Page 10-ish of the thread "Places on existing lines where new stations could be built" began to wander into tangent territory along the subject of stations which might be candidates for closure.
So to take that tangent and run with it, this off-shoot asks for nominations and justifications for stations which are feasible candidates for removing from the network.
Here's some of the quotes from that original thread as a starting point.
So to take that tangent and run with it, this off-shoot asks for nominations and justifications for stations which are feasible candidates for removing from the network.
Here's some of the quotes from that original thread as a starting point.
Then change that bit. Realistically, no one other than enthusiasts would notice if Shippea Hill were to close. Is there any particular reason why it didn't close in the 60s?
Shippea Hill is an extreme example, but there are hundreds of lightly used stations which are in the middle of nowhere (in many cases, not even in the small village which they notionally serve). Closing all of these stations wouldn't save a huge amount of money, but it would enable a fair number of services to be a bit faster.
Surely we need to get rid of the dead wood before we start thinking about new wood.
They can get rid of half the stations on the Coastway West for starters. 1h40 to do 45 miles from Portsmouth to Brighton!
