Nor would you get them slapping you for going too fast...in the real world you wouldn't get police stopping motorists and presenting them with gifts for driving within the speed limit.
Nor would you get them slapping you for going too fast...in the real world you wouldn't get police stopping motorists and presenting them with gifts for driving within the speed limit.
I'm not really sure what you're trying to say. I can only conclude that you're either jealous of today's kids or seem to think that child abuse is a genuinely good thing for society?
There's no evidence that smacking improves behaviour, and quite frankly it seems like some people here just like "what's obvious" (i.e. what they like doing) rather than care about what actually works.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
What do you actually want out of this? Are you really arguing that fear and punishment are the best ways to run classrooms?
The best teachers always engage with their kids and try and understand them. If the only way you can deal with them is by physically hitting them then frankly you're just a bully.
For goodness sake this is an online forum, not a court of law. You don't have to provide evidence to express an opinion.
Maybe the UK press are just reflecting public opinion?
I suppose you haven't noticed the escalation in child violence, mostly against other kids, since corporal punishment was abolished?:roll:
Fear of punishment is how life works, most adults don't break the law for fear of arrest prosecution and maybe imprisonment.
Engaging with kids is fine up to point.
Your final sentence is just ridiculous!
Like I said this isn't a court of law and anybody who doesn't think child behaviour has got worse clearly has their head in a sandpit.
And as for this pathetic notion that smacking is violence.............it is just a quick effective punishment that hurts for a few minutes but does no lasting damage unlike bullying which has driven some children to suicide. We had an excellent anti bullying scheme at my school............the headmasters cane!
Fear of punishment is how life works, most adults don't break the law for fear of arrest prosecution and maybe imprisonment.
What if they have tried engaging , tried discouraging verbally and tried any other non violent method or resolving the child's behavior but it still seems hell bent on bullying other kids ? .The best teachers always engage with their kids and try and understand them. If the only way you can deal with them is by physically hitting them then frankly you're just a bully.
Only because there are far fewer of them.But, the public opinion is wrong. There is an opinion that a majority of crime is perpetrated by 'youths' when in fact Police statistics show that it is much, much less than that done by adults.
You know, I think you're right. I saw two kids fighting outside a shop this afternoon, therefore they probably aren't being smacked hard enough by their parents. In fact we should bring back public caning in schools to keep the others in their place too, and these little brats can be the first in line! I'm just going to ignore all the countless other afternoons that there has been no problem, as this clearly shows that child discipline is worse than ever.Antman said:Like I said this isn't a court of law and anybody who doesn't think child behaviour has got worse clearly has their head in a sandpit.
But, the public opinion is wrong. There is an opinion that a majority of crime is perpetrated by 'youths' when in fact Police statistics show that it is much, much less than that done by adults.
I dont have the statistics currently, but I can get them if you so wish?
In the mid '90s I spent two years teaching Physics in a secondary school overseas. Corporal punishment was still permitted. Having watched it being doled out quickly made me realise how utterly pointless it was. Pretty much every kid smirked when it was being done and would go back to their class cockier than ever.
I've now got an 11-year-old son. I've never smacked him. I will admit that there have been times that I wanted to and I'll also admit that every single one of those times was because I was frustrated and to have hit him would have been wholly unfair on him.
Was I smacked as a kid? Yes. Only twice that I can remember and those were for setting fire to things in the house [I was and remain fascinated with fire]. Did it have any effect? No. After I'd been caught for the third time setting fire to things, my parents came up with an effective treatment. They let me make supervised fires.
Public opinion is wrong? Sorry to state the obvious but it is neither right nor wrong it is what it says...........public opinion!
As for stats, what's the old saying about they can prove just about anything you want them to prove? I'd rather go by real life experiences.
Your real life experiences are small enough to be insignificant without backing. How do I know you're not lying out your backside especially if it gets you a favourable outcome?
I beg your pardon?
You stated "I'd rather go by real life experiences.". I was pointing out that your view is insignificant from a statistical point of view just as one accident does not make a motorway unsafe
Tony Mac gave a good explanation as to why quoting stats is pointless
Do you have any idea of the level of damage you would need to do to make any fifteen year-old male cry with pain in front of his mates*? To make someone of that age cry not in a school setting, you would be rightly be taken to court for ABH.Walked away smirking? Nobody did at my school after visiting the headmasters office for six of the best, even the meanest nastiest school bully left his office in tears having been given a dose of their own medicine. I don't suppose any of the bullied again. Sadly I don't think I nice cosy chat with tea and biscuits would have been as effective?
Do you have any idea of the level of damage you would need to do to make any fifteen year-old male cry with pain in front of his mates*? To make someone of that age cry not in a school setting, you would be rightly be taken to court for ABH.
*Some kids would, but they are also probably the least likely to be getting corporal punishment.
FWIW, I am old enough that corporal punishment was still used when I was at school. I remember one boy being hauled on stage in primary school, shorts pulled down and caned in front of the whole school.
I was bullied. Did corporal punishment have any effect on the bullies? Not a jot. They wore it as a badge of honour.
There were plenty of bullies in the 40s, 50s and 60s, just as there are now. Plenty of sadistic teachers too. Go read what Roald Dahl, for instance, thought about the use of corporal punishment at his school.
If a parent can only control their child with violence then they are a bad parent. If a teacher can only control a class with violence than they are a bad teacher. It really is that simple.
Confiscate his phone?
"Give me your phone or you'll be suspended" worked pretty well when I was at school (not very long ago).Wouldn't you have to make physical contact to confiscate his phone thereby putting yourself at risk of being arrested for assault ?
Poor parenting accounts for some bad behaviour. Agreed nobody writes the book and most have rarely enjoyed perfect parenting but it has to be said that lack of authority, love and safety account for poor behaviour.
This generation seems to ignore the fact that it has liberalised education and the family unit to its peril.
"Give me your phone or you'll be suspended" worked pretty well when I was at school (not very long ago).
"Give me your phone or you'll be suspended" worked pretty well when I was at school (not very long ago).
"Give me your phone or you'll be suspended" worked pretty well when I was at school (not very long ago).
Tony Mac gave a good explanation as to why quoting stats is pointless
Fear of punishment is how life works, most adults don't break the law for fear of arrest prosecution and maybe imprisonment.
Engaging with kids is fine up to point.
Your final sentence is just ridiculous!
Confiscate his phone?