I was actually talking about the scenario where the railway returns some pittance when the return journey was cancelled. I absolutely agree that there is no cause for action hereDon’t be ridiculous. The OP has received a refund, which I had stated was due. My comment was about the words being used and not the outcome.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Sadly so. With some companies it seems that is the only thing that attracts serious attention.I think we can all agree that, in general, litigation against a train company is much, much, more likely to get you what you actually want than a lengthy process of backwards and forwards attempting to get them to accept being wrong voluntarily.