Highlandspring
Established Member
- Joined
- 14 Oct 2017
- Messages
- 2,777
Photo was taken on Friday.Do we know when this picture was taken?
Photo was taken on Friday.Do we know when this picture was taken?
Agreed. On the 170 back north yesterday, it was packed (1209 from Queen Street) with tourists from all over the world plus about half from Scotland. I was next to a German lady who was shocked to see only three carriages, a dirty train, old seats and how small the train was overall. Very little can be done about the latter but the 50-6-mph crawl up Drumochter will be much better with the HSTs I hope.
Can they go much faster though for the 10 miles north of Blair Atholl?
Photo was taken on Friday.
Out the tunnel at 55 compared to 35-40 for a DMU.how do they cope with Queen street tunnel?
just like an EMU thenOut the tunnel at 55 compared to 35-40 for a DMU.
This is a good point. Linespeed on the double section between Blair Atholl and Dalwhinnie isn't ever great, whether you're going up or down. It's really quite winding by comparison with other sections of the route but I think this generally gets overlooked because everyone's relieved that it isn't single.Unfortunately, the HST is limited to 60mph from Struan to Dalnaspidal ('SP' differential speeds - an 'SP' sprinter train can do 70mph - which it can't physically do anyway!) - I'd like to think this would be looked at, as the HST could easily go faster. There re a number of these 'SP' differential speed boards on the HML, but that is the one that is the most glaring, in terms of performance & timings.
This is a good point. Linespeed on the double section between Blair Atholl and Dalwhinnie isn't ever great, whether you're going up or down. It's really quite winding by comparison with other sections of the route but I think this generally gets overlooked because everyone's relieved that it isn't single.
Obviously I'm not suggesting that anything tries to go down Drumochter any faster than at the moment, that freight tried it on Slochd a few years ago, but if they can do anything to speed us up northbound then it would be a useful extra win for the HSTs.
In the case of Trident, it should be.It is not a zero-sum game.

Would be kind of difficult, as steam officially disappeared from the mainline in 1968....also, A4 steam locos weren't running in 1978.....!I wonder what the reaction would have been in 1978 if British rail had said the future for Scottish Intercity services was refurbished LNER articulated stock hauled by reboilered A4 pacifics - the same age then (if they'd been around) as the HSTs are today!![]()
So am I, would like to actually see them in service, but all carping aside a big improvement on what we have. The time for arguing over the 40 year old cast off stuff is past. Roll on getting them in service, hopefully at least one or two this year.Would be kind of difficult, as steam officially disappeared from the mainline in 1968....also, A4 steam locos weren't running in 1978.....!
The HSTs are here - I for one am glad that they are!
success will be measured in time-honoured financial terms- bums on seats.how will the success/failure of the HST introduction be objectively measured? Passenger surveys? General public-domain "noise"?
The nearer equivalent would be to ask what the reaction would have been if British Rail had said that the future for Scottish internal expresses was refurbished Type 4 diesels released by the introduction of HSTs on the Great Western Main Line. Which is more or less what actually happened.I wonder what the reaction would have been in 1978 if British rail had said the future for Scottish Intercity services was refurbished LNER articulated stock hauled by reboilered A4 pacifics - the same age then (if they'd been around) as the HSTs are today!![]()
So am I, would like to actually see them in service, but all carping aside a big improvement on what we have. The time for arguing over the 40 year old cast off stuff is past. Roll on getting them in service, hopefully at least one or two this year.
I stand to be corrected, but this must be very unusual, or perhaps unprecedented, as a project where such a large number of trains of this age are refurbished and redeployed in the way that is happening here?
So, surely, it's important to keep an open mind until or unless there is evidence either way? Full disclosure - I think HST will be a huge success, but if it isn't I will be willing to accept so.
However, how will the success/failure of the HST introduction be objectively measured? Passenger surveys? General public-domain "noise"?
Does a large part of training involve the DI slapping your hand so you don't take power where you're used to?as I've said previously, having driven the 2+4 training train, I can vouch for the performance upgrade
Does a large part of training involve the DI slapping your hand so you don't take power where you're used to?![]()
100% agree....the Mk3 is a very pleasant way to travel &, as I've said previously, having driven the 2+4 training train, I can vouch for the performance upgrade!
Scotrail just need to keep on top of the maintenance requirements - that's what the training train is useful for, it's not just train crews who are learning just now....
I'm confident Haymarket will rise to the occasion. There is anecdotal evidence of some Craigentinny staff being poached already.I think you make the most important point. the reliability of the trains could be the chillies heel here, the maintenance crews in Liara were well used to the intricacies of the power cars, we need to make sure the Scotrail teams learn quickly and are on top of the issues. Poor reliability would be a disaster in the public eye.
Am sure you are right. Reliability never been an issue for 170’s. Keep up the good work.I'm confident Haymarket will rise to the occasion. There is anecdotal evidence of some Craigentinny staff being poached already.
ScotRail need to be setting their sights rather higher than the reliability of the GWR HST fleet - GWR have the worst reliability of any HST fleet, and by quite a considerable margin. Looking at what Craigentinny do with the East Coast fleet would be a much better starting point.I think you make the most important point. the reliability of the trains could be the chillies heel here, the maintenance crews in Liara were well used to the intricacies of the power cars, we need to make sure the Scotrail teams learn quickly and are on top of the issues. Poor reliability would be a disaster in the public eye.
It's certainly different to driving a Class 170/158, that's for sure!!
I think you make the most important point. the reliability of the trains could be the chillies heel here, the maintenance crews in Liara were well used to the intricacies of the power cars, we need to make sure the Scotrail teams learn quickly and are on top of the issues. Poor reliability would be a disaster in the public eye.
I'm guessing that you won't know, but surely the answer to that would be either (a) re-install the switch; or (b) re-label it with a very prominent label.Like the lock on the high tension cupboard of 43021 is fitted the wrong way round. Needs to be at "open" for the engine to run. Caught a few folk out already.
Yes it will get fixed but it's just an "intricacy " that people are finding.I'm guessing that you won't know, but surely the answer to that would be either (a) re-install the switch; or (b) re-label it with a very prominent label.
Like the lock on the high tension cupboard of 43021 is fitted the wrong way round. Needs to be at "open" for the engine to run. Caught a few folk out already.