Should overcrowding be the norm? NO!!!

[Deerfold]

Curses. Hoisted upon my autocorrected petard.

At least it didn't correct to you're.

The point still stands - the sentence makes no sense with you instead of your, however the previous example was valid with do instead of did.

It wasn't hard tell that they were interested in your related experiences though, was it?

Which you've chosen not to answer.

 

[Tibbs]

It wasn't hard tell that they were interested in your related experiences though, was it?

Which you've chosen not to answer.

The LM experience was also related, given that I stated that it was better than my SWT experiences.

I answered the question put in front of me. Given that this forum is about as detail oriented and accuracy focused as it gets, it was hardly an unreasonable position to take the question posed at face value.

 

[Deerfold]

The LM experience was also related, given that I stated that it was better than my SWT experiences.

I answered the question put in front of me. Given that this forum is about as detail oriented and accuracy focused as it gets, it was hardly an unreasonable position to take the question posed at face value.

And they clarified what they meant at 1721 yesterday. It's very easy to make an occasional mistake, though obviously we should try our best not to.

Is there a reason for not answering the modified question? It seems to be quite a simple one.

 

[RichmondCommu]

Richmond to Waterloo is twenty-two minutes at best, and a fifteen-minute walk to Bankside (from www.walkit.org).
Richmond to Blackfriars is forty-two minutes, and a twelve-minute walk.
So that's thirty-seven mins v. fifty-four mins, but with the advantage that you get on the Tube at the terminus so will almost certainly get a seat.

I have considered taking the Tube from Richmond but I'd rather have the extra time in bed. In terms of Richmond to Waterloo I always aim to catch the quicker train but this has no bearing on the loading. I'm 47 and have accepted that things will never change

 

[Deerfold]

The LM experience was also related, given that I stated that it was better than my SWT experiences.

I answered the question put in front of me. Given that this forum is about as detail oriented and accuracy focused as it gets, it was hardly an unreasonable position to take the question posed at face value.

Do we take it you've taken umbrage at a minor mistake in a post or is there some other reason you don't wish to let us know the answer to the question, as revised / clarified?