
5 Jul 2023
Messages
264
Location
Worcester
More detail added to WMR's page:

https://www.westmidlandsrailway.co.uk/StormGoretti

Thursday 8th January
  • Birmingham New Street </> Hereford - Services suspended from 14:40

  • Four Oaks </> Redditch - Services suspended from 19:00

  • Lichfield Trent Valley </> Bromsgrove - Reduced service from 18:00

  • Birmingham New Street </> Shrewsbury - Reduced service from 19:00

  • Walsall </> Wolverhampton - Reduced service from 19:00

  • Kidderminster </> Whitlocks End - Reduced service from 18:00

  • Worcester Foregate Street </> Dorridge - Reduced service from 18:00

  • Worcester Foregate Street </> Stratford-upon-Avon - Reduced service from 19:00
 

Freemo

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
94
Location
Sheffield
As someone who has seen people stump up expensive prices for taxis the minute rail service has a slight hiccup despite them already paying an arm and a leg for a season ticket, you're turning away anyone who has the luxury of being able to drive, much to the misery of those who can't in higher fares and less bother being given to their journeys.
But you literally won't be able to drive across the Pennines between Manchester and Sheffield, you'll have to divert around. Which is exactly what you'll have to do to get there by train.
 

Bishopstone

Established Member
Joined
24 Jun 2010
Messages
1,685
Location
Seaford
I’m going to decide tomorrow afternoon whether the railway is taking wise precautions, or overreacting. I will let everyone know. With my A-level in geography, I’m quite an expert in these decisions.
 

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,445
That was a non-incident. Some people chose to remain on a train they had the opportunity to leave and go to local hospitality businesses instead if they wanted, or to walk to their destination. They chose to sleep on board the train as it was the better option. Nobody was in serious danger at any point.

I’m sorry but that’s utter nonsense. Three trains got stranded as they couldn’t draw power from the 3rd rail. None were anywhere near stations and road access was impossible. Traincrew and passengers were stranded overnight with at least one unit losing hotel power as well. It certainly was not a non-incident and should be avoided going forward. From memory a cross country unit was used running wrong direction and did a side to side evacuation.
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
3,395
No, there needs to be just one; a "danger to life" one , the equivalent of the current red weather warning. Scrap the yellow and amber ones. As for adding further levels that would only create even more confusion!
Depends what you're doing. The yellow wind warning, for example, has little relevance if you live in the middle of a city, but is of far more concern if you're on the coast.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top