• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

smacking

Status
Not open for further replies.

Oswyntail

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
4,183
Location
Yorkshire
...in the real world you wouldn't get police stopping motorists and presenting them with gifts for driving within the speed limit.
Nor would you get them slapping you for going too fast :lol:. But you are confusing the treatments of two different groups. Adults are presumed to know what they are meant to be doing, and are not learning this day by day, so do not require anything other than a punishment when they contravene the rules. Children are still learning, and do require the positive reinforcement that you seem to dismiss. Of course it has to be applied such that it does promote good behaviour and not, as you imply, simply stimulate bad behaviour.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
I'm not really sure what you're trying to say. I can only conclude that you're either jealous of today's kids or seem to think that child abuse is a genuinely good thing for society?

There's no evidence that smacking improves behaviour, and quite frankly it seems like some people here just like "what's obvious" (i.e. what they like doing) rather than care about what actually works.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---


What do you actually want out of this? Are you really arguing that fear and punishment are the best ways to run classrooms?

The best teachers always engage with their kids and try and understand them. If the only way you can deal with them is by physically hitting them then frankly you're just a bully.

Fear of punishment is how life works, most adults don't break the law for fear of arrest prosecution and maybe imprisonment.

Engaging with kids is fine up to point.

Your final sentence is just ridiculous!
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,210
Location
UK
For goodness sake this is an online forum, not a court of law. You don't have to provide evidence to express an opinion.

Maybe the UK press are just reflecting public opinion?

I suppose you haven't noticed the escalation in child violence, mostly against other kids, since corporal punishment was abolished?:roll:

But, the public opinion is wrong. There is an opinion that a majority of crime is perpetrated by 'youths' when in fact Police statistics show that it is much, much less than that done by adults.

I dont have the statistics currently, but I can get them if you so wish?
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,069
Location
Redcar
Fear of punishment is how life works, most adults don't break the law for fear of arrest prosecution and maybe imprisonment.

This is true but the punishment isn't being physically beaten. It would be things like imprisonment (similar to detention?) or being fined (could be equated with losing access to a phone or TV). So why is it not acceptable to hit adults but as soon as it's kids that is the best punishment? Or are you an equal opportunity beater? :lol:

Engaging with kids is fine up to point.

Would that point be when they say 'you're wrong'?

Your final sentence is just ridiculous!

The teachers that screamed and shouted at us when I was school were ridiculed behind their backs and hated. No one really gave two hoots about their lessons. The teachers that actively tried to engage with us rather than just shouting tended to get rather good results. When it didn't they simply used available punishments (detention) instead.

I do not see how being allowed to hit any of us would have improved the situation.
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,210
Location
UK
Like I said this isn't a court of law and anybody who doesn't think child behaviour has got worse clearly has their head in a sandpit.

And as for this pathetic notion that smacking is violence.............it is just a quick effective punishment that hurts for a few minutes but does no lasting damage unlike bullying which has driven some children to suicide. We had an excellent anti bullying scheme at my school............the headmasters cane!

I see you still have not provided any statistical evidence to support what you 'think'. Perhaps the reason you think this is because you didnt read and remember every incident in the papers as a child, and therefore are comparing your personal experiences, at your school, at the small amount of time you were there, against everything from every school in the Uk over the last decade?

And if apparently smacking isnt violence, go on, next time you see a police officer smack him, and see what happens...
 

muz379

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2014
Messages
2,500
Fear of punishment is how life works, most adults don't break the law for fear of arrest prosecution and maybe imprisonment.

I think that is true for certain things . For example there is a road on my drive to work that it would be safe for people to drive at 40MPH on however the speed limit is only 30MPH . Because I fear getting points on my license and a fine I drive at 30MPH on this road .

However take other more serious crimes . I dont commit acts of rape or murder because I am scared of going to prison I refrain from those offenses because they are morally wrong .Even with less serious crimes like Theft or Fraud . I dont refrain from committing those crimes through fear of punishment . Its because I myself am not that way inclined .

The best teachers always engage with their kids and try and understand them. If the only way you can deal with them is by physically hitting them then frankly you're just a bully.
What if they have tried engaging , tried discouraging verbally and tried any other non violent method or resolving the child's behavior but it still seems hell bent on bullying other kids ? .

