Maybe Gibraltar can negotiate to stay in the EU even if the UK leaves.

Maybe if the UK leaves, and Scotland goes independent so that Scotland can remain in the EU, Gibraltar could claim to be a part of Scotland, not a part of England![]()
Maybe if the UK leaves, and Scotland goes independent so that Scotland can remain in the EU, Gibraltar could claim to be a part of Scotland, not a part of England![]()
This is from the Times website (the rest is behind a paywall).Did I hear correctly this morning that "fears" of a Brexit success has affected the value of Sterling in a detrimental manner?
A lead for the Leave campaign in European referendum polling over the weekend led sterling to fall in Asia overnight.
The pound dropped by as much as 0.7 per cent against the euro and 1.1 per cent against the dollar. A YouGov poll for ITVs Good Morning Britain put the Brexit campaign ahead by four points, on 45 per cent.
With less than three weeks to go before polling day in the UK, Asian markets also faced a tough start to the week following disappointing US employment figures on Friday.
Never been more serious.
They're closing the border, that's a given, the minute we have officially left and aren't under EU rules; and I don't put shipping blockades past them.
They are doing their upmost now by extending border checks to as long as they can get away with, and are itching to shut the thing completely.
With one caveat, they hand back the wee bit they have on the other side of the water.
Strictly speaking it's two wee bits.
Maybe Gibraltar can negotiate to stay in the EU even if the UK leaves.
Complete this well known saying:-
Gibraltar is to Scotland as The Isle of Man is to........"
I'm seeking information. Am I right in thinking that technically the referendum is advisory on the government and not binding? And that if Brexit wins, all that happens straight away is that a process of negotiation to work out the terms of leaving begins, following the course set down in EU rules?
I'm seeking information. Am I right in thinking that technically the referendum is advisory on the government and not binding? And that if Brexit wins, all that happens straight away is that a process of negotiation to work out the terms of leaving begins, following the course set down in EU rules? What then happens if at the end of that process of negotiation the Westminster government decides that the terms on offer simply are not good enough to be acceptable? Do we have another referendum at that stage, or do we still leave regardless of the fact that the terms of leaving might be massively disadvantageous?
Or to put it another way, there's not a cat in hells chance of us being allowed to leave. The EU won't drop down to just 2 net funders, and our MPs will not allow their back up gravy train to leave without them.
So vote leave, get the sweetener, and just be a little bit better off whilst having the same circumstances.
Or to put it another way, there's not a cat in hells chance of us being allowed to leave. The EU won't drop down to just 2 net funders, and our MPs will not allow their back up gravy train to leave without them.
So vote leave, get the sweetener, and just be a little bit better off whilst having the same circumstances.
Although I want out I think a lot of the undecideds will in the end opt for the status quo and we'll stay in.
Tory mp Mark Garnier was on LBC yesterday and he was quite adamant that if a Leave vote was the result hundreds of mp's would simply ignore the will of the people and refuse to pass the required parliamentary bill.
The other strong possibility is of course a second referendum which is how the EU works when it can't get it's own way.
Well it's certainly possible the highly democratic house of lords could delay it, but the party whips in the tory party will obey Boris, and I suspect that many in the labour party will back it in any case.
My hope in the case of a brexit vote would be a vote of no confidence in the government, another election, a fracturing of the tory party into two parties, a collapse of the FPTP system, the sensible tory party campaigning with a promise to stay in the EU, labour the same (minus the nutters), and a sensible-labour/sensible-tory coalition government with a combined vote of at least 50% of the voters getting in and bringing some much needed reform to a system that has seen the tories being unsuitable for government since Thatcher resigned because of the eu issue.
So if there was a Stay vote you would also be happy if we then had a new Govt. by whatever means and they decided to leave without a new referendum.
If there was a stay vote, then a vote of no confidence in the government, then if UKIP and the tory-skeptics managed to get 50% of the vote with a manifesto commitment to leave the EU, and then we left, I'd be fine with that.
when was the last time we had a govt. With 50% of the vote ?
2010-2015, 54.4% of the vote.
But your question just shows how undemocratic the UK is, and why any arguments about EU democracy are doomed to fail.
Net funders are Germany, France, UK, Netherlands, Italy, Sweden, Belgium, Austria, Denmark, and Finland, so UK leaving would drop to 9 net funders.
Or is this brexit maths?
The European Commission estimates that there are more than 30 ways to calculate net figures for budget contributions.
It will be WWIII, If we stay in and Turkey join the EU.From the EU....
...so it looks like the old lies, damned lies, and statistics, maths to me.
WWIII, if we leave, anyone ?
Just so I understand you...
A legislature elected by a majority of the electorate, like we had in 2010-2015, is undemocratic.
A legislature elected by 0% of the electorate, which is what we have in the EU, is democratic.
That's what you're saying, right?
Ten more eastern European countries from the western Balkans and ex-Soviet countries are set to join, then there's Turkey too. There are already four million eastern Europeans here, and many unchecked ones with dire criminal records in their home countries.
An example of the mass eastern European influx is that my local public library has signs in Polish, Bulgarian, and Romanian asking library users not cause trouble.
If these unwanted migrants can't be bothered to learn English, then deport them.
It will be WWIII, If we stay in and Turkey join the EU.
Going by your figures 987 Poles+690 Romanians+650 Lithuanians (at a rough guess)+600 Bulgarians (at a rough guess) = 2927 out of a population of 4 million. Or to put it another way, 0.07% of the Eastern European population of the UK.There are currently 987 Polish rapists and murderers in British jails as well as 690 Romanian murderers and rapists. Lithuanians make up the third biggest foreign population in British jails after the Poles and Romanians. Bulgarians are not too far behind.