I think what Antman is trying to say is that sometimes things will get to an extreme scenario where a short sharp shock and a taste of their own medicine is what they may need . I dont think for one minute what he is proposing is that any time a child steps even slightly out of line they be beaten severely with a cane until they tow the line 110% of the way all of the time . Obviously things like engaging and understanding and listening and communicating verbally with children are also important tools to control their behavior .

Just for the record BTW I dont think that schools should be able to discipline children using physical punishment because I think that kind of punishment should be wholly down to parental choice and I would not want the school making that decision and forcing it on a parent who strongly objected to their children being smacked. I however knew when I was at school that if the teachers had told my Parents that I had been involved in bullying I would have got a severe telling off , maybe a smack on the bottom and sent to bed early with no TV time and no toys etc .
 
Last edited:

cb a1

Member
Joined
9 Mar 2015
Messages
455
In the mid '90s I spent two years teaching Physics in a secondary school overseas. Corporal punishment was still permitted. Having watched it being doled out quickly made me realise how utterly pointless it was. Pretty much every kid smirked when it was being done and would go back to their class cockier than ever.

I've now got an 11-year-old son. I've never smacked him. I will admit that there have been times that I wanted to and I'll also admit that every single one of those times was because I was frustrated and to have hit him would have been wholly unfair on him.

Was I smacked as a kid? Yes. Only twice that I can remember and those were for setting fire to things in the house [I was and remain fascinated with fire]. Did it have any effect? No. After I'd been caught for the third time setting fire to things, my parents came up with an effective treatment. They let me make supervised fires.
 

tony_mac

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2009
Messages
3,626
Location
Liverpool
But, the public opinion is wrong. There is an opinion that a majority of crime is perpetrated by 'youths' when in fact Police statistics show that it is much, much less than that done by adults.
Only because there are far fewer of them.
10-17 year olds make up 10% of the population, but commit 23% of the crimes.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/167982/horr64.pdf
The age at which offending peaks is 17.
http://www.poverty.org.uk/28/index.shtml
 

NSEFAN

Established Member
Joined
17 Jun 2007
Messages
3,518
Location
Southampton
Antman said:
Like I said this isn't a court of law and anybody who doesn't think child behaviour has got worse clearly has their head in a sandpit.
You know, I think you're right. I saw two kids fighting outside a shop this afternoon, therefore they probably aren't being smacked hard enough by their parents. In fact we should bring back public caning in schools to keep the others in their place too, and these little brats can be the first in line! I'm just going to ignore all the countless other afternoons that there has been no problem, as this clearly shows that child discipline is worse than ever.

That seems to be your train of thought. Please correct me if I am wrong. This is indeed not a law court but that doesn't make it at all sane to have such low standards of evidence when forming opinions.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
But, the public opinion is wrong. There is an opinion that a majority of crime is perpetrated by 'youths' when in fact Police statistics show that it is much, much less than that done by adults.

I dont have the statistics currently, but I can get them if you so wish?

Public opinion is wrong? Sorry to state the obvious but it is neither right nor wrong it is what it says...........public opinion!

As for stats, what's the old saying about they can prove just about anything you want them to prove? I'd rather go by real life experiences.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
In the mid '90s I spent two years teaching Physics in a secondary school overseas. Corporal punishment was still permitted. Having watched it being doled out quickly made me realise how utterly pointless it was. Pretty much every kid smirked when it was being done and would go back to their class cockier than ever.

I've now got an 11-year-old son. I've never smacked him. I will admit that there have been times that I wanted to and I'll also admit that every single one of those times was because I was frustrated and to have hit him would have been wholly unfair on him.

Was I smacked as a kid? Yes. Only twice that I can remember and those were for setting fire to things in the house [I was and remain fascinated with fire]. Did it have any effect? No. After I'd been caught for the third time setting fire to things, my parents came up with an effective treatment. They let me make supervised fires.

Walked away smirking? Nobody did at my school after visiting the headmasters office for six of the best, even the meanest nastiest school bully left his office in tears having been given a dose of their own medicine. I don't suppose any of the bullied again. Sadly I don't think I nice cosy chat with tea and biscuits would have been as effective?
 

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
Public opinion is wrong? Sorry to state the obvious but it is neither right nor wrong it is what it says...........public opinion!

As for stats, what's the old saying about they can prove just about anything you want them to prove? I'd rather go by real life experiences.

Your real life experiences are small enough to be insignificant without backing. How do I know you're not lying out your backside especially if it gets you a favourable outcome?
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
Your real life experiences are small enough to be insignificant without backing. How do I know you're not lying out your backside especially if it gets you a favourable outcome?

I beg your pardon?
 

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
I beg your pardon?

You stated "I'd rather go by real life experiences.". I was pointing out that your view is insignificant from a statistical point of view just as one accident does not make a motorway unsafe
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
You stated "I'd rather go by real life experiences.". I was pointing out that your view is insignificant from a statistical point of view just as one accident does not make a motorway unsafe

Tony Mac gave a good explanation as to why quoting stats is pointless
 

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
Tony Mac gave a good explanation as to why quoting stats is pointless

Quoting stats is not always pointless. A small sample size skews results which is what I was saying about your experiences (they may not be indicative of a general case).
 

cb a1

Member
Joined
9 Mar 2015
Messages
455
Walked away smirking? Nobody did at my school after visiting the headmasters office for six of the best, even the meanest nastiest school bully left his office in tears having been given a dose of their own medicine. I don't suppose any of the bullied again. Sadly I don't think I nice cosy chat with tea and biscuits would have been as effective?
Do you have any idea of the level of damage you would need to do to make any fifteen year-old male cry with pain in front of his mates*? To make someone of that age cry not in a school setting, you would be rightly be taken to court for ABH.

*Some kids would, but they are also probably the least likely to be getting corporal punishment.

FWIW, I am old enough that corporal punishment was still used when I was at school. I remember one boy being hauled on stage in primary school, shorts pulled down and caned in front of the whole school.

I was bullied. Did corporal punishment have any effect on the bullies? Not a jot. They wore it as a badge of honour.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
Do you have any idea of the level of damage you would need to do to make any fifteen year-old male cry with pain in front of his mates*? To make someone of that age cry not in a school setting, you would be rightly be taken to court for ABH.

*Some kids would, but they are also probably the least likely to be getting corporal punishment.

FWIW, I am old enough that corporal punishment was still used when I was at school. I remember one boy being hauled on stage in primary school, shorts pulled down and caned in front of the whole school.

I was bullied. Did corporal punishment have any effect on the bullies? Not a jot. They wore it as a badge of honour.

Well it did stop bullying at my school, oh it might have been a badge of honour but nobody went back for second helpings.

It would have been carried out in the headmasters office though not on the stage in front of everyone.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,446
Location
Isle of Man
There were plenty of bullies in the 40s, 50s and 60s, just as there are now. Plenty of sadistic teachers too. Go read what Roald Dahl, for instance, thought about the use of corporal punishment at his school.

If a parent can only control their child with violence then they are a bad parent. If a teacher can only control a class with violence than they are a bad teacher. It really is that simple.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
There were plenty of bullies in the 40s, 50s and 60s, just as there are now. Plenty of sadistic teachers too. Go read what Roald Dahl, for instance, thought about the use of corporal punishment at his school.

If a parent can only control their child with violence then they are a bad parent. If a teacher can only control a class with violence than they are a bad teacher. It really is that simple.

No it isn't that simple at all. You're a teacher and little Johnny is messing about with his phone in class, you tell him to stop doing so and he tells you to "f*** off", and yes that's how some kids talk to teachers nowadays. What would you do next?
 

theboywho

Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
64
Location
Newcastle-upon-Tyne
Poor parenting accounts for some bad behaviour. Agreed nobody writes the book and most have rarely enjoyed perfect parenting but it has to be said that lack of authority, love and safety account for poor behaviour.

This generation seems to ignore the fact that it has liberalised education and the family unit to its peril.
 

Jordeh

Member
Joined
18 Aug 2010
Messages
372
Location
London
Wouldn't you have to make physical contact to confiscate his phone thereby putting yourself at risk of being arrested for assault ?
"Give me your phone or you'll be suspended" worked pretty well when I was at school (not very long ago).
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
Poor parenting accounts for some bad behaviour. Agreed nobody writes the book and most have rarely enjoyed perfect parenting but it has to be said that lack of authority, love and safety account for poor behaviour.

This generation seems to ignore the fact that it has liberalised education and the family unit to its peril.

I agree but there have always been bad parents. However their kids got the discipline that was lacking in their home life at school.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
"Give me your phone or you'll be suspended" worked pretty well when I was at school (not very long ago).

Suspended? In other words given an extra holiday
 

muz379

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2014
Messages
2,500
"Give me your phone or you'll be suspended" worked pretty well when I was at school (not very long ago).

When I was at school (again not very long ago ) the kids that would have been caught playing with their phones and then refused to give the phone to a teacher so it could be confiscated are the ones that wouldn't have minded getting suspended .Their parents also wouldn't have done anything had they been suspended .

Which is all good and well for the rest of the kids in that class/school who want to learn . But then when that kid turns 16 and has no skills or qualifications and is thrown out into the real world it starts to turn nasty .
 

STEVIEBOY1

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2010
Messages
4,001
This is always going to be a controversial subject.

When I was at school in the 1960s and 1970s we were still punished, by having to write out large quantities of lines, which I hated, they were very tedious, or do detentions, or perhaps get the slipper or cane.

I heard of someone recently complaining that he had been given detention, but it was just for 10 minutes, for more serious matters they have to stay back for 20 minutes.

Neither of those to me seem very long. The minimum length of detention in our school was 30 minutes, but more usual was one or two hours, even longer sometimes, or worse still was a Saturday morning detention. We had to either write lines, do hard maths, (without calculators), or do a very long essay about why we were in detention. Sometimes too we had to run around our very large playing fields several times.

Just knowing these methods were available usually acted as a deterrent.
 

ExRes

Established Member
Joined
16 Dec 2012
Messages
8,289
Location
Back in Sussex
"Give me your phone or you'll be suspended" worked pretty well when I was at school (not very long ago).

From what I read of the teacher/student relationship nowdays I can just guess the reply to "Give me your phone or you'll be suspended"
 

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,380
Location
Liverpool
Personally I don't think the youth of today are any worse behaved than my generation or those that came before. When things do go wrong you just hear about it more thanks to 24 hour rolling tv news coverage, the internet and sensationalism.

For anyone who thinks things are much worse now check out the old TV play from the 70's "Our Day Out". It is based on things Willy Russell saw in his time teaching at a school in a not great area of Liverpool. Keep in mind that this will have been very much sanitised so it could be shown on the BBC.
 
Last edited:

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
Tony Mac gave a good explanation as to why quoting stats is pointless

Stats are useful except when they prove what you want them to prove, apparently.

You can abuse them, but there are well known methods for stopping people doing exactly that. Anyone who turns around and dismisses all statistics because of what you've said almost certainly just doesn't like the fact that real-world evidence is against them.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Fear of punishment is how life works, most adults don't break the law for fear of arrest prosecution and maybe imprisonment.

Engaging with kids is fine up to point.

Your final sentence is just ridiculous!

Or maybe you just can't accept that your way of dealing with things is simplistic, rubbish and just doesn't work in the long term. Violence breeds violence, and not all of us want to live in the stone age thank you very much.

I do what works, not what my base impulse tells me to do.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Confiscate his phone?

This. I taught in China where corporal punishment was (and is) used quite a lot. Taking their phones off them was by far the easiest solution. They might have hated you for it, but frankly the solution was to engage them with more interesting activity. Chinese kids are even more prone to spend their whole time on their phones, so this was a major issue.

If they told me to "**** off" I'd just give them more work. If they didn't do that, I'd just repeatedly embarrass them in front of the class and keep doing it. The easiest way to engage with a kid is on their level, and once you do that you actually have a lot more power over them as they realise that they don't have anything on you that they can do better than you. If I'd hit them it wouldn't have changed a thing, as I saw with some other teachers.


And if you're going to say that "Chinese kids are obviously all better behaved", then I'll have you know that a) some brought alcohol to school as though it was normal, b) did fight, c) did answer back etc. They were exactly the same once they'd got over the fact you were a weird foreigner, and this was supposedly an extremely good school.

So you'll excuse me if I think my personal experience trumps yours, Antman. The statistics and experience as a teacher are both on my side here.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